|
|
Post by texasbeaver on Mar 21, 2018 13:10:12 GMT -8
|
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,837 
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on Mar 21, 2018 14:15:06 GMT -8
Great Eggers piece, as always. Good journalism is not dead, it just doesn't exist at one of the other Portland papers I have come to detest.....I digress.
Why do I get the feeling Mulkey was really saying "I hope we score 140 on these pesky #$*^%%^*#$#$ Beavers"?
I really enjoy the fact the WBB team has exhibited "staying power" in the Tournament over the SR era.
MBB was fun to follow, but in all my years at OSU they were a "one and done" outfit.
There is something to be said for getting a week or two of postseason to reflect on how good your team is, how great a season they have had, how much growth the players have undergone.......all the while plotting your team's progression through your (otherwise busted) bracket.
Thank you Beavers!
|
|
|
|
Post by believeinthebeavs on Mar 21, 2018 16:13:56 GMT -8
Eggers did an amazing job of making Mulkey sound like a real human being, he deserves a Pulitzer prize for that!
|
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Mar 21, 2018 16:40:58 GMT -8
Great Eggers piece, as always. Good journalism is not dead, it just doesn't exist at one of the other Portland papers I have come to detest.....I digress. Why do I get the feeling Mulkey was really saying "I hope we score 140 on these pesky #$*^%%^*#$#$ Beavers"? I really enjoy the fact the WBB team has exhibited "staying power" in the Tournament over the SR era. MBB was fun to follow, but in all my years at OSU they were a "one and done" outfit. There is something to be said for getting a week or two of postseason to reflect on how good your team is, how great a season they have had, how much growth the players have undergone.......all the while plotting your team's progression through your (otherwise busted) bracket. Thank you Beavers! She probably was thinking just that, but she knows to be respectful of the Beavers - and well, it is a competitive sport! |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Mar 21, 2018 16:45:22 GMT -8
I know that Mulkey is Lil Sweet's (LSU's ss) mom, but are we sure that she is not related to the ASU coach? They both have the "crazy" eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Mar 21, 2018 21:27:10 GMT -8
Dammit, Eggers......I was perfectly content loathing Baylor’s coach. Now, I’m going to have to adapt to simply disliking her antics. Damn you!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 21, 2018 21:47:19 GMT -8
Eggers did an amazing job of making Mulkey sound like a real human being, he deserves a Pulitzer prize for that! I guess you can make a silk purse out of sow's ear. |
|
|
|
Post by blueheron on Mar 22, 2018 11:53:47 GMT -8
I really enjoy the fact the WBB team has exhibited "staying power" in the Tournament over the SR era. MBB was fun to follow, but in all my years at OSU they were a "one and done" outfit. That's because Rueck is the best basketball coach in OSU history. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 22, 2018 12:14:02 GMT -8
I really enjoy the fact the WBB team has exhibited "staying power" in the Tournament over the SR era. MBB was fun to follow, but in all my years at OSU they were a "one and done" outfit. That's because Rueck is the best basketball coach in OSU history. Best women’s basketball coach in OSU history. The best coach is the guy whose name is on the building they play in. |
|
|
|
Post by seastape on Mar 22, 2018 14:02:04 GMT -8
That's because Rueck is the best basketball coach in OSU history. Best women’s basketball coach in OSU history. The best coach is the guy whose name is on the building they play in. I think one could argue that Rueck is better. Rueck took over a dumpster fire of a team with four scholarship players and in his fourth year made it into the second round of the NCAAs. He did the same in his fifth year and for the three seasons since, he has made the Sweet 16 every year with one Final Four. Miller never had that kind of track record. |
|
|
|
Post by jefframp on Mar 22, 2018 14:06:17 GMT -8
Best women’s basketball coach in OSU history. The best coach is the guy whose name is on the building they play in. I think one could argue that Rueck is better. Rueck took over a dumpster fire of a team with four scholarship players and in his fourth year made it into the second round of the NCAAs. He did the same in his fifth year and for the three seasons since, he has made the Sweet 16 every year with one Final Four. Miller never had that kind of track record. The building is named Gill. Two Final Fours for Slats. The way Scott has been going he will be in that rarefied air soon though. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 22, 2018 14:25:59 GMT -8
I think one could argue that Rueck is better. Rueck took over a dumpster fire of a team with four scholarship players and in his fourth year made it into the second round of the NCAAs. He did the same in his fifth year and for the three seasons since, he has made the Sweet 16 every year with one Final Four. Miller never had that kind of track record. The building is named Gill. Two Final Fours for Slats. The way Scott has been going he will be in that rarefied air soon though. 5 conference championships for Gill. Likely at least one more had not OSU been conference-less his last 5 years from 1960 through 1964 (includes 1963 Final Four team). Rueck's got a little way to go yet to match that. |
|
|
|
Post by seastape on Mar 22, 2018 16:23:53 GMT -8
I think one could argue that Rueck is better. Rueck took over a dumpster fire of a team with four scholarship players and in his fourth year made it into the second round of the NCAAs. He did the same in his fifth year and for the three seasons since, he has made the Sweet 16 every year with one Final Four. Miller never had that kind of track record. The building is named Gill. Two Final Fours for Slats. The way Scott has been going he will be in that rarefied air soon though. Oops! My (very) bad! I think the argument can still be made, given Gill's past record... |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 22, 2018 16:29:38 GMT -8
The building is named Gill. Two Final Fours for Slats. The way Scott has been going he will be in that rarefied air soon though. Oops! My (very) bad! I think the argument can still be made, given Gill's past record... You can argue anything. But in this case I don't think it's a winning argument. |
|
