|
Post by speakthetruth on Oct 14, 2024 20:35:15 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting.
|
|
|
Post by speakthetruth on Oct 14, 2024 21:09:33 GMT -8
Really should have been a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty. Then he could apologize and face suspension like his despicable wide receiver.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 14, 2024 21:13:21 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Smart move. They need to fix that in the offseason.
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Oct 15, 2024 4:50:15 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Where did you read this?
|
|
|
Post by atownbeaver on Oct 15, 2024 10:06:50 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Why? if Bray did that, what would you say? Smart? Savvy? knowing the rules? Belichick did the same type of thing in the NFL with delay of games on punts and the NFL made a rule. When you find a loophole in the rules to use as an advantage to win, is it disgusting or is it smart? When teams take intentional delays of games to move back 5 yards for more room to punt or a better angle on a field goal, is that disgusting? Lanning used the rules to run out the clock. Nothing he did erased the fact that a veteran Ohio State QB wasn't aware enough of the game situation to not run up the middle and slide when he had a time out when they were already in makeable FG range.
|
|
|
Post by beaver55to7 on Oct 15, 2024 14:14:23 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Thank goodness our defensive backs coaches have never instructed a corner to grab a receiver when they get beat deep! or intentionally take a safety at the end of a game with our backs against the goal line, or carry a receiver out of bounds before he can get his feet down, or do anything else that an announcer might call a 'savvy veteran play'. If you ain't cheating you ain't trying is not the same as making sure your team has every advantage within the rules.
|
|
|
Post by jefframp on Oct 15, 2024 14:48:08 GMT -8
The most important question I have is whether or not Ryan Day slammed his clipboard into the ground. Or do they even use clipboards any more? Microsoft Surface Pro perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Oct 15, 2024 15:02:24 GMT -8
The most important question I have is whether or not Ryan Day slammed his clipboard into the ground. Or do they even use clipboards any more? Microsoft Surface Pro perhaps? tOSU stopped letting Day carry any type of pad or high tech gear vs Top 5 teams. At 2-6 (? saw 1-7 also?), 0 fer his last 4, he keeps breaking sh&t*. 😆 *Including the hearts of arrogant Buckeye fans🤣
|
|
|
Post by bigorangebeaver on Oct 15, 2024 15:26:08 GMT -8
The most important question I have is whether or not Ryan Day slammed his clipboard into the ground. Or do they even use clipboards any more? Microsoft Surface Pro perhaps? If he were truly an old school Ohio Stare football coach, slamming down his clipboard should have kicked up a cloud of dust.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Oct 15, 2024 15:54:32 GMT -8
The most important question I have is whether or not Ryan Day slammed his clipboard into the ground. Or do they even use clipboards any more? Microsoft Surface Pro perhaps? If he were truly an old school Ohio Stare football coach, slamming down his clipboard should have kicked up a cloud of dust. Plus he would have punched his Qb!
|
|
|
Post by beaverchew on Oct 15, 2024 16:50:26 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Why? if Bray did that, what would you say? Smart? Savvy? knowing the rules? Belichick did the same type of thing in the NFL with delay of games on punts and the NFL made a rule. When you find a loophole in the rules to use as an advantage to win, is it disgusting or is it smart? When teams take intentional delays of games to move back 5 yards for more room to punt or a better angle on a field goal, is that disgusting? Lanning used the rules to run out the clock. Nothing he did erased the fact that a veteran Ohio State QB wasn't aware enough of the game situation to not run up the middle and slide when he had a time out when they were already in makeable FG range. I haven't posted here in years but had to comment on this one. I didn't watch the game not a bit interested in the Ducks. Nothing spiteful I'm just not interested in Phil Knights little play thing. But the rule interpretation was interesting.
Can you quote the rule that was "used"?
I do go read the rules its pretty clear the officials blew this one. Not the first time something like this has happened at Autzen.
From the NCAA football rulebook. 12th Duck stepped on the field. About 6-7 seconds went by no other Duck stepped off the field. The play should have been blown dead at the snap of the ball.
More Than Eleven Players on the Field—ARTICLE 3
Approved Ruling 3-5-3
II. After the ball is made ready for play, substitute B12 enters the huddle or defensive formation and the departing player delays more than three seconds before leaving the huddle or formation and departing the field of play. RULING: Violation of the substitution rule. Dead- ball foul.
