|
Post by grayman on Jan 9, 2023 12:29:40 GMT -8
I used this term in a different thread, but I really believe Rueck hit the lottery with Beers. It's not just that she's so polished as a freshman and has been putting up double-doubles regularly, although that's obviously a big part of it. What really makes it so great for Rueck is that she fits into what he wants to do perfectly. Could she be the same impact player on teams that run other offenses? Sure. But unlike some recent posts who have left the program, the grass is just as green here (or greener) for Beers. She's a perfect piece to build around. It's up to Rueck to find a few more pieces (and the two incoming guards could be a great start). He seems determined to do so and add more team speed/quickness as well. My view of Rueck's philosophy changed significantly in the last few years. I do believe the college women's basketball landscape is much different than it was when Rueck had his highest level of success (yes, the change came quickly). And that his philosophy is no longer the best way to become elite and retain that level. Rueck went from knocking on the door of elite program status to falling completely out of contention. Last season I had all but given up on the program even getting back into the upper division of the Pac-12 on a regular basis, much less staying in competition for the conference title. Now, I think there's a chance that Rueck and the Beavers can at least be a factor in the Pac-12 race for the next several seasons and maybe even get into the NCAA Tournament a few times. And Beers is the biggest reason why. Once again, it's up to Rueck to make it happen.
|
|
|
Post by greybeav on Jan 11, 2023 23:54:07 GMT -8
Here's another, I forget she is a "bench player"
/photo/1
|
|
|
Post by rmancarl on Jan 12, 2023 13:13:08 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by jdogge on Jan 12, 2023 13:46:10 GMT -8
I used this term in a different thread, but I really believe Rueck hit the lottery with Beers. It's not just that she's so polished as a freshman and has been putting up double-doubles regularly, although that's obviously a big part of it. What really makes it so great for Rueck is that she fits into what he wants to do perfectly. Could she be the same impact player on teams that run other offenses? Sure. But unlike some recent posts who have left the program, the grass is just as green here (or greener) for Beers. She's a perfect piece to build around. It's up to Rueck to find a few more pieces (and the two incoming guards could be a great start). He seems determined to do so and add more team speed/quickness as well. My view of Rueck's philosophy changed significantly in the last few years. I do believe the college women's basketball landscape is much different than it was when Rueck had his highest level of success (yes, the change came quickly). And that his philosophy is no longer the best way to become elite and retain that level. Rueck went from knocking on the door of elite program status to falling completely out of contention. Last season I had all but given up on the program even getting back into the upper division of the Pac-12 on a regular basis, much less staying in competition for the conference title. Now, I think there's a chance that Rueck and the Beavers can at least be a factor in the Pac-12 race for the next several seasons and maybe even get into the NCAA Tournament a few times. And Beers is the biggest reason why. Once again, it's up to Rueck to make it happen. I think that change in philosophy should also include his reliance on the three-point shot. Our women are having issues with that. So, why not have them shoot closer to the basket? Three duces is better than three missed shots from beyond the arc. Then, once they gain their rhythm and confidence, bring the three back into the offense.
