|
Post by COBeav on Jun 26, 2017 7:51:08 GMT -8
Very rationale post jrock, with just a couple items from me, for what they're worth.
You said, "Conclusion: Pat Casey's decision to decline review ended up being a big mistake since 2 runs possibly score......" I contend he didn't "decline" to review the play, he just wasn't emphatic enough to ASK for a review. Seems he went out and was told in no uncertain terms by the umps that the ball was foul and he accepted that answer. He shouldn't have in real time, but he did. I've been asking how our third base coach missed the fair/foul ball, where was he and why didn't he see it. It also seems to me that in a reviewable call where the head coach goes out to question it, somebody should have requested a review be it umps, or coaches.
I agree with this as well, you said: "Gilbert threw around 105 pitches and 70 were strikes. All 70 strikes were not in the other batters box where they couldn't be hit." I agree that the 30-foot wide strike zone we saw took our normally patient at-bats out of rhythm, but there were an awful lot of other strikes we didn't hit. Is it just possible we faced two very good pitchers and went into a hitting slump all at the same time as having the worst plate ump I've ever seen? Perhaps.
I agree again, you said; "The umpire behind the plate was terrible without a doubt and made OSU hitters uncomfortable but he isn't the reason OSU lost the game." But if you read this I'd love to know if you have any comment on WHY the NCAA and/or the CWS would put a SEC ump behind the plate in any of these games. I certainly wouldn't have wanted a PAC12 ump back there for a multitude of reasons. But I have to say, as bad as PAC12 umps (and referees) are --- this guy made our League's ump look all-world!
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 26, 2017 8:30:10 GMT -8
Post by alwaysorange on Jun 26, 2017 8:30:10 GMT -8
Casey's game is getting guys on base and moving them around. When a batter is thrown an outside pitch that should have been ball four but instead is strike 3 that is one less batter to move around the bases. I put a lot more blame on the lack of discipline of an SEC ump than I do on the discipline of OSU batters.
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 26, 2017 8:55:18 GMT -8
Post by kvgeorge on Jun 26, 2017 8:55:18 GMT -8
I agree there is no blame to be placed for what was an incredible season that came up short. That's baseball in particular and sports in general.
I would never say Pat Casey was out coached, he is far to good for that. I will say that I suspect that Coach Casey is looking long and hard in the mirror to evaluate his performance not just in the CWS but across the season. That takes guts and he does not lack for courage.
That is why he is one of the best in the business. This team and this program is too good to fade away. It is hard to get to Omaha, harder to win. Enjoy the moment, mourn to disappointment, move on cause next season will be here soon enough.
|
|
|
Post by gzrbvr on Jun 26, 2017 8:57:59 GMT -8
Let me begin by letting everyone on this board know that I'm an LSU fan who happens to live in Baton Rouge as well. I created an account here prior to the first LSU/OSU CWS game b/c I appreciated and respected the passion that OSU fans have for their baseball program. We as LSU fans have that same passion for our baseball program which has it's own tradition and great support while taking a back seat to a football program that drives all LSU Athletics. I chose this thread b/c it's subject is a common discussion the day following any teams early post season exit. I'm a big team fan of the Houston Astros and LSU baseball but I'm just a huge fan of the sport of baseball at all levels and I was even blessed to play at the DIV 1 level. I wanted to provide my thoughts on this subject and OSU's play over the last few games. I'll be very objective and impartial but I'm sure there will still be a few here who dispute that. I apologize in advance for such a long post. Umpires that official these games enforce the rule book while relying on personal judgement to make calls. They often make bad calls and games are effected as a result one way or another. We hope that the games outcome isn't directly decided by that one bad call. As fans we are emotionally involved and we are quick to "blame" (especially officiating) when some bad calls are made and our teams lose. Friday's OSU/LSU Game: Lange was dialed in through 7.1 innings and his only mistakes were in the 3rd where a mechanics issue caused him to struggle with command. We all know this is when Kwon sent the ball into the LF corner hitting the yellow foul line under the foul pole with runners on 1st & 2nd with 1 out. Pat Casey & his Asst Coach thought the ball was indeed foul and declined to ask the officials for a review. If this ball is called fair then a couple runs come across for OSU and it's potentially a different ball game. Timely hitting with RISP is vital in games like this and leaving bases full of Beavers in the 3rd really hurt OSU. Conclusion: Pat Casey's decision to decline