Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2018 21:09:55 GMT -8
So, good win by the beavs (top row below) but you can see it was predictable because the officials called more fouls on the fuskies than on the Beavers. With the exception of the february 10th game EVERY beaver conference win (and LOSS) fit the formula of BF>OF = L BF<OF = w
Sure you think, beavers lose when they play bad defense and commit too many fouls, but every game? (18 of 19?) Or is it more likely Pac 12 officials are influencing the win loss outcome with prejudiced officiating?
BF OF
w 19 26
w 14 19
L 21 15
w 23 25
L 21 18
L 18 16
L 24 18
w 19 15
w 17 21
L 29 22
L 27 25
L 20 17
L 25 19
w 17 21
L 21 13
L 16 11
w 15 20
L 17 12
w 18 19
|
|
|
Post by TheGlove on Mar 7, 2018 21:34:55 GMT -8
So, good win by the beavs (top row below) but you can see it was predictable because the officials called more fouls on the fuskies than on the Beavers. With the exception of the february 10th game EVERY beaver conference win (and LOSS) fit the formula of BF>OF = L BF<OF = w Sure you think, beavers lose when they play bad defense and commit too many fouls, but every game? (18 of 19?) Or is it more likely Pac 12 officials are influencing the win loss outcome with prejudiced officiating? BF OF w 19 26 w 14 19
L 21 15 w 23 25 L 21 18 L 18 16 L 24 18 w 19 15 w 17 21 L 29 22 L 27 25 L 20 17 L 25 19 w 17 21 L 21 13 L 16 11 w 15 20 L 17 12 w 18 19 Waaaaaaaaay too much math. 👎🏼
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2018 21:43:27 GMT -8
So, good win by the beavs (top row below) but you can see it was predictable because the officials called more fouls on the fuskies than on the Beavers. With the exception of the february 10th game EVERY beaver conference win (and LOSS) fit the formula of BF>OF = L BF<OF = w Sure you think, beavers lose when they play bad defense and commit too many fouls, but every game? (18 of 19?) Or is it more likely Pac 12 officials are influencing the win loss outcome with prejudiced officiating? BF OF w 19 26 w 14 19
L 21 15 w 23 25 L 21 18 L 18 16 L 24 18 w 19 15 w 17 21 L 29 22 L 27 25 L 20 17 L 25 19 w 17 21 L 21 13 L 16 11 w 15 20 L 17 12 w 18 19 Waaaaaaaaay too much math. 👎🏼 Every frrricking time
|
|