|
Post by grayman on Mar 25, 2024 18:33:53 GMT -8
Can you go over it one more time please? I'm interested in discussing different aspects of the Oregon State women's basketball team. If that includes something that's potentially negative about SR or a player(s), I don't care. It's sports. I have no interest in being another OSU fan who wants to believe TVO is an elite player or something like that. I point out plenty of positives. I'm just not delusional about this team.
|
|
|
Post by beaveragain on Mar 25, 2024 18:35:37 GMT -8
Can you go over it one more time please? Come on. Someone puts time and thought into putting something together. If you don't find it interesting then move on. If you don't agree then say something. Drive by shootings really do not improve the world.
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Mar 25, 2024 18:38:27 GMT -8
Can you go over it one more time please? Come on. Someone puts time and thought into putting something together. If you don't find it interesting then move on. If you don't agree then say something. Drive by shootings really do not improve the world. Well said. Much better than my response.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 25, 2024 18:50:54 GMT -8
Come on. Someone puts time and thought into putting something together. If you don't find it interesting then move on. If you don't agree then say something. Drive by shootings really do not improve the world. Well said. Much better than my response.
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Mar 25, 2024 18:54:05 GMT -8
Well said. Much better than my response. The only good thing about this post is I get to see Frank Bonnema again
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 25, 2024 19:21:23 GMT -8
The only good thing about this post is I get to see Frank Bonnema again I don't mean to be too harsh. We're all Beaver fans. And certainly no player is above criticism, and having her game critiqued and analyzed. It just seemed to me after the 5th post in this thread (I actually counted) making the same point it had gotten redundant. And for the sake of argument, let's just say you PROVED your thesis with airtight logic, demolishing any alternate conclusions. In the end whether or not AJ starts and how many minutes she plays is still entirely up to Rueck. And I don't think he reads this board. Anyhow. Go Beavs. BEAT NOTRE DAME!
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Mar 25, 2024 19:45:02 GMT -8
The only good thing about this post is I get to see Frank Bonnema again I don't mean to be too harsh. We're all Beaver fans. And certainly no player is above criticism, and having her game critiqued and analyzed. It just seemed to me after the 5th post in this thread (I actually counted) making the same point it had gotten redundant. And for the sake of argument, let's just say you PROVED your thesis with airtight logic, demolishing any alternate conclusions. In the end whether or not AJ starts and how many minutes she plays is still entirely up to Rueck. And I don't think he reads this board. Anyhow. Go Beavs. BEAT NOTRE DAME! The thing is, that last post was intended to be my final one on the subject (that's why I started it the way I did). The only reason I even added it was I thought it would be interesting to look at how much Rueck played AJ in the games without Raegan. So the conclusion was that Rueck was actually playing her less in those games, which I really thought showed that I wasn't completely right when it came to my assumption about his view of AJ. Agree that he doesn't read this board. Anyway, thanks for your comment.
|
|
|
Post by rmancarl on Mar 25, 2024 19:45:05 GMT -8
I'm not one of those people who don't care much about who starts. The Beavs went all season last year without Raegan starting, and this year without Timea starting. When it comes to minutes played, AJ sits at 6th on the team, so she is a starter, but doesn't play the minutes other starters do. AJ has pretty good scoring numbers in non-conference play but struggles to score against Pac-12 talent. As the year has gone along, both Dom and Lily have earned more minutes. Looking at next year, I'm fine with whoever starts, and if that is Dom there is no doubt she will add offensive aggressiveness, (as would Adlee).
|
|