|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 4, 2017 20:28:10 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Dagger
Mar 4, 2017 20:34:40 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by baseba1111 on Mar 4, 2017 20:34:40 GMT -8
If you wonder that the issues with the MBB team is all about talent... watch the video. No one in that picture is as athletic... big, strong, fast>ok... Canada is... as any of our men. Yet have you ever seen ANY of them set a solid pick while AT THE SAME TIME someone use it properly?  ? It aint all talent level in that program. |
|
|
|
Dagger
Mar 4, 2017 21:04:20 GMT -8
Post by beaverstever on Mar 4, 2017 21:04:20 GMT -8
Agree, although that pick set-up and pick set was a combination of a) very well coached players, b) players understanding how to be both patient and intelligent enough to react to the defense on the fly. It was actually really well defended - the problem for UCLA was, that was an indefensible set-up and pick for a 3-point shooter.
That's a picture-perfect as you'll see that play run at any level - the bar is really high in that highlight.
|
|
|
|
Dagger
Mar 4, 2017 21:14:57 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by baseba1111 on Mar 4, 2017 21:14:57 GMT -8
Agree, although that pick set-up and pick set was a combination of a) very well coached players, b) players understanding how to be both patient and intelligent enough to react to the defense on the fly. It was actually really well defended - the problem for UCLA was, that was an indefensible set-up and pick for a 3-point shooter. That's a picture-perfect as you'll see that play run at any level - the bar is really high in that highlight. My point... "by very well coached players". Fainting a ball screen and then setting it opposite, and a shooter reading the hedge retreating should not be a high water mark for D1 players... of either sex. |
|
|
|
Dagger
Mar 4, 2017 21:53:40 GMT -8
Post by beaverstever on Mar 4, 2017 21:53:40 GMT -8
Agree, although that pick set-up and pick set was a combination of a) very well coached players, b) players understanding how to be both patient and intelligent enough to react to the defense on the fly. It was actually really well defended - the problem for UCLA was, that was an indefensible set-up and pick for a 3-point shooter. That's a picture-perfect as you'll see that play run at any level - the bar is really high in that highlight. My point... "by very well coached players". Fainting a ball screen and then setting it opposite, and a shooter reading the hedge retreating should not be a high water mark for D1 players... of either sex. While I agree executing that sequence, the timing of it is extremely difficult to do (and may have partially been just how it worked out). That included a) Wiese faking to the left long enough to get both players moving and long enough for Guilich to get into postion to seal the high defender and the low defend to over-commit, b) Wiese not moving back to the right until Gulich sealed the high defend and get into a position where she's not moving while perfectly in place relative to the defender. Even at the NBA level, this screener in this scenario is moving most of the time (even though it's usually not called). |
|
|
|
Dagger
Mar 5, 2017 9:32:39 GMT -8
Post by Werebeaver on Mar 5, 2017 9:32:39 GMT -8
My point... "by very well coached players". Fainting a ball screen and then setting it opposite, and a shooter reading the hedge retreating should not be a high water mark for D1 players... of either sex. While I agree executing that sequence, the timing of it is extremely difficult to do (and may have partially been just how it worked out). That included a) Wiese faking to the left long enough to get both players moving and long enough for Guilich to get into postion to seal the high defender and the low defend to over-commit, b) Wiese not moving back to the right until Gulich sealed the high defend and get into a position where she's not moving while perfectly in place relative to the defender. Even at the NBA level, this screener in this scenario is moving most of the time (even though it's usually not called). Thanks for the analysis guys. Looking at it again (and again) Marie's screen is every bit as amazing as the Syd's shot. Put them together and it's impossible to defend. |
|
?