|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Mar 20, 2017 16:24:26 GMT -8
..I'll admit, I'm a real a$$hole when it comes to ANYTHING u of hole...I despise them, and their condescending attitudes....I'm also NOT a "Pac12 friend," so to speak....That said, I'm not at all happy to see the schmuck ladies beating number 2 seed Duke. I don't want them to have ANY momentum...EVER. EVER.
|
|
|
|
Post by gnawitall on Mar 20, 2017 16:40:55 GMT -8
I don't know if you are talking about this tournament or anything but even so the great thing about Rueck and Casey is that they built solid programs without a lot of bells and whistles. Almost everything tsdtr does is with bells and whistles and millennial's love 'em. Unfortunately we are going to have to live with it for some time to come. |
|
|
|
Post by jdogge on Mar 20, 2017 17:05:30 GMT -8
..I'll admit, I'm a real a$$hole when it comes to ANYTHING u of hole...I despise them, and their condescending attitudes....I'm also NOT a "Pac12 friend," so to speak....That said, I'm not at all happy to see the schmuck ladies beating number 2 seed Duke. I don't want them to have ANY momentum...EVER. EVER. Sorry, but I disagree. The Pac-12 is now looking at five women's teams in the Sweet 16 -- OSU, Stanford, Oregon are already there; Washington and UCLA are likely. Cal would be nice, but I don't see them beating Baylor. Five teams in the Sweet 16. THAT will drive recruiting for a couple of years. |
|
|
|
Post by freddiekruger on Mar 20, 2017 17:37:10 GMT -8
..I'll admit, I'm a real a$$hole when it comes to ANYTHING u of hole...I despise them, and their condescending attitudes....I'm also NOT a "Pac12 friend," so to speak....That said, I'm not at all happy to see the schmuck ladies beating number 2 seed Duke. I don't want them to have ANY momentum...EVER. EVER. Sorry, but I disagree. The Pac-12 is now looking at five women's teams in the Sweet 16 -- OSU, Stanford, Oregon are already there; Washington and UCLA are likely. Cal would be nice, but I don't see them beating Baylor. Five teams in the Sweet 16. THAT will drive recruiting for a couple of years. The Pac-12 as a whole is battle tested. That is the difference that the other conferences do not have. Beating an undefeated at home two seed Duke at Duke is a result of playing in the Pac-12 week in and week out. |
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Mar 20, 2017 17:48:35 GMT -8
Sorry. My loathing of schmuckville supersedes ANY potential/questionable recruiting advantage for OSU. hole doesn't NEED any more advantages.
|
|
|
|
Post by orangeblood on Mar 20, 2017 17:53:22 GMT -8
ABSOLUTELY!
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Mar 20, 2017 17:57:18 GMT -8
Sorry, but I disagree. The Pac-12 is now looking at five women's teams in the Sweet 16 -- OSU, Stanford, Oregon are already there; Washington and UCLA are likely. Cal would be nice, but I don't see them beating Baylor. Five teams in the Sweet 16. THAT will drive recruiting for a couple of years. The Pac-12 as a whole is battle tested. That is the difference that the other conferences do not have. Beating an undefeated at home two seed Duke at Duke is a result of playing in the Pac-12 week in and week out. Agreed... Pac12 >> ACC (women and men)... use Duke loss to think it bodes better for us. The ACC must not be all that?! Hence, FSU is very much a winnable game IF our offense comes around. I just don't see us winning a game like this in the 50's. In the tourney (women or men's) one dimensional teams don't go very deep. We seem to be playing tight... especially Marie last game. FSU has the athletic guards to give our perimeter play trouble unless we get early inside production and Marie hits the 15' when open. Records, conference affiliation, past tourney games don't matter. Every one is 1 and done and the book on us is pretty straight forward... make anyone else beat you besides Syd. So it's time for Katie Mc, Tutor, et al to contribute bigger plays. And to dominate inside and force FSU to drop and help. Go Beavs... |
|
|
|
Post by freddiekruger on Mar 20, 2017 18:33:54 GMT -8
The Pac-12 as a whole is battle tested. That is the difference that the other conferences do not have. Beating an undefeated at home two seed Duke at Duke is a result of playing in the Pac-12 week in and week out. Agreed... Pac12 >> ACC (women and men)... use Duke loss to think it bodes better for us. The ACC must not be all that?! Hence, FSU is very much a winnable game IF our offense comes around. I just don't see us winning a game like this in the 50's. In the tourney (women or men's) one dimensional teams don't go very deep. We seem to be playing tight... especially Marie last game. FSU has the athletic guards to give our perimeter play trouble unless we get early inside production and Marie hits the 15' when open. Records, conference affiliation, past tourney games don't matter. Every one is 1 and done and the book on us is pretty straight forward... make anyone else beat you besides Syd. So it's time for Katie Mc, Tutor, et al to contribute bigger plays. And to dominate inside and force FSU to drop and help. Go Beavs... hell yes, FSU is beatable. Has to be a complete team effort to do it. |
|
|
|
Post by gnawitall on Mar 20, 2017 18:46:41 GMT -8
Aren't Duke and FSU in the same conference? Duke was a 2 and FSU a 3 and Duke lost by 10 so I would think they're beatable.
|
|
|
|
Post by gnawitall on Mar 20, 2017 19:47:03 GMT -8
ouch....they must have had some bumps in the road to end up a 3. |
|
|
|
Post by rollotomasi on Mar 21, 2017 10:06:50 GMT -8
..I'll admit, I'm a real a$$hole when it comes to ANYTHING u of hole...I despise them, and their condescending attitudes....I'm also NOT a "Pac12 friend," so to speak....That said, I'm not at all happy to see the schmuck ladies beating number 2 seed Duke. I don't want them to have ANY momentum...EVER. EVER. Bunch of skanks... Eff 'em. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 25, 2017 9:31:56 GMT -8
Barring a total and complete collapse in the 4th the $uck$ have this in the bag. Ugh. 59-47 at the end of 3 and Maryland is completely out of sorts still. Only chipped away at the lead at the very beginning of the 3rd (and only very momentarily). Final: $ucks 77 Overrated Terps 63 PAC-12 underrated. ACC overrated. |
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Mar 25, 2017 10:49:34 GMT -8
Maryland coach was bitching and moaning about their seeding......
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Mar 25, 2017 10:53:35 GMT -8
Maryland coach was bitching and moaning about their seeding...... Well, looks like the coach was right... should've been like a 7 or 8 seed! 😊 |
|
|
|
Post by gnawitall on Mar 25, 2017 11:07:15 GMT -8
I wonder if Campbell went to Pew of O cuz he knew that what we worked so hard for over six years could be done overnight there? What a putz. He fits right in though.
|
|