review ended up being a big mistake since 2 runs possibly score in a game that was decided by 2 runs. OSU's lack of offensive production through the line up did nothing to off-set the foul call. Lange had a lot to do with that and finished with 8 SO's & 1 Run on 2 Hits. Saturday's OSU/LSU Game: (Just hear me out) Gilbert was great considering he's spent all season in LSU's bull pen. He went 7.1 innings allowing 1 Run on 2 Hits & just 1 Walk. Gilbert was dialed in as well and took full advantage of home plate umpires very generous zone. He's stayed down & on the black hitting Pap's mitt wherever he was calling for it which was usually down on the outside edge. Look, I totally understand why so many of you are upset about the strike zone. There were some balls that were clearly 6 inches off the plate that Gilbert would benefit from. Now, it's hard for OSU fans to accept but the umpire was calling it both ways but the wide strike zone had a larger negative impact on OSU hitters. The reason OSU hitters were getting more of these strikes off the plate called early on is b/c they left the bat on their shoulders as Gilbert took advantage of the new strike zone. OSU's patience and plate approach that they were used to wasn't going to get it done with this type of strike zone. LSU's aggressive approach at the plate was exactly what needed to be done with this new strike zone. LSU hitters were even toeing the chalk in the box throughout the game but OSU hitters stayed where they were comfortable. This is the adjustments that people are talking about OSU needing to make. Of course you can't hit a ball in the other batters box but Gilbert threw around 105 pitches and 70 were strikes. All 70 strikes were not in the other batters box where they couldn't be hit. Every pitcher wants to work ahead in the count and Gilbert is no exception, especially against a good hitting OSU team. They didn't take advantage of the early count fastball's or they were late getting around on it. LSU took advantage of early count fastballs and when they were left up in the zone they did what good hitters do and they left the yard. I agree with everyone that starting Fehmel and not Ras was the wrong decision. LSU already had a good look at Fehmel and his stuff isn't electric enough to stall a tough LSU lineup for a 2nd time. Conclusion: The umpire behind the plate was terrible without a doubt and made OSU hitters uncomfortable but he isn't the reason OSU lost the game. In a match up between 2 teams like this it's sad that the headlines are about bad umpires. Gilbert and Hess took full advantage of this umpire's terrible strike zone and OSU pitchers did not. LSU's production from the bottom half of it's lineup has been a game changer. OSU ran into 2 really good pitchers and couldn't get any production. In 18 innings against LSU the OSU offense scored 2 runs on 5 hits. Congrats on the best regular season that most of us has ever witnessed. I enjoyed watching the Beavers play and I'm now a fan of OSU. This makes too much sense. You would never make it as a duk.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jun 26, 2017 12:38:19 GMT -8
Let me begin by letting everyone on this board know that I'm an LSU fan who happens to live in Baton Rouge as well. I created an account here prior to the first LSU/OSU CWS game b/c I appreciated and respected the passion that OSU fans have for their baseball program. We as LSU fans have that same passion for our baseball program which has it's own tradition and great support while taking a back seat to a football program that drives all LSU Athletics. I chose this thread b/c it's subject is a common discussion the day following any teams early post season exit. I'm a big team fan of the Houston Astros and LSU baseball but I'm just a huge fan of the sport of baseball at all levels and I was even blessed to play at the DIV 1 level. I wanted to provide my thoughts on this subject and OSU's play over the last few games. I'll be very objective and impartial but I'm sure there will still be a few here who dispute that. I apologize in advance for such a long post. Umpires that official these games enforce the rule book while relying on personal judgement to make calls. They often make bad calls and games are effected as a result one way or another. We hope that the games outcome isn't directly decided by that one bad call. As fans we are emotionally involved and we are quick to "blame" (especially officiating) when some bad calls are made and our teams lose. Friday's OSU/LSU Game: Lange was dialed in through 7.1 innings and his only mistakes were in the 3rd where a mechanics issue caused him to struggle with command. We all know this is when Kwon sent the ball into the LF corner hitting the yellow foul line under the foul pole with runners on 1st & 2nd with 1 out. Pat Casey & his Asst Coach thought the ball was indeed foul and declined to ask the officials for a review. If this ball is called fair then a couple runs come across for OSU and it's potentially a different ball game. Timely hitting with RISP is vital in games like this and leaving bases