|
Post by chinmusic on Apr 1, 2018 17:36:04 GMT -8
Taking a look at Oregon State offensively after 25 games, the Beavers generally have been very efficient by college baseball standards. Heading into the two game date with UNR on Monday, they have a team BA of .29959, or .300. They have produced 222 base hits in 741 at bats, with 96 BB and 18 HBP. Of their 222 hits, 73 have been for extra bases, including 50 doubles, 6 triples and 17 home runs. Statistically, they have been comparatively impressive.
With any offense, you are always looking for any tweak you can make to improve it. Several areas might be open for discussion. First would be to cut down the number of strikeouts, understanding that getting deep in the count usually dictates you are going to be taking some marginal strikes. Pitch selection is key in hitting for average and strike outs can often be a hazard of strike zone discipline. Reducing the number of K’s, especially with runners on base should always be a goal at OSU.
Second, staying out of the double play has been elusive this year. Easier said than done, but we have experienced too many run-killing opportunities and the LOB numbers are indicative of that. The situation of score and inning dictate strategy, but the steal, sacrifice, hit and run, and keeping the ball on the lines and out of the middle of the diamond can help counter the DP ball.
Third as a subject worthy of discussion would be the batting order. Personally, I would like to see the Beavs take advantage of players swinging a “hot” bat. Mr. Armstrong comes to mind. Young Andy is in the vernacular of MLB scouts, “squared up” on the pitch. His contact has been flush and he’s driving the ball. He also appears to be full of confidence at the plate. I think moving him up into the 2-hole hitting might be an option for the staff. Grenier has been fine hitting behind Kwan but there are a couple of reasons I would consider the move.
I like Caydn hitting at the second lead-off spot, 7th in the order. He gives you several benefits. He will hit for a decent average and is currently at .296 for the year. He is adept at drawing walks and pretending to avoid being HBP (13 BB and 4 HBP). His .479 OBP is demonstrative of his ability to get on base. He also gives us some “punch” in the bottom third of the order. He has a slugging % of .436 which for a SS of his caliber is unusual. Finally, a slight negative in hitting second, he works the count and takes a high number of pitches which have resulted in 20 strike outs, or 1 in every 4.7 at bats. Comparatively, Armstrong strikes out every .022 trips to the plate (3 K’s in 67 at bats). Ideally, your number 2 hitter wants to put the ball in play with Kwan’s speed on base.
Armstrong’s BA has been steadily rising over the last 15 games and he’s currently hitting .313 following a good series at Utah. His OB% is now .418 and his slugging % is .448 with 7 doubles, a triple and a homer. In addition, Andy has proven to be a willing and capable bunter. Both players are capable of hitting behind Kwan but the net effect of this change is more contact and far fewer strikeouts in the 2-hole.
There are some additional personnel and lineup options available to the coaches that might strengthen the offense and I’ll post those later.
|
|
|
Post by 56chevy on Apr 1, 2018 18:36:20 GMT -8
This is the most balanced offfensive lineup 1 through 9 we've had in 10 years. It's about to get even better in the next week with the return of Nick.
