AA/OSU Mention in Article

When I was a freshman at OSU, I took a weightlifting class.  At the start of the class I weighed 135 pounds and could bench press 130 pounds.  We were supposed to show improvement by the end of the term.  At the end of the term, I weighed 135 pounds and could bench press 130 pounds.  So S&C doesn't always do any good.  I dare say I had more testosterone in my system than these ladies, so don't get your hopes up.

"I would guess these ladies are about a thousand times more motivated than you were "

Lol. +1

Everyone assumes that if you tell a personal story about how basically weak you are, you are OK with a little ribbing about it.

Hmmm, I really shouldn't have to explain my logic again.  The "ducks" didn't lose:  The "ducks MINUS Bando" lost.  It's simple logic, and I should know since I got a B in Algebra I:

     Ducks - Bando < Ducks, assuming "Bando" is a positive quantity.

And the Patriots didn't lose the Superbowl, either.  The "Patriots - Cooks" lost.  It's simple math:

     Patriots - Cooks < Patriots, by the same reasoning.

Am I the only one in the world with such astoundingly good reasoning skills?

To be honest, I was predicting the Yucks would run the table based on their talent, but they have underperformed.  With players like Hebard, Sabally, Maguire, Ionescu, Cazorla, and Bando, I figured they would dominate.  I don't LIKE the Yucks, but I figured I'd have to live with their dominance.  Losing Bando hurt them, and that may have been the difference in their 2 losses (to OSU and Stanford).  Let me reiterate:  I want nothing but disgrace and humiliation for the ugly birds down south.  Next year, with Slocum and Jazz and a couple bigs, along with all our current outside shooting and experience, I truly expect that WE could run the table in the Pac-12, depending mostly on how fast our bigs can emulate Marie Gulich (which is a tall order, but there ARE 2 of them).

Stanford, Oregon, and UCLA are the big players at this time.  Next year, UCLA will have been decimated by graduation, so their younger players, even if talented, won't be nearly as good early.  Stanford is 19-8 and Oregon is 23-4:  Hardly world-class and definitely consistently beatable by a team the caliber of UCONN.  The other teams are definitely beatable, so your claim resolves to an assertion that OSU can't beat UO and Stanford twice each and handle the lesser teams, too, next year, or the year after, or the year after.  THAT is a stretch.