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jan 12, 2023 14:39:23 GMT -8
I used this term in a different thread, but I really believe Rueck hit the lottery with Beers. It's not just that she's so polished as a freshman and has been putting up double-doubles regularly, although that's obviously a big part of it. What really makes it so great for Rueck is that she fits into what he wants to do perfectly. Could she be the same impact player on teams that run other offenses? Sure. But unlike some recent posts who have left the program, the grass is just as green here (or greener) for Beers. She's a perfect piece to build around. It's up to Rueck to find a few more pieces (and the two incoming guards could be a great start). He seems determined to do so and add more team speed/quickness as well. My view of Rueck's philosophy changed significantly in the last few years. I do believe the college women's basketball landscape is much different than it was when Rueck had his highest level of success (yes, the change came quickly). And that his philosophy is no longer the best way to become elite and retain that level. Rueck went from knocking on the door of elite program status to falling completely out of contention. Last season I had all but given up on the program even getting back into the upper division of the Pac-12 on a regular basis, much less staying in competition for the conference title. Now, I think there's a chance that Rueck and the Beavers can at least be a factor in the Pac-12 race for the next several seasons and maybe even get into the NCAA Tournament a few times. And Beers is the biggest reason why. Once again, it's up to Rueck to make it happen. I think that change in philosophy should also include his reliance on the three-point shot. Our women are having issues with that. So, why not have them shoot closer to the basket? Three duces is better than three missed shots from beyond the arc. Then, once they gain their rhythm and confidence, bring the three back into the offense. I think I've now become more of a wait and see person on the 3-point shooting. OSU is struggling more than most teams (at least in the Pac-12) to get 3s to fall. I think TVO is just in somewhat of a slump but I expect her to work out of it at some point. But take a look at the rest of the team right now. Mit and Beers really don't take 3s. Nor should they, unless they have the ball right before the buzzer. Not either players' game. Aaron is doing just fine (15-46, .326). The freshmen actually are not too bad. Pietsch and Blacklock are both 9-27 (.333) and Hansford is 10-31 (.323) but those players don't get a lot of time comparatively. So it really comes down to Marotte (12-43, .279), Yeaney (3-18, .167 and not really a part of her game) and Mannen, who is 6-29, .207. TVO (28-88, .318) is not hitting 3s at quite the rate she has, but the stats aren't bad. So it really seems to be more a result of the roster's makeup and how much playing time Rueck thinks he can afford certain players. I also think that if they had a point guard that was really good at distributing the ball to open perimeter players, that would enhance the 3-point shooting as well. And as another poster pointed out regarding Gardiner, when she starts playing it will affect the playing time of some others, probably Mannen.
|
|
|
Post by bvrbooster on Jan 12, 2023 15:28:52 GMT -8
Someone who is more of an individual stats guy than I am could say whether the following is accurate. It has seemed to me that, in the last 2 games, AJ has attempted to shoot fewer 3's (where she has not excelled) and more of those 12 to 15 foot shots that are her bread and butter. I'm hoping that this is a deliberate strategy by the coaching staff which will bolster her confidence again, get her more minutes and more points.
For the 3 to be the dagger in the back type of weapon that it can be (and was for Arizona in the last few minutes of that game), you've got to have someone who can hit a high percentage of them - Like Kat, or Syd, or Aleah - and do so consistently. We just don't have that person right now, and AJ isn't ready to become one.
For what it's worth, here are our 3 point percentages (and a w or l) in the 5 conference games thus far:
25.9 (L) 15.4 (L) 45.5 (W) 18.8 (L) 41.2 (W)
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jan 12, 2023 15:42:13 GMT -8
Someone who is more of an individual stats guy than I am could say whether the following is accurate. It has seemed to me that, in the last 2 games, AJ has attempted to shoot fewer 3's (where she has not excelled) and more of those 12 to 15 foot shots that are her bread and butter. I'm hoping that this is a deliberate strategy by the coaching staff which will bolster her confidence again, get her more minutes and more points. For the 3 to be the dagger in the back type of weapon that it can be (and was for Arizona in the last few minutes of that game), you've got to have someone who can hit a high percentage of them - Like Kat, or Syd, or Aleah - and do so consistently. We just don't have that person right now, and AJ isn't ready to become one. For what it's worth, here are our 3 point percentages (and a w or l) in the 5 conference games thus far: 25.9 (L) 15.4 (L) 45.5 (W) 18.8 (L) 41.2 (W) I think you are right about AJ as far as the last two games. Looks like the level of defense the Beavers have faced from Oregon, Arizona and USC contributed highly to shutting down their 3-point shooting, yet another aspect to consider. It makes sense, but strong 3-point shooting teams find a way to get good looks. Again, it looks like Rueck has been giving more minutes to some lower-percentage 3-point shooters and a couple others just aren't hitting the shot as often.
