|
Post by spudbeaver on Oct 15, 2023 9:32:45 GMT -8
Pride cometh before the fall. Lanning was smelling himself and it cost him Goeth, actually. But yes, I get it.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Oct 15, 2023 15:26:56 GMT -8
Pride cometh before the fall. Lanning was smelling himself and it cost him Goeth, actually. But yes, I get it. As in, goeth f%#* yourself? Who are you Bill Shakespeare?
|
|
ftd
Junior
"I think real leaders show up when times are hard." Trent Bray 11/29/2023
Posts: 2,517
|
Post by ftd on Oct 15, 2023 15:50:53 GMT -8
What is it with *uck head FB coaches? 'Going for it' seems to be a hold over from Chip's days....When he had a new take on risky/hurry up plays that are now more common place and somewhat been negated by rule changes (if the O does a line change, hold the game so the D can do the same etc). In his day it was a revolution and hard to stop...
Since Chippy the *ucks hire HC that 'just go for it' without regard to logic...Mario 'no knees' Cristobal and Dan '4th down' Lanning just don't seem to know how execute 'in game'. Keep it up suckers!
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Oct 15, 2023 15:56:45 GMT -8
What is it with *uck head FB coaches? 'Going for it' seems to be a hold over from Chip's days....When he had a new take on risky/hurry up plays that are now more common place and somewhat been negated by rule changes (if the O does a line change, hold the game so the D can do the same etc). In his day it was a revolution and hard to stop... Since Chippy the *ucks hire HC that 'just go for it' without regard to logic...Mario 'no knees' Cristobal and Dan '4th down' Lanning just don't seem to know how execute 'in game'. Keep it up suckers! Have you met our HC? It’s the new analytics game.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Oct 15, 2023 16:19:26 GMT -8
Goeth, actually. But yes, I get it. As in, goeth f%#* yourself? Who are you Bill Shakespeare? Around here they call me Will…
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Oct 15, 2023 16:21:29 GMT -8
What is it with *uck head FB coaches? 'Going for it' seems to be a hold over from Chip's days....When he had a new take on risky/hurry up plays that are now more common place and somewhat been negated by rule changes (if the O does a line change, hold the game so the D can do the same etc). In his day it was a revolution and hard to stop... Since Chippy the *ucks hire HC that 'just go for it' without regard to logic...Mario 'no knees' Cristobal and Dan '4th down' Lanning just don't seem to know how execute 'in game'. Keep it up suckers! getyarn.io/yarn-clip/33672a77-bc1a-4d48-8c74-21c900512845
|
|
ftd
Junior
"I think real leaders show up when times are hard." Trent Bray 11/29/2023
Posts: 2,517
|
Post by ftd on Oct 15, 2023 16:39:19 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Oct 15, 2023 17:38:54 GMT -8
I wasnt rooting for them but that was dumb in my opinion . Anyone think he's going to get any smarter?
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Oct 15, 2023 17:40:21 GMT -8
Goeth, actually. But yes, I get it. As in, goeth f%#* yourself? Who are you Bill Shakespeare?
|
|
bill82
Sophomore
OSU's 10,157th Best Donor
Posts: 1,009
|
Post by bill82 on Oct 15, 2023 17:51:38 GMT -8
I wasnt rooting for them but that was dumb in my opinion . I think we wanted the Scmucks to win from a strategic perspective. I'm guessing the odds are we have a better chance of beating UW at our house, than winning in Eugene. And if UW lost to UO and then us, we have the two loss tie breaker over them, and a possible spot in Pac-12 championship. Now if we beat UW they could be a one-loss team and if we lose to Ducks we become a two loss team watching UO and UW play again.] We need to beat UW and UO now to get in.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Oct 15, 2023 17:53:52 GMT -8
I wasnt rooting for them but that was dumb in my opinion . I think we wanted the Scmucks to win from a strategic perspective. I'm guessing the odds are we have a better chance of beating UW at our house, than winning in Eugene. And if UW lost to UO and then us, we have the two loss tie breaker over them, and a possible spot in Pac-12 championship. Now if we beat UW they could be a one-loss team and if we lose to Ducks we become a two loss team watching UO and UW play again.] We need to beat UW and UO now to get in. I don't care about any of that...stuff. I just enjoy watching the *ucks lose. However it works out is how it works out. I don't want our destiny to depend on the *ucks help.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 15, 2023 23:03:56 GMT -8
I wasnt rooting for them but that was dumb in my opinion . I think we wanted the Scmucks to win from a strategic perspective. I'm guessing the odds are we have a better chance of beating UW at our house, than winning in Eugene. And if UW lost to UO and then us, we have the two loss tie breaker over them, and a possible spot in Pac-12 championship. Now if we beat UW they could be a one-loss team and if we lose to Ducks we become a two loss team watching UO and UW play again.] We need to beat UW and UO now to get in. I was trying to figure out what you were talking about, but I believe that you are correct. It should be easier to beat Washington in Corvallis than Oregon in Eugene. None of the other teams are likely to finish with fewer than two losses, although it is still possible.