full of Beavers in the 3rd really hurt OSU. Conclusion: Pat Casey's decision to decline review ended up being a big mistake since 2 runs possibly score in a game that was decided by 2 runs. OSU's lack of offensive production through the line up did nothing to off-set the foul call. Lange had a lot to do with that and finished with 8 SO's & 1 Run on 2 Hits. Saturday's OSU/LSU Game: (Just hear me out) Gilbert was great considering he's spent all season in LSU's bull pen. He went 7.1 innings allowing 1 Run on 2 Hits & just 1 Walk. Gilbert was dialed in as well and took full advantage of home plate umpires very generous zone. He's stayed down & on the black hitting Pap's mitt wherever he was calling for it which was usually down on the outside edge. Look, I totally understand why so many of you are upset about the strike zone. There were some balls that were clearly 6 inches off the plate that Gilbert would benefit from. Now, it's hard for OSU fans to accept but the umpire was calling it both ways but the wide strike zone had a larger negative impact on OSU hitters. The reason OSU hitters were getting more of these strikes off the plate called early on is b/c they left the bat on their shoulders as Gilbert took advantage of the new strike zone. OSU's patience and plate approach that they were used to wasn't going to get it done with this type of strike zone. LSU's aggressive approach at the plate was exactly what needed to be done with this new strike zone. LSU hitters were even toeing the chalk in the box throughout the game but OSU hitters stayed where they were comfortable. This is the adjustments that people are talking about OSU needing to make. Of course you can't hit a ball in the other batters box but Gilbert threw around 105 pitches and 70 were strikes. All 70 strikes were not in the other batters box where they couldn't be hit. Every pitcher wants to work ahead in the count and Gilbert is no exception, especially against a good hitting OSU team. They didn't take advantage of the early count fastball's or they were late getting around on it. LSU took advantage of early count fastballs and when they were left up in the zone they did what good hitters do and they left the yard. I agree with everyone that starting Fehmel and not Ras was the wrong decision. LSU already had a good look at Fehmel and his stuff isn't electric enough to stall a tough LSU lineup for a 2nd time. Conclusion: The umpire behind the plate was terrible without a doubt and made OSU hitters uncomfortable but he isn't the reason OSU lost the game. In a match up between 2 teams like this it's sad that the headlines are about bad umpires. Gilbert and Hess took full advantage of this umpire's terrible strike zone and OSU pitchers did not. LSU's production from the bottom half of it's lineup has been a game changer. OSU ran into 2 really good pitchers and couldn't get any production. In 18 innings against LSU the OSU offense scored 2 runs on 5 hits. Congrats on the best regular season that most of us has ever witnessed. I enjoyed watching the Beavers play and I'm now a fan of OSU. It was not just that it was a wide zone. It was an inconsistently wide zone. There were other balls on the outside edge of the plate (that were actually strikes!) called balls for LSU. Oregon State has played in games with terrible zones, but those are usually in midweek games. When only four teams are left, those teams deserve a better umpire than the one that Oregon State received on Saturday. Gilbert pitched well, but if there was a decent strike zone, he would not have been able to get away throwing into the other batter's box. If he brought the pitches in, the Beavers would have hammered him. At the very least, he does not get into the eighth. Anyway, LSU "won" *6-1* Disney gets a final with LSU in it, which is what they want. Yay! Everyone wins! The Friday game is on Casey. The umps should have gotten Kwan's shot right, but it was incumbent on Casey to make them get it right. No arguing. No asking. Just review it. However, Casey's failure is in a large part a product of a conference that is not committed to baseball. We all laughed at UCLA for not having video equipment at the game. Oregon State losing on Friday is a product of the conference's failure to support baseball. If the Beavers win on Friday, Oregon State does not have to contend with Street's amorphously large strike zone that varies based upon what color jersey is in the batter's box. But if the Beavers got it right on Friday, Oregon State would not have had to contend with Street on Saturday. Oregon State deserves better. It is incumbent upon each of us Oregon State fans to get this conference to care more about baseball, to make the sport a bigger deal, to make the Pac-12 the Conference of Champions once again. In the end, the Beavers are a product of the Pac-12, and the Pac-12 sucks, when it comes to baseball. We need to work with the other schools to make it better. The Pac-12 needs a conference tournament and needs to have instant replay at all conference games. Having neither kills the conference teams on the biggest stage.