There is a whole section on unsportsmanlike conduct you can read which it probably was but much harder to determine that at the moment. This looked pretty clearcut to me and was just screwed up.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 15, 2024 17:10:06 GMT -8
Why? if Bray did that, what would you say? Smart? Savvy? knowing the rules? Belichick did the same type of thing in the NFL with delay of games on punts and the NFL made a rule. When you find a loophole in the rules to use as an advantage to win, is it disgusting or is it smart? When teams take intentional delays of games to move back 5 yards for more room to punt or a better angle on a field goal, is that disgusting? Lanning used the rules to run out the clock. Nothing he did erased the fact that a veteran Ohio State QB wasn't aware enough of the game situation to not run up the middle and slide when he had a time out when they were already in makeable FG range. I haven't posted here in years but had to comment on this one. I didn't watch the game not a bit interested in the Ducks. Nothing spiteful I'm just not interested in Phil Knights little play thing. But the rule interpretation was interesting.
Can you quote the rule that was "used"?
I do go read the rules its pretty clear the officials blew this one. Not the first time something like this has happened at Autzen.
From the NCAA football rulebook. 12th Duck stepped on the field. About 6-7 seconds went by no other Duck stepped off the field. The play should have been blown dead at the snap of the ball.
More Than Eleven Players on the Field—ARTICLE 3
Approved Ruling 3-5-3
II. After the ball is made ready for play, substitute B12 enters the huddle or defensive formation and the departing player delays more than three seconds before leaving the huddle or formation and departing the field of play. RULING: Violation of the substitution rule. Dead- ball foul.
There is a whole section on unsportsmanlike conduct you can read which it probably was but much harder to determine that at the moment. This looked pretty clearcut to me and was just screwed up.
You cite the offensive rules. For defensive teams, it is a live ball foul. They changed the rule to make it a live ball foul in 2020, because of the rule that allows defenses to respond to an offense's substitution. They said that it was impossible to police the illegal substitution rule for most of the game, because of the interplay between the rules and the 40-second play clock.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 15, 2024 17:11:01 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Lanning did not admit anything. Everyone is taking what Lanning said as an admission, however. And Lanning has not bothered to deny.
|
|
|
Post by beaverchew on Oct 15, 2024 17:39:40 GMT -8
I haven't posted here in years but had to comment on this one. I didn't watch the game not a bit interested in the Ducks. Nothing spiteful I'm just not interested in Phil Knights little play thing. But the rule interpretation was interesting.
Can you quote the rule that was "used"?
I do go read the rules its pretty clear the officials blew this one. Not the first time something like this has happened at Autzen.
From the NCAA football rulebook. 12th Duck stepped on the field. About 6-7 seconds went by no other Duck stepped off the field. The play should have been blown dead at the snap of the ball.
More Than Eleven Players on the Field—ARTICLE 3
Approved Ruling 3-5-3
II. After the ball is made ready for play, substitute B12 enters the huddle or defensive formation and the departing player delays more than three seconds before leaving the huddle or formation and departing the field of play. RULING: Violation of the substitution rule. Dead- ball foul.
There is a whole section on unsportsmanlike conduct you can read which it probably was but much harder to determine that at the moment. This looked pretty clearcut to me and was just screwed up.
You cite the offensive rules. For defensive teams, it is a live ball foul. They changed the rule to make it a live ball foul in 2020, because of the rule that allows defenses to respond to an offense's substitution. They said that it was impossible to police the illegal substitution rule for most of the game, because of the interplay between the rules and the 40-second play clock.
Can you show me where it says "offensive"?
Go read the entire rule and situational examples. There are situations that change if its a live or dead ball. This was clearly a dead ball event its pretty straightforward.
|
|
|
Post by speakthetruth on Oct 15, 2024 19:16:48 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Lanning did not admit anything. Everyone is taking what Lanning said as an admission, however. And Lanning has not bothered to deny. Lanning said they go through all kinds of game scenarios. The 12 on the field was one of the scenarios. The ucks called a timeout right before the play. Must have just been a coincidence.
|
|