|
Post by ostate on Apr 18, 2017 17:53:46 GMT -8
|
|
beaver94
Sophomore
Posts: 1,632
Member is Online
|
Post by beaver94 on Apr 18, 2017 18:27:11 GMT -8
I quit watching most things ESPN 5 or 10 years ago. The only program,I got they put out that's really of interest to me anymore besides some games are some of the 30 for 30 shows. I find most of their 'personalities' pretty annoying.
One of their few redeeming things that I enjoy is their online streaming of games. They give the option to start a game from the start any time after it starts. I don't have to be tied to a certain start time and the replay is available for at least a couple days after the event.
|
|
|
Post by ostate on Apr 18, 2017 18:56:40 GMT -8
I quit watching most things ESPN 5 or 10 years ago. The only program,I got they put out that's really of interest to me anymore besides some games are some of the 30 for 30 shows. I find most of their 'personalities' pretty annoying. One of their few redeeming things that I enjoy is their online streaming of games. They give the option to start a game from the start any time after it starts. I don't have to be tied to a certain start time and the replay is available for at least a couple days after the event. Some of those 30 for 30 productions are great - I recently watched one on the Spirits of St. Louis of the ABA... But, right now on ESPN is a show called 'We the Fans: Soldier Field'; it's description:"Chronicling the lives of Chicago Bears fans in 2016, at Soldier Field and away from the games"... worthless...
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Apr 19, 2017 8:36:04 GMT -8
ESPN became SEC honks back in the mid 80's, because SEC schools had the fan base to justify putting things like SEC baseball, heck, anything SEC on the network and they would earn enough to keep the network solvent. At that time, few conferences had the vision that the SEC had - Pac-12 was about the last of the power 5 to recognize the value of their product and well, that is the fault of our administrators, not the SEC.
|
|