|
|
Post by beavdowg on Jan 16, 2017 13:37:16 GMT -8
The day of the biggest Pac-12 women's hoop game of the year, OSU vs Stanford, and there was NOTHING in the paper regarding the game. For several weeks now I can't find any women's Top 25 rankings. They might refer to it in a small blurb about the rankings but then the top 25 isn't in the back of the sports page next to the men like it always used to be. AND, today I think it was, they said that UW was "at the top of the Pac-12 rankings". BS!! OSU is still at the top of the Pac-12 rankings AND they beat UW. Bugs me!! Cover it and get it right!!
Go Beavs!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jan 16, 2017 15:32:13 GMT -8
The day of the biggest Pac-12 women's hoop game of the year, OSU vs Stanford, and there was NOTHING in the paper regarding the game. For several weeks now I can't find any women's Top 25 rankings. They might refer to it in a small blurb about the rankings but then the top 25 isn't in the back of the sports page next to the men like it always used to be. AND, today I think it was, they said that UW was "at the top of the Pac-12 rankings". BS!! OSU is still at the top of the Pac-12 rankings AND they beat UW. Bugs me!! Cover it and get it right!! Go Beavs!!! I don't disagree with you about the lack of WBB coverage in Oregonian.
But strictly speaking, UW at 6-1 is 1/2 game ahead of OSU at 5-1 in the Pac-12 standings, despite OSU's head-to-head victory.
pac-12.com/womens-basketball/standings
|
|
|
|
Post by treasurevalleybeav on Jan 16, 2017 16:48:38 GMT -8
Those jerkoffs are only interested in which hole football recruit is now talking to them again.
|
|
|
|
Post by oandb on Jan 16, 2017 20:00:15 GMT -8
The Oregonian's sports coverage in General is awful.
|
|
|
|
Post by beavdowg on Jan 17, 2017 6:18:55 GMT -8
Here's an example. This morning, the first morning the new polls come out for the week there's a men's top 25 listed in the back of the sports page but no women's poll.
|
|
