|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jan 21, 2017 8:41:20 GMT -8
Utah's Emily Potter had no chance against Marie/Bre/Kolbie. |
|
|
|
Post by bennyskid on Jan 21, 2017 10:35:19 GMT -8
It is definitely more versatile, both offensively and defensively. Last year every opponent knew how to play Ruth. Not many could really execute it, but there was a specific recipe: on offense, pop in shots from the "hole" around the foul line to draw Ruthie out of the basket area; on defense, front her, and put a body behind her to prevent the lob. There's no one recipe, on O or D, to handle all the schemes that are possible with Marie, Bre, and Kolbie.
SR has to be having a ball. I imagine he giggles in his sleep as he dreams up new schemes for these girls.
|
|
|
|
Post by coforange on Jan 21, 2017 10:39:21 GMT -8
Not that I might not have done the same with the Canadian Hammer, but with her gone it has sure opens a whole new show case of talent. I believe we may be a bit stronger defensively.
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 21, 2017 12:45:39 GMT -8
We're deeper, experienced, and a lot more athletic/versatile.
Plus... well coached!
|
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Jan 21, 2017 16:03:37 GMT -8
Yep. More athletic I think, too.
|
|
