|
|
Post by beaver1989 on Apr 2, 2022 9:49:21 GMT -8
have some kryptonite going against our hitters.
We've been shutout in 3 of our last four against these guys.
1-0 loss in game one last year
5-0 loss in game two last year
9-1 win in game three last year
1-0 loss in game one this year
We need to get our bats going today.
Go Beavs.
|
|
|
|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Apr 2, 2022 10:03:06 GMT -8
Nothing like a solid pac 12 staff to cool off ur bats. Furd is legit, and could be scary if they get their offense going.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Apr 2, 2022 10:03:30 GMT -8
have some kryptonite going against our hitters. We've been shutout in 3 of our last four against these guys. 1-0 loss in game one last year 5-0 loss in game two last year 9-1 win in game three last year 1-0 loss in game one this year We need to get our bats going today. Go Beavs. It is galling to have outscored Stanford over the past four games and be 1-3 in the win-loss column. |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Apr 2, 2022 10:07:36 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance.
Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again.
|
|
|
|
Post by beavaristotle on Apr 2, 2022 10:16:41 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance. Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again. according to Parker on the postgame, Stanford’s closer is starting today |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Apr 2, 2022 10:18:27 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance. Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again. according to Parker on the postgame, Stanford’s closer is starting today Good. As a starter, I trust our guys to figure him out. He threw hard last night and seemed to overwhelm the batters seeing him for the first time. |
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 2, 2022 10:24:20 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance. Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again. I don’t like the pitch clock, but the ump was allowing the pitcher to go 25-30 seconds, but ordering the hitter into the box immediately. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Apr 2, 2022 10:29:16 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance. Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again. Stanford's closer in game one is the Cardinal's usual Saturday starter: Quinn Mathews Stanford Low-90s fastball with a good changeup and a slider. Blanked Arkansas, Northridge and Wazzu. Good outing against Zona. Got shelled by Oregon. Mathews is probably the third-best pitcher that Oregon State will face in Pac-12 play. Let's hope that we can do what Oregon did to him. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Apr 2, 2022 10:36:30 GMT -8
Legit? If Alex “let me wander around here for 20 seconds before I set up to pitch” Williams was legit, then how do you define Hjerpe’s performance. Our hitting was off. I don’t think Stanford’s pitching was all that special…except their closer. He shut the door quickly against quality batters. I hope we don’t need to see him again. I don’t like the pitch clock, but the ump was allowing the pitcher to go 25-30 seconds, but ordering the hitter into the box immediately. First, the pitch clock isn't automatically started. Delays by the batter or the pitcher returning from fielding or backing up delays the start, etc. But, most importantly it's only used when the bases are unoccupied. And, some umpires "hurry" batters into position as the pitch clock begins when the pitcher has the ball on the mound. And batters aren't to delay the start of the pitching motion. There is lots involved. Too much IMHO... here is a basic summary: baseballrulesacademy.com/official-rule/ncaa/ncaa-appendix-f-pitch-between-innings-clock-protocol/ |
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 2, 2022 10:49:14 GMT -8
I don’t like the pitch clock, but the ump was allowing the pitcher to go 25-30 seconds, but ordering the hitter into the box immediately. First, the pitch clock isn't automatically started. Delays by the batter or the pitcher returning from fielding or backing up delays the start, etc. But, most importantly it's only used when the bases are unoccupied. And, some umpires "hurry" batters into position as the pitch clock begins when the pitcher has the ball on the mound. And batters aren't to delay the start of the pitching motion. There is lots involved. Too much IMHO... here is a basic summary: baseballrulesacademy.com/official-rule/ncaa/ncaa-appendix-f-pitch-between-innings-clock-protocol/Except for the important fact that the rule was amended in 2021 to include situations with the runner on base. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Apr 2, 2022 11:45:29 GMT -8
First, the pitch clock isn't automatically started. Delays by the batter or the pitcher returning from fielding or backing up delays the start, etc. But, most importantly it's only used when the bases are unoccupied. And, some umpires "hurry" batters into position as the pitch clock begins when the pitcher has the ball on the mound. And batters aren't to delay the start of the pitching motion. There is lots involved. Too much IMHO... here is a basic summary: baseballrulesacademy.com/official-rule/ncaa/ncaa-appendix-f-pitch-between-innings-clock-protocol/Except for the important fact that the rule was amended in 2021 to include situations with the runner on base. It was, but runners have to be returned to base after leads, foul balls, etc. The HP ump has the discretion on when he starts or pauses the on field clock. The only reason there is a clock is that umpires were inconsistent in their enforcement. The visual clock makes it more "public", in view. Byr, still the ump in charge of the clock (bases if no visual field clock) has a lot of discretion. The system is just too convoluted and the visual clock leads to the stupid fan count downs. IMHO that's just not part of this game. |
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 2, 2022 12:12:48 GMT -8
Except for the important fact that the rule was amended in 2021 to include situations with the runner on base. It was, but runners have to be returned to base after leads, foul balls, etc. The HP ump has the discretion on when he starts or pauses the on field clock. The only reason there is a clock is that umpires were inconsistent in their enforcement. The visual clock makes it more "public", in view. Byr, still the ump in charge of the clock (bases if no visual field clock) has a lot of discretion. The system is just too convoluted and the visual clock leads to the stupid fan count downs. IMHO that's just not part of this game. So the students are having fun counting down. A travesty I tell you, a travesty. |
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 2, 2022 12:15:37 GMT -8
Also, you quoted the old rule specifically in your initial post citing the runner on base situation. You did not know the rule change. Period. I call bull again.
|
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 2, 2022 12:17:41 GMT -8
Finally, rgeorge, is Hjerpe at last a quality Pac12 starter in your eyes yet? You stated in earlier posts that he wasn’t.
|
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Apr 2, 2022 12:26:22 GMT -8
Finally, rgeorge, is Hjerpe at last a quality Pac12 starter in your eyes yet? You stated in earlier posts that he wasn’t. Cut & paste that please. |
|