|
|
|
Post by jrock311 on Jun 26, 2017 13:17:41 GMT -8
Very rationale post jrock, with just a couple items from me, for what they're worth. You said, "Conclusion: Pat Casey's decision to decline review ended up being a big mistake since 2 runs possibly score......" I contend he didn't "decline" to review the play, he just wasn't emphatic enough to ASK for a review. Seems he went out and was told in no uncertain terms by the umps that the ball was foul and he accepted that answer. He shouldn't have in real time, but he did. I've been asking how our third base coach missed the fair/foul ball, where was he and why didn't he see it. It also seems to me that in a reviewable call where the head coach goes out to question it, somebody should have requested a review be it umps, or coaches. I agree with this as well, you said: "Gilbert threw around 105 pitches and 70 were strikes. All 70 strikes were not in the other batters box where they couldn't be hit." I agree that the 30-foot wide strike zone we saw took our normally patient at-bats out of rhythm, but there were an awful lot of other strikes we didn't hit. Is it just possible we faced two very good pitchers and went into a hitting slump all at the same time as having the worst plate ump I've ever seen? Perhaps. I agree again, you said; "The umpire behind the plate was terrible without a doubt and made OSU hitters uncomfortable but he isn't the reason OSU lost the game." But if you read this I'd love to know if you have any comment on WHY the NCAA and/or the CWS would put a SEC ump behind the plate in any of these games. I certainly wouldn't have wanted a PAC12 ump back there for a multitude of reasons. But I have to say, as bad as PAC12 umps (and referees) are --- this guy made our League's ump look all-world! I'm sorry, I was just using the word "Decline" to say that Pat chose not to have the play reviewed. Also, I believe that I heard the 3rd base coach indicated to Pat that he thought the foul ball hit by Kwon was foul. I can't confirm this and it's just what I heard. If it's true then that means Pat Casey had enough faith in his asst coach to not challenge the call. I personally think that it's his duty and obligation to his kids to do everything he can to ensure the right call was made.
In the game on Saturday where the strike zone was terrible we all just have to give Gilbert credit there. He took full advantage while hitting his spots all game and he kept the ball down on the edge of the zone. The OSU hitters were mentally uncomfortable at the plate for several reasons. First, they couldn't afford to be as patient at the plate as they were used to b/c once they went with 2 strikes in the count the batters box became a death sentence. Then LSU went up by 3 early in the game with the 3 run homer from Pap. This was the turning point for me and I think the kids from OSU hit the panic button. Now, for the first time all season the kids were facing a CWS elimination, facing a tough pitcher, down by 3 runs and having to adjust their plate approach. I think with all this adversity mounting that they started pressing really hard. When the umpire is calling the game behind the plate like that it's your job as a hitter to adjust to the zone. As unfair as it seems this has to be done b/c he's not going to adjust to the hitters.
The plate umpire being from the SEC is something that I learned about from you guys. I can honestly say that I don't remember him calling any LSU games nor was there a conference game this year that an umpire was consistently that far off the plate. I don't support officials from the participating teams conferences to officiate post season games in any sport. In college football the refs are usually pulled from other conferences to officiate the games in post season. I would have surely thought that the same would apply at the CWS.