You come to the wrong conclusion, though. Washington's win over Oregon makes the Civil War far more important than the Washington game; whereas, if Oregon had defeated Washington, the reverse would be true. That would have been an awful perfunctory Civil War to set up the Civil War that matters in Vegas.
The scenario that you set up, though, would be a Civil War to play Washington in the rematch in Vegas.
Still a lot of football to be played, though, so we'll see.
|
|
|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Oct 16, 2023 7:09:55 GMT -8
This morning on my 15 minute commute to work, it was actually pretty satisfying listening to Justin Meyers on Rip City Radio cry about his ducks losing. The entire 15 minutes was him trying to justify/analyze Lannings decisions.....of course he brought up the u dub loss, and Beavers loss last season......nothing sweeter than arrogant duck fan tears.
|
|
|
Post by ochobeavo on Oct 16, 2023 7:20:45 GMT -8
I think we wanted the Scmucks to win from a strategic perspective. I'm guessing the odds are we have a better chance of beating UW at our house, than winning in Eugene. And if UW lost to UO and then us, we have the two loss tie breaker over them, and a possible spot in Pac-12 championship. Now if we beat UW they could be a one-loss team and if we lose to Ducks we become a two loss team watching UO and UW play again.] We need to beat UW and UO now to get in. I was trying to figure out what you were talking about, but I believe that you are correct. It should be easier to beat Washington in Corvallis than Oregon in Eugene. None of the other teams are likely to finish with fewer than two losses, although it is still possible.
You come to the wrong conclusion, though. Washington's win over Oregon makes the Civil War far more important than the Washington game; whereas, if Oregon had defeated Washington, the reverse would be true. That would have been an awful perfunctory Civil War to set up the Civil War that matters in Vegas.
The scenario that you set up, though, would be a Civil War to play Washington in the rematch in Vegas.
Still a lot of football to be played, though, so we'll see.If you go by Massey ratings, they give Beavs 32% chance at Oregon, 46% vs Washington (FWIW - 91% Stanford, 80% Colorado, 70% Arizona). Zona seems way too high to me... UW favored in remainder of their games (their road games vs USC/OSU will be the tough ones on the schedule) Oregon favored rest of the way but have a tough road game at Utah. USC has Utah, Washington, Oregon, UCLA on the schedule. That might be 3-4 losses. With all of that said, Just Win Baby!!!
|
|
|
Post by NativeBeav on Oct 16, 2023 11:15:28 GMT -8
I was trying to figure out what you were talking about, but I believe that you are correct. It should be easier to beat Washington in Corvallis than Oregon in Eugene. None of the other teams are likely to finish with fewer than two losses, although it is still possible.
You come to the wrong conclusion, though. Washington's win over Oregon makes the Civil War far more important than the Washington game; whereas, if Oregon had defeated Washington, the reverse would be true. That would have been an awful perfunctory Civil War to set up the Civil War that matters in Vegas.
The scenario that you set up, though, would be a Civil War to play Washington in the rematch in Vegas.
Still a lot of football to be played, though, so we'll see. If you go by Massey ratings, they give Beavs 32% chance at Oregon, 46% vs Washington (FWIW - 91% Stanford, 80% Colorado, 70% Arizona). Zona seems way too high to me... UW favored in remainder of their games (their road games vs USC/OSU will be the tough ones on the schedule) Oregon favored rest of the way but have a tough road game at Utah. USC has Utah, Washington, Oregon, UCLA on the schedule. That might be 3-4 losses. With all of that said, Just Win Baby!!! So, question for the board - does hole come out in Rice Eccles Stadium with their hair on fire, or does Utah do to Oregon what they have done to many opponents in the past? Utah may be hurting on offense, but their defense is still pretty good. Here's to hoping they are looking down the road to USC and playing us!
|
|