|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jun 15, 2021 9:24:18 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jun 15, 2021 9:45:08 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by believeinthebeavs on Jun 15, 2021 9:46:53 GMT -8
Actually it was pork. What a shame. If what she said about no build up in her system is true it casts enough doubt that a 4 year suspension seems a bit much. |
|
|
|
Post by larbeav on Jun 15, 2021 9:57:20 GMT -8
OSU should change shoe companies when the Nike contract is over. It would be interesting who & how much the amount of money would be the bid for Beaver sports in the next contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Jun 15, 2021 11:24:28 GMT -8
Maybe she's telling the truth. The problem is so many others in her sport were doping and denying it makes it that much harder to believe her.
Must have been a heck of a lot of pork in that burrito.
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jun 15, 2021 11:29:58 GMT -8
Maybe she's telling the truth. The problem is so many others in her sport were doping and denying it makes it that much harder to believe her. Must have been a heck of a lot of pork in that burrito. Especially after Alberto Salazar, anything Nike-sponsored in competitive Track and Field is tainted for some time to come. I think the “PIB” (Performance Enhancing Burrito) alibi is weak. www.google.com/amp/s/www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sports/nike-coach-alberto-salazar-appeal/amp |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jun 15, 2021 11:51:50 GMT -8
Actually it was pork. What a shame. If what she said about no build up in her system is true it casts enough doubt that a 4 year suspension seems a bit much. Or the newest high tech form of the drug doesn’t build up in the system. Nothing but the best you know. |
|
|
|
Post by beaver94 on Jun 15, 2021 14:54:45 GMT -8
Actually it was pork. What a shame. If what she said about no build up in her system is true it casts enough doubt that a 4 year suspension seems a bit much. Or the newest high tech form of the drug doesn’t build up in the system. Nothing but the best you know. This or some type of cycle that would help avoid build up were my first thoughts. Maybe she's telling the truth too though. Probably only a couple people know for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jun 15, 2021 16:04:38 GMT -8
This is stupid. As I understand it, nandrolone is what baseball players and weightlifters use to build muscle. This is Roger Clemens used nandrolone. If you were actually doping to run a distance race, you would use something else. So, Shelby Houlihan is being punished for taking performance-enhancing drugs that do not actually enhance her performance.
This should get overturned and quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jun 15, 2021 17:07:26 GMT -8
This is stupid. As I understand it, nandrolone is what baseball players and weightlifters use to build muscle. This is Roger Clemens used nandrolone. If you were actually doping to run a distance race, you would use something else. So, Shelby Houlihan is being punished for taking performance-enhancing drugs that do not actually enhance her performance. This should get overturned and quickly. Dont count on it. |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jun 15, 2021 17:35:49 GMT -8
This is stupid. As I understand it, nandrolone is what baseball players and weightlifters use to build muscle. This is Roger Clemens used nandrolone. If you were actually doping to run a distance race, you would use something else. So, Shelby Houlihan is being punished for taking performance-enhancing drugs that do not actually enhance her performance. This should get overturned and quickly. Pretty big leap there. It is an anabolic steroid after all. Regarding track uses, Linford Christie, a British sprinter and 1992 Olympic gold medalist, tested positive for nandrolone in 1999. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jun 15, 2021 21:19:02 GMT -8
This is stupid. As I understand it, nandrolone is what baseball players and weightlifters use to build muscle. This is Roger Clemens used nandrolone. If you were actually doping to run a distance race, you would use something else. So, Shelby Houlihan is being punished for taking performance-enhancing drugs that do not actually enhance her performance. This should get overturned and quickly. Pretty big leap there. It is an anabolic steroid after all. Regarding track uses, Linford Christie, a British sprinter and 1992 Olympic gold medalist, tested positive for nandrolone in 1999. The British Athletic Foundation found Linford Christie not guilty. The IAAF overruled the British Athletic Foundation and banned him for two years. The British Athletic Foundation found it unlikely that Linford Christie would intentionally use nandrolone, because it is primarily used to build muscle and would be generally counter-productive to a sprinter. Nandrolone is naturally-occurring in the human body. 19-norandrostenedione is a nandrolone precursor and can produce positive tests for nandrolone without using nandrolone. At the time, 19-norandrostenedione was sold over-the-counter in the United States of America. It is possible that Christie was using 19-norandrostenedione as a supplement without knowing that it could cause a positive nandrolone test. |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Jun 16, 2021 7:24:40 GMT -8
Maybe she's telling the truth. The problem is so many others in her sport were doping and denying it makes it that much harder to believe her. Must have been a heck of a lot of pork in that burrito. Especially after Alberto Salazar, anything Nike-sponsored in competitive Track and Field is tainted for some time to come. I think the “PIB” (Performance Enhancing Burrito) alibi is weak. www.google.com/amp/s/www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sports/nike-coach-alberto-salazar-appeal/ampThese days, you just have to say Nike athlete and you know that the rest of the headline is doping related. On a side note, I guess I’ll be eating more pork burritos. |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Jun 16, 2021 7:31:38 GMT -8
OSU should change shoe companies when the Nike contract is over. It would be interesting who & how much the amount of money would be the bid for Beaver sports in the next contract. Why? I mean other than there are better shoe companies out there. A year or two ago, this was debated on the boards and someone posted what we get from our deal with Nike. It’s very good. Plus, Nike employs a lot of Oregonians, so it’s good for our state. Do we hate the Nike—UofO connection? Of course. |
|
|
|
Post by ag87 on Jun 16, 2021 7:35:34 GMT -8
|
|