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 26, 2017 18:01:01 GMT -8
Post by jdogge on Jun 26, 2017 18:01:01 GMT -8
Let me begin by letting everyone on this board know that I'm an LSU fan who happens to live in Baton Rouge as well. I created an account here prior to the first LSU/OSU CWS game b/c I appreciated and respected the passion that OSU fans have for their baseball program. We as LSU fans have that same passion for our baseball program which has it's own tradition and great support while taking a back seat to a football program that drives all LSU Athletics. I chose this thread b/c it's subject is a common discussion the day following any teams early post season exit. I'm a big team fan of the Houston Astros and LSU baseball but I'm just a huge fan of the sport of baseball at all levels and I was even blessed to play at the DIV 1 level. I wanted to provide my thoughts on this subject and OSU's play over the last few games. I'll be very objective and impartial but I'm sure there will still be a few here who dispute that. I apologize in advance for such a long post. Umpires that official these games enforce the rule book while relying on personal judgement to make calls. They often make bad calls and games are effected as a result one way or another. We hope that the games outcome isn't directly decided by that one bad call. As fans we are emotionally involved and we are quick to "blame" (especially officiating) when some bad calls are made and our teams lose. Friday's OSU/LSU Game: Lange was dialed in through 7.1 innings and his only mistakes were in the 3rd where a mechanics issue caused him to struggle with command. We all know this is when Kwon sent the ball into the LF corner hitting the yellow foul line under the foul pole with runners on 1st & 2nd with 1 out. Pat Casey & his Asst Coach thought the ball was indeed foul and declined to ask the officials for a review. If this ball is called fair then a couple runs come across for OSU and it's potentially a different ball game. Timely hitting with RISP is vital in games like this and leaving bases full of Beavers in the 3rd really hurt OSU. Conclusion: Pat Casey's decision to decline review ended up being a big mistake since 2 runs possibly score in a game that was decided by 2 runs. OSU's lack of offensive production through the line up did nothing to off-set the foul call. Lange had a lot to do with that and finished with 8 SO's & 1 Run on 2 Hits. Saturday's OSU/LSU Game: (Just hear me out) Gilbert was great considering he's spent all season in LSU's bull pen. He went 7.1 innings allowing 1 Run on 2 Hits & just 1 Walk. Gilbert was dialed in as well and took full advantage of home plate umpires very generous zone. He's stayed down & on the black hitting Pap's mitt wherever he was calling for it which was usually down on the outside edge. Look, I totally understand why so many of you are upset about the strike zone. There were some balls that were clearly 6 inches off the plate that Gilbert would benefit from. Now, it's hard for OSU fans to accept but the umpire was calling it both ways but the wide strike zone had a larger negative impact on OSU hitters. The reason OSU hitters were getting more of these strikes off the plate called early on is b/c they left the bat on their shoulders as Gilbert took advantage of the new strike zone. OSU's patience and plate approach that they were used to wasn't going to get it done with this type of strike zone. LSU's aggressive approach at the plate was exactly what needed to be done with this new strike zone. LSU hitters were even toeing the chalk in the box throughout the game but OSU hitters stayed where they were comfortable. This is the adjustments that people are talking about OSU needing to make. Of course you can't hit a ball in the other batters box but Gilbert threw around 105 pitches and 70 were strikes. All 70 strikes were not in the other batters box where they couldn't be hit. Every pitcher wants to work ahead in the count and Gilbert is no exception, especially against a good hitting OSU team. They didn't take advantage of the early count fastball's or they were late getting around on it. LSU took advantage of early count fastballs and when they were left up in the zone they did what good hitters do and they left the yard. I agree with everyone that starting Fehmel and not Ras was the wrong decision. LSU already had a good look at Fehmel and his stuff isn't electric enough to stall a tough LSU lineup for a 2nd time. Conclusion: The umpire behind the plate was terrible without a doubt and made OSU hitters uncomfortable but he isn't the reason OSU lost the game. In a match up between 2 teams like this it's sad that the headlines are about bad umpires. Gilbert and Hess took full advantage of this umpire's terrible strike zone and OSU pitchers did not. LSU's production from the bottom half of it's lineup has been a game changer. OSU ran into 2 really good pitchers and couldn't get any production. In 18 innings against LSU the OSU offense scored 2 runs on 5 hits. Congrats on the best regular season that most of us has ever witnessed. I enjoyed watching the Beavers play and I'm now a fan of OSU. This makes too much sense. You would never make it as a duk. None of it matters. They just didn't get it done.
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 26, 2017 18:09:32 GMT -8
Post by lebaneaver on Jun 26, 2017 18:09:32 GMT -8
I simply believe there was too much emotional expenditure regarding Luke. That can certainly drain a club. Couple that with going against an outstanding LSU club, AND the expectations of "being number 1," were too many obstacles for this young team to overcome. "Blue" sucked, but we needed to adjust/adapt...and PC should have AT LEAST requested a look at the "foul ball" call in the second game against the Tigers. I'll NEVER understand why he didn't. Too, too many things went against us. I REALLY hate excuses (it's so schmuckish), but I guess I'm having a hard time letting go of this baseball team. They'll NEVER be together again. Sucks. JRock makes some great points, BTW. I'm out.