It's not broke, don't fix it.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Apr 1, 2018 19:03:06 GMT -8
Taking a look at Oregon State offensively after 25 games, the Beavers generally have been very efficient by college baseball standards. Heading into the two game date with UNR on Monday, they have a team BA of .29959, or .300. They have produced 222 base hits in 741 at bats, with 96 BB and 18 HBP. Of their 222 hits, 73 have been for extra bases, including 50 doubles, 6 triples and 17 home runs. Statistically, they have been comparatively impressive. With any offense, you are always looking for any tweak you can make to improve it. Several areas might be open for discussion. First would be to cut down the number of strikeouts, understanding that getting deep in the count usually dictates you are going to be taking some marginal strikes. Pitch selection is key in hitting for average and strike outs can often be a hazard of strike zone discipline. Reducing the number of K’s, especially with runners on base should always be a goal at OSU. Second, staying out of the double play has been elusive this year. Easier said than done, but we have experienced too many run-killing opportunities and the LOB numbers are indicative of that. The situation of score and inning dictate strategy, but the steal, sacrifice, hit and run, and keeping the ball on the lines and out of the middle of the diamond can help counter the DP ball. Third as a subject worthy of discussion would be the batting order. Personally, I would like to see the Beavs take advantage of players swinging a “hot” bat. Mr. Armstrong comes to mind. Young Andy is in the vernacular of MLB scouts, “squared up” on the pitch. His contact has been flush and he’s driving the ball. He also appears to be full of confidence at the plate. I think moving him up into the 2-hole hitting might be an option for the staff. Grenier has been fine hitting behind Kwan but there are a couple of reasons I would consider the move. I like Caydn hitting at the second lead-off spot, 7th in the order. He gives you several benefits. He will hit for a decent average and is currently at .296 for the year. He is adept at drawing walks and pretending to avoid being HBP (13 BB and 4 HBP). His .479 OBP is demonstrative of his ability to get on base. He also gives us some “punch” in the bottom third of the order. He has a slugging % of .436 which for a SS of his caliber is unusual. Finally, a slight negative in hitting second, he works the count and takes a high number of pitches which have resulted in 20 strike outs, or 1 in every 4.7 at bats. Comparatively, Armstrong strikes out every .022 trips to the plate (3 K’s in 67 at bats). Ideally, your number 2 hitter wants to put the ball in play with Kwan’s speed on base. Armstrong’s BA has been steadily rising over the last 15 games and he’s currently hitting .313 following a good series at Utah. His OB% is now .418 and his slugging % is .448 with 7 doubles, a triple and a homer. In addition, Andy has proven to be a willing and capable bunter. Both players are capable of hitting behind Kwan but the net effect of this change is more contact and far fewer strikeouts in the 2-hole. There are some additional personnel and lineup options available to the coaches that might strengthen the offense and I’ll post those later. Not sure where those stats are from but, they are outdated, and not the 25 game totals... BA is .315... 841 ABs... 265 H... 85 xbh... 117 BB... 21 HBP... etc And, not sure you coach, read books etc, but the 7 hole is not, never been the "2nd lead off". Just FYI the widely scripted roles in the batting order... with decisions made by coaches that know their talent: The leadoff hitter The typical leadoff hitter can usually run... has a high on base percentage, potential for a good average... takes walks... can handle the bat by bunting, good hit and run guy, and doesn’t strike out a lot. The 2, 8, and 9 hitters Are the table setters... they can handle the bat... be able to bunt, situationaly hit (H & R, ball to the right side, sacfly to advance runners)... battle counts, foul off pitches. The number 3 hitter Usually your best in the lineup... have a unique blend of BA and power... drives in runners The 4 and 5 guys Usually power guys that may strike out more than the others in the lineup but have long ball potential. Every time they step in the box they could leave the yard... 5 guy should prob be a BA to avoid 4 guy from being pitched around. The 6 and 7 guys Very good hitters usually high average with less power than the 3,4,5 guys... need to protect the power spots... can have big RBI potential. Again... tweak as talent allows. But, the 7 spot is an RBI spot... 2,8,9 are the other table setting lead off types. AA has had a good run, others are struggling some, but only Taylor is a guy that doesn't fit. Not sure that AA will continue vs better pitching...
