|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Oct 16, 2024 21:41:10 GMT -8
Pretty simple. If all 12 players are participating in the play, penalty and clock reset. If the 12th player is making a legit attempt to get off the field and is not participating in the play, penalty and no reset.
|
|
|
Post by beaverchew on Oct 17, 2024 8:43:52 GMT -8
Pretty simple. If all 12 players are participating in the play, penalty and clock reset. If the 12th player is making a legit attempt to get off the field and is not participating in the play, penalty and no reset. The rule already said that. The NCAA only added to the bucket of goo of situational interpretations that made this confusing to begin with. If you go look at the NFL rules, they have just clear rules not rules that are overruled by multiple situational interpretations. I swear the NCAA rules committee must be made up of lawyers not people with common sense. Read Section 5 rule on substitutions then go down to the situational interpretations and try to make any sense out of it. NCAA Rulebook
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Oct 18, 2024 10:00:11 GMT -8
Pretty simple. If all 12 players are participating in the play, penalty and clock reset. If the 12th player is making a legit attempt to get off the field and is not participating in the play, penalty and no reset. The rule already said that. The NCAA only added to the bucket of goo of situational interpretations that made this confusing to begin with. If you go look at the NFL rules, they have just clear rules not rules that are overruled by multiple situational interpretations. I swear the NCAA rules committee must be made up of lawyers not people with common sense. Read Section 5 rule on substitutions then go down to the situational interpretations and try to make any sense out of it. NCAA RulebookThe old rule did not say that. The clock wasn't reset to 10 seconds after UO was penalized. It remained at 6. This new rule changes how the rule is enforced.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Oct 18, 2024 10:42:32 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Lets be honest here. If OSU had won a game by taking a late penalty we’d all be calling it a genius move. I despise the *ucks as much as anyone but it’s a game and knowing the rules and using them to your advantage is just gamesmanship.
|
|
|
Post by hometownbeaver on Oct 20, 2024 7:56:11 GMT -8
Lanning admitted he committed a penalty to help the ucks win. Disgusting. Lets be honest here. If OSU had won a game by taking a late penalty we’d all be calling it a genius move. I despise the *ucks as much as anyone but it’s a game and knowing the rules and using them to your advantage is just gamesmanship. Without a doubt
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on Oct 21, 2024 6:05:35 GMT -8
This is silly. There was a “loophole,” Oregon found way to exploit it, loophole now closed. I’d expect nothing less from a coach/program and if you don’t think any other coach would do the same it is only because they weren’t smart enough to figure it out themselves. No different to me than a DB taking a PI or defensive holding penalty on a long pass play when he is obviously going to be beat for a TD.
|
|
|
Post by speakthetruth on Oct 21, 2024 8:34:02 GMT -8
I guess I must be a weird dude. While not illegal I just find it unethical to break a rule so you can succeed.
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on Oct 21, 2024 9:20:50 GMT -8
I guess I must be a weird dude. While not illegal I just find it unethical to break a rule so you can succeed. Did they break a rule? They just knew all the angles of the rule. As I pointed above, DBs “break a rule” often when grabbing a receiver when they know they’re beat to avoid a TD. You’d really have a problem if with a 1TD lead very late in a game a Beaver DB grabbed receiver to avoid the tying score to occur? Most on here would call it a smart play. How about an OLineman grabbing his opponent to stop him from having a direct shot at his QB? Reason is different (safety), but still knowingly breaking a rule.
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Oct 21, 2024 9:26:52 GMT -8
I guess I must be a weird dude. While not illegal I just find it unethical to break a rule so you can succeed. Did they break a rule? They just knew all the angles of the rule. As I pointed above, DBs “break a rule” often when grabbing a receiver when they know they’re beat to avoid a TD. You’d really have a problem if with a 1TD lead very late in a game a Beaver DB grabbed receiver to avoid the tying score to occur? Most on here would call it a smart play. How about an OLineman grabbing his opponent to stop him from having a direct shot at his QB? Reason is different (safety), but still knowingly breaking a rule. Hack-a-Shack, WR pick plays, kicking a ball OB to avoid recovery TD... on and on. I'd bet the NCAA adjusted as not many staffs, if any knew how to "use" said strategy. Let alone practiced it. Hence, it avoided it becoming a regular event.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Oct 21, 2024 11:33:42 GMT -8
I guess I must be a weird dude. While not illegal I just find it unethical to break a rule so you can succeed. Is this what they call “Virtue Signaling”?
|
|