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jun 27, 2017 7:47:09 GMT -8
From what I saw, the strike zone didn't change based on what color jersey was in the box...it changed based on what box the batter was in. He wasn't giving the off-the-plate strike vs. any right handed batters. Yes, it affected us more, because they had a strikeout starter and we didn't. Gilbert rung up 43 in 44.2 IP this year. Fehmel rung up 49 in 81.1. Of the 14 batters who struck out on Saturday (for both sides), only two of those (Grenier and Slaughter) were batting right handed. Deichmann struck out twice. I think the umps strike zone was consistently awful, and LSU did a better job of hitting his "sweet spot" than we did. Once Fehmel came out, they got two runs on four hits in 5.2 innings and struck out four times. Over our final 5.2 innings at the plate, we got one run on three hits and struck out four times. Biggest difference in the game was the starting pitching - they hit the spot, and we didn't. No bias, nothing unfair about it.
|
|
|
Post by ochobeavo on Jun 27, 2017 8:43:51 GMT -8
From what I saw, the strike zone didn't change based on what color jersey was in the box...it changed based on what box the batter was in. He wasn't giving the off-the-plate strike vs. any right handed batters. Yes, it affected us more, because they had a strikeout starter and we didn't. Gilbert rung up 43 in 44.2 IP this year. Fehmel rung up 49 in 81.1. Of the 14 batters who struck out on Saturday (for both sides), only two of those (Grenier and Slaughter) were batting right handed. Deichmann struck out twice. I think the umps strike zone was consistently awful, and LSU did a better job of hitting his "sweet spot" than we did. Once Fehmel came out, they got two runs on four hits in 5.2 innings and struck out four times. Over our final 5.2 innings at the plate, we got one run on three hits and struck out four times. Biggest difference in the game was the starting pitching - they hit the spot, and we didn't. No bias, nothing unfair about it. Agreed 100%. Their kid painted that spot all day and took advantage. When Bryce missed he missed by a ton. In fact I think he even overcompensated trying to hit that outside "corner" a few times with his fastball and ended up 2 feet outside. If we had Luke pitching that day, he's the type of guy with enough command to hit that spot all day too. And that's not meant to be a "what if" or woe is me re: Luke...
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 27, 2017 12:33:45 GMT -8
Post by mbabeav on Jun 27, 2017 12:33:45 GMT -8
From what I saw, the strike zone didn't change based on what color jersey was in the box...it changed based on what box the batter was in. He wasn't giving the off-the-plate strike vs. any right handed batters. Yes, it affected us more, because they had a strikeout starter and we didn't. Gilbert rung up 43 in 44.2 IP this year. Fehmel rung up 49 in 81.1. Of the 14 batters who struck out on Saturday (for both sides), only two of those (Grenier and Slaughter) were batting right handed. Deichmann struck out twice. I think the umps strike zone was consistently awful, and LSU did a better job of hitting his "sweet spot" than we did. Once Fehmel came out, they got two runs on four hits in 5.2 innings and struck out four times. Over our final 5.2 innings at the plate, we got one run on three hits and struck out four times. Biggest difference in the game was the starting pitching - they hit the spot, and we didn't. No bias, nothing unfair about it. Agreed 100%. Their kid painted that spot all day and took advantage. When Bryce missed he missed by a ton. In fact I think he even overcompensated trying to hit that outside "corner" a few times with his fastball and ended up 2 feet outside. If we had Luke pitching that day, he's the type of guy with enough command to hit that spot all day too. And that's not meant to be a "what if" or woe is me re: Luke... Razz could have matched that LSU pitcher fastball for fastball; Bryce's curve and changeup were not going to get the benefit of the ump not being able to see a 90+ mph fastball, and having to look at where the LSU catcher had moved his glove a second after the ball was caught
|
|
|
Blame
Jun 27, 2017 14:40:09 GMT -8
Post by beaverintheberg on Jun 27, 2017 14:40:09 GMT -8
I think what we all don't know, unlike Yeskie, is where Rassmussen is physically. I suspect we will find out later why he wasn't called on more.
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Jun 27, 2017 14:42:51 GMT -8
I think what we all don't know, unlike Yeskie, is where Rassmussen is physically. I suspect we will find out later why he wasn't called on more. Don't know if there was an issue - he did end up throwing more innings that Bryce the last game, and had a few extra mph on his fastball than the LSU kid. He seemed pretty sound, and I wish him the best on his pro career, and thank him for all his work and leadership, and that perfect game
|
|