|
|
|
Post by justdamwin on Apr 1, 2018 19:25:45 GMT -8
Taking a look at Oregon State offensively after 25 games, the Beavers generally have been very efficient by college baseball standards. Heading into the two game date with UNR on Monday, they have a team BA of .29959, or .300. They have produced 222 base hits in 741 at bats, with 96 BB and 18 HBP. Of their 222 hits, 73 have been for extra bases, including 50 doubles, 6 triples and 17 home runs. Statistically, they have been comparatively impressive. With any offense, you are always looking for any tweak you can make to improve it. Several areas might be open for discussion. First would be to cut down the number of strikeouts, understanding that getting deep in the count usually dictates you are going to be taking some marginal strikes. Pitch selection is key in hitting for average and strike outs can often be a hazard of strike zone discipline. Reducing the number of K’s, especially with runners on base should always be a goal at OSU. Second, staying out of the double play has been elusive this year. Easier said than done, but we have experienced too many run-killing opportunities and the LOB numbers are indicative of that. The situation of score and inning dictate strategy, but the steal, sacrifice, hit and run, and keeping the ball on the lines and out of the middle of the diamond can help counter the DP ball. Third as a subject worthy of discussion would be the batting order. Personally, I would like to see the Beavs take advantage of players swinging a “hot” bat. Mr. Armstrong comes to mind. Young Andy is in the vernacular of MLB scouts, “squared up” on the pitch. His contact has been flush and he’s driving the ball. He also appears to be full of confidence at the plate. I think moving him up into the 2-hole hitting might be an option for the staff. Grenier has been fine hitting behind Kwan but there are a couple of reasons I would consider the move. I like Caydn hitting at the second lead-off spot, 7th in the order. He gives you several benefits. He will hit for a decent average and is currently at .296 for the year. He is adept at drawing walks and pretending to avoid being HBP (13 BB and 4 HBP). His .479 OBP is demonstrative of his ability to get on base. He also gives us some “punch” in the bottom third of the order. He has a slugging % of .436 which for a SS of his caliber is unusual. Finally, a slight negative in hitting second, he works the count and takes a high number of pitches which have resulted in 20 strike outs, or 1 in every 4.7 at bats. Comparatively, Armstrong strikes out every .022 trips to the plate (3 K’s in 67 at bats). Ideally, your number 2 hitter wants to put the ball in play with Kwan’s speed on base. Armstrong’s BA has been steadily rising over the last 15 games and he’s currently hitting .313 following a good series at Utah. His OB% is now .418 and his slugging % is .448 with 7 doubles, a triple and a homer. In addition, Andy has proven to be a willing and capable bunter. Both players are capable of hitting behind Kwan but the net effect of this change is more contact and far fewer strikeouts in the 2-hole. There are some additional personnel and lineup options available to the coaches that might strengthen the offense and I’ll post those later. Not sure where those stats are from but, they are outdated, and not the 25 game totals... BA is .315... 841 ABs... 265 H... 85 xbh... 117 BB... 21 HBP... etc And, not sure you coach, read books etc, but the 7 hole is not, never been the "2nd lead off". Just FYI the widely scripted roles in the batting order... with decisions made by coaches that know their talent: The leadoff hitter The typical leadoff hitter can usually run... has a high on base percentage, potential for a good average... takes walks... can handle the bat by bunting, good hit and run guy, and doesn’t strike out a lot. The 2, 8, and 9 hitters Are the table setters... they can handle the bat... be able to bunt, situationaly hit (H & R, ball to the right side, sacfly to advance runners)... battle counts, foul off pitches. The number 3 hitter Usually your best in the lineup... have a unique blend of BA and power... drives in runners The 4 and 5 guys Usually power guys that may strike out more than the others in the lineup but have long ball potential. Every time they step in the box they could leave the yard... 5 guy should prob be a BA to avoid 4 guy from being pitched around. The 6 and 7 guys Very good hitters usually high average with less power than the 3,4,5 guys... need to protect the power spots... can have big RBI potential. Again... tweak as talent allows. But, the 7 spot is an RBI spot... 2,8,9 are the other table setting lead off types. AA has had a good run, others are struggling some, but only Taylor is a guy that doesn't fit. Not sure that AA will continue vs better pitching... That is the classic approach. The sabremetrics approach places your statistically “best” hitter in the two slot. Not a bat control guy, unless they’re one in the same. Not saying I subscribe to Sabre but you do see it employed at times in modern baseball. It’s not a “small ball” lineup which is a consideration in college baseball with the current ball and bat restrictions. I will say a two guy with power is a great luxury. Oregon states offense isn’t the problem and if Madrigal comes back in preinjury form that offense should score runs.
|
|