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jan 12, 2023 16:08:40 GMT -8
Someone who is more of an individual stats guy than I am could say whether the following is accurate. It has seemed to me that, in the last 2 games, AJ has attempted to shoot fewer 3's (where she has not excelled) and more of those 12 to 15 foot shots that are her bread and butter. I'm hoping that this is a deliberate strategy by the coaching staff which will bolster her confidence again, get her more minutes and more points. For the 3 to be the dagger in the back type of weapon that it can be (and was for Arizona in the last few minutes of that game), you've got to have someone who can hit a high percentage of them - Like Kat, or Syd, or Aleah - and do so consistently. We just don't have that person right now, and AJ isn't ready to become one. For what it's worth, here are our 3 point percentages (and a w or l) in the 5 conference games thus far: 25.9 (L) 15.4 (L) 45.5 (W) 18.8 (L) 41.2 (W) I think you are right about AJ as far as the last two games. Looks like the level of defense the Beavers have faced from Oregon, Arizona and USC contributed highly to shutting down their 3-point shooting, yet another aspect to consider. It makes sense, but strong 3-point shooting teams find a way to get good looks. Again, it looks like Rueck has been giving more minutes to some lower-percentage 3-point shooters and a couple others just aren't hitting the shot as often. Well, I looked at the stats and it's not really true for AJ. I think she just shot the ball better from the field, particularly in the first half of the Arizona game. But working backwards, she was 1-2 vs ASU, 1-4 vs. UA, 0-0 for all shots against UCLA and USC, 1-5 vs. NC Central, 1-3 vs LSU, 1-2 vs Nevada, 1-3 vs Oregon, 0-3 vs Jackson State, 3-4 vs. Southern, 0-3 vs. Duke, 0-1 vs. Iowa, 2-6 vs. Prairie View, 0-2 vs. Eastern Washington, 0-1 vs. Seattle and 2-4 vs. Hawaii. So she really doesn't take more than a few 3s on average and hasn't been making them at a particularly good clip. Her .279 percentage has definitely been a result of her shooting spread over all games. She does not have an extremely bad or extremely good game or two to skew the stats. I will say that she has had several decent scoring games, so her mid-range game is definitely her strength.
|
|
|
Post by rmancarl on Jan 12, 2023 19:55:54 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by greybeav on Jan 12, 2023 19:58:18 GMT -8
I really like Michelle Smith's writing, haven't even read it yet but am confident I will, again, thanks for sharing c-man
|
|
|
Post by greybeav on Jan 20, 2023 0:14:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by believeinthebeavs on Jan 20, 2023 10:58:26 GMT -8
She is the epitome of OSU basketball, a terror on the court and oh so humble off. There is so much to like about her.
|
|
|
Post by skyrider on Jan 22, 2023 13:56:21 GMT -8
I believe that Raegan has the potential to be one of our all time greats. If she adds more skills to her already impressive resume the "sky is the limit" in the area of women's college basketball.
Can you imagine if she develops a 3 point shot how difficult it would be to guard her. Also additional post up moves and footwork.
Also, even more strength and jumping ability.
Probably is not tall enough for the WNBA but who knows with the proper determination and hours spent in the gym?
|
|
|
Post by newduke2 on Jan 22, 2023 17:32:03 GMT -8
I believe that Raegan has the potential to be one of our all time greats. If she adds more skills to her already impressive resume the "sky is the limit" in the area of women's college basketball. Can you imagine if she develops a 3 point shot how difficult it would be to guard her. Also additional post up moves and footwork. Also, even more strength and jumping ability. Probably is not tall enough for the WNBA but who knows with the proper determination and hours spent in the gym? Not tall enough for the WNBA? think "Round Mound of ReBounds"
|
|
|
Post by skyrider on Jan 22, 2023 17:50:07 GMT -8
newduke2
Excellent observation. There have been some truly outstanding rebounders in the NBA who were not great leapers but were great at positioning, timing and blocking out.
Go Beavs!
|
|