|
Post by korculabeav on Sept 7, 2019 23:43:53 GMT -8
....been a win! That was a season defining loss that will likely demoralize this team to potential winlessness!
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Sept 7, 2019 23:49:06 GMT -8
....been a win! That was a season defining loss that will likely demoralize this team to potential winlessness! BEAVERS HOLD HAWAII TO 14 POINTS BELOW THEIR SEASON AVERAGE!
|
|
|
Post by korculabeav on Sept 7, 2019 23:51:41 GMT -8
....been a win! That was a season defining loss that will likely demoralize this team to potential winlessness! BEAVERS HOLD HAWAII TO 14 POINTS BELOW THEIR SEASON AVERAGE! moral victory Pettibone style
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Sept 8, 2019 0:09:31 GMT -8
So when Hawaii plays on a late December/January Bowl game will you still be saying this game should have been an immediate win?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2019 0:15:16 GMT -8
So when Hawaii plays on a late December/January Bowl game will you still be saying this game should have been an immediate win? I like how they are putting beating us and UA on some sort of pedestal. They will get burned again if they get selected for some bowl game.
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Sept 8, 2019 0:16:47 GMT -8
OSU is winning at least 2 Pac 12 games. There I said it.
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever on Sept 8, 2019 0:27:38 GMT -8
They were favored by 7....but damn, we should've won that game. If you'd told me Hawaii would only get 31 and we were +2 in turnovers, I'd have taken that before kickoff for sure.
|
|
|
Post by bucktoothvarmit on Sept 8, 2019 5:18:09 GMT -8
....been a win! That was a season defining loss that will likely demoralize this team to potential winlessness! better go follow your hero at Utah St. then korculabeav
|
|
billsaab
Freshman
Retired. Live in SW Washington on 73/4 Acres.
Posts: 589
|
Post by billsaab on Sept 8, 2019 5:37:28 GMT -8
Not impressed with 2 no half offense. We are bad. Not hardly worth watching . I have tickets,but they do not excite Me anymore. Our QB needs to be replaced. How can we have 45 Yards passing in a half. Sad.
|
|
|
Post by beavers84 on Sept 8, 2019 8:51:21 GMT -8
The problem with this program is not the coaches or players it's the lack of investment by the university and fan base. It's the same old story with a few positive hiccups over the last half century. There's no excuse for not being able to do what's done in Pullman
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 8, 2019 8:58:13 GMT -8
Kind of glad I didn’t have to watch that game. Listening to it on the radio was painful enough. I’m no masochist.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Sept 8, 2019 9:08:16 GMT -8
The problem with this program is not the coaches or players it's the lack of investment by the university and fan base. It's the same old story with a few positive hiccups over the last half century. There's no excuse for not being able to do what's done in Pullman Since you have 84 in your title, I maybe wrongly assumed you were old enough to remember more than current history, both at OSU and WSU. Doba and Wulff took a good solid program to the bottom. The Cougs gambled on a good but controversial coach, the timing was right, and the gamble paid off so far. Is Smith our Leach? No one knows. The Cougs are very good now, but I’m sure someone here will post about their massive athletic dept debt. Good Things don’t happen overnight, especially when trying to do it with financial responsibility. *Edit: But bad things do! Check out what happened to a very good basketball program post Bennett’s. Now they’re bad to the Bone. It happens.
|
|
|
Post by beavers84 on Sept 8, 2019 10:04:13 GMT -8
The problem with this program is not the coaches or players it's the lack of investment by the university and fan base. It's the same old story with a few positive hiccups over the last half century. There's no excuse for not being able to do what's done in Pullman Since you have 84 in your title, I maybe wrongly assumed you were old enough to remember more than current history, both at OSU and WSU. Doba and Wulff took a good solid program to the bottom. The Cougs gambled on a good but controversial coach, the timing was right, and the gamble paid off so far. Is Smith our Leach? No one knows. The Cougs are very good now, but I’m sure someone here will post about their massive athletic dept debt. Good Things don’t happen overnight, especially when trying to do it with financial responsibility. *Edit: But bad things do! Check out what happened to a very good basketball program post Bennett’s. Now they’re bad to the Bone. It happens. Well I’ve been attending since 78 and WSU has won 50 plus more games than we have over that period. Football success is the absolute key to financial success in any athletic department. If you don’t invest in it you will fail consistently with an occasional decent run/year. You win, let me rephrase are “competitive “ and get 10000 more paying fans maybe 5 million plus a year in revenue not counting more donations you can afford to pay a decent staff and improve facilities over time. If not, live with the consistent failure , make the best of it but give it a rest on the coaches and players.
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Sept 8, 2019 10:07:43 GMT -8
The problem with this program is not the coaches or players it's the lack of investment by the university and fan base. It's the same old story with a few positive hiccups over the last half century. There's no excuse for not being able to do what's done in Pullman Mike Leach was 3-9, 6-7 and 3-9 his first three years at WSU. And he had veteran QBs Tuel and Halliday to work with. Wulf actually had WSU trending up when he was fired, unlike Anderpants. What's WSU's record compared to ours in "modern" time, like the last 20 years? PS: 50 more wins over a 42-year period (since 1978) averages out to about 1.2 per year. Not much of a difference, for all their supposed excellence.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Sept 8, 2019 10:09:04 GMT -8
Since you have 84 in your title, I maybe wrongly assumed you were old enough to remember more than current history, both at OSU and WSU. Doba and Wulff took a good solid program to the bottom. The Cougs gambled on a good but controversial coach, the timing was right, and the gamble paid off so far. Is Smith our Leach? No one knows. The Cougs are very good now, but I’m sure someone here will post about their massive athletic dept debt. Good Things don’t happen overnight, especially when trying to do it with financial responsibility. *Edit: But bad things do! Check out what happened to a very good basketball program post Bennett’s. Now they’re bad to the Bone. It happens. Well I’ve been attending since 78 and WSU has won 50 plus more games than we have over that period. Football success is the absolute key to financial success in any athletic department. If you don’t invest in it you will fail consistently with an occasional decent run/year. You win, let me rephrase are “competitive “ and get 10000 more paying fans maybe 5 million plus a year in revenue not counting more donations you can afford to pay a decent staff and improve facilities over time. If not, live with the consistent failure , make the best of it but give it a rest on the coaches and players. So since your focus is financial investment, are you saying Oregon St should follow WSU’s model? It appears so.
|
|