|
|
Post by zebraworks on Nov 26, 2016 16:59:27 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping
|
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Nov 26, 2016 17:16:50 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping All we need is to keep this group healthy. We need to find some linebackers and we need another stud corner like DeCoud. |
|
|
|
Post by sweethomebeav on Nov 26, 2016 17:37:55 GMT -8
Offensive line looks to be strong next year. LT-Brandel, LG-Lavaka, C-Kearsley, RG-Lauina, RT-Sattlemeir
Solid reserves in Hopkins, Delp, Moore, Demogerontas, Fifita. One more JC OL would add the final piece to the puzzle.
Add Noah Togai back as a multipupose player and a year under Wily-Matagi's belt and we are much stronger blocking the run. Hope the JC quarterback is the real deal and step into that position. Upgrade the receiving corp and the future looks very bright!
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 26, 2016 23:18:21 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping 7th place in the Pac-12. We beat California. (Although the Bears went 2-1 in nonconference to finish with a better overall record.) It should be noted that, at 5-7, California is in line for a bowl berth if the final three teams looking to become bowl eligible choke or if the Texases of the world decline bowl invites in front of California. |
|
|
|
Post by zebraworks on Nov 26, 2016 23:35:47 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping 7th place in the Pac-12. We beat California. (Although the Bears went 2-1 in nonconference to finish with a better overall record.) It should be noted that, at 5-7, California is in line for a bowl berth if the final three teams looking to become bowl eligible choke or if the Texases of the world decline bowl invites in front of California. why is Cal listed ahead of us in conference standings? I know overall they have a better record but I would have thought that as far as the official PAC12 conference standing we would be listed ahead of them since we beat them head to head with the same conference record? Cal is listed ahead of the beavs |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 26, 2016 23:59:13 GMT -8
7th place in the Pac-12. We beat California. (Although the Bears went 2-1 in nonconference to finish with a better overall record.) It should be noted that, at 5-7, California is in line for a bowl berth if the final three teams looking to become bowl eligible choke or if the Texases of the world decline bowl invites in front of California. why is Cal listed ahead of us in conference standings? I know overall they have a better record but I would have thought that as far as the official PAC12 conference standing we would be listed ahead of them since we beat them head to head with the same conference record? Cal is listed ahead of the beavs It could just be alphabetical? It could be that California has a chance to go to a bowl, and Oregon State does not. The Beavers should be listed above the Bears, though, with the head-to-head win. In other news, Hawai'i won to clinch a bowl game. Absent something strange, the Bears are going to need Louisiana Lafayette and South Alabama to lose and at least one team in front of them to decline an invite (probably Texas) to go bowling. |
|
|
|
Post by beavsaregood on Nov 27, 2016 0:44:01 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping Just get 6 wins, somehow. I'll be happy. Achieving more than 6 Ws would be gravy. |
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Nov 27, 2016 8:17:48 GMT -8
If we get some OL maybe we will be top 5 Pac team next year? here's hoping Just get 6 wins, somehow. I'll be happy. Achieving more than 6 Ws would be gravy. Our OOC schedule should be 3 wins next year, with the big one being Minny at Reser. I think OS wins 4 conference games next year. Unfortunately we don't get Arizona and UCLA again, but ASU looks like a train wreck and starting to quit on redass Graham. USC will be a nightmare. No matter who we play Reser is going to be a tough out for road teams. |
|
|
|
Post by orangeblood on Nov 27, 2016 8:28:06 GMT -8
Conference rotation 2017
Actually we do get Arizona again plus ASU, Colorado and USC
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Nov 27, 2016 9:23:55 GMT -8
Just get 6 wins, somehow. I'll be happy. Achieving more than 6 Ws would be gravy. Our OOC schedule should be 3 wins next year, with the big one being Minny at Reser. I think OS wins 4 conference games next year. Unfortunately we don't get Arizona and UCLA again, but ASU looks like a train wreck and starting to quit on redass Graham. USC will be a nightmare. No matter who we play Reser is going to be a tough out for road teams. If we get a full 25 schollies in school and on the field to create some depth I could see a 6 win team as a bottom of expectations... at least 2-1/4-5. Some will depend on how schedule comes out, and when the bye week is. But, that needs to be the next step... no excuses. |
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Nov 27, 2016 10:33:38 GMT -8
Conference rotation 2017 Actually we do get Arizona again plus ASU, Colorado and USC Thx I thought we always played Utah AND CU and swapped between the SoCal and AZ schools. I'd like another shot at Utah, Oregon State would beat that team I watched yesterday. They look pathetic right now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2016 12:20:14 GMT -8
Offensive line looks to be strong next year. LT-Brandel, LG-Lavaka, C-Kearsley, RG-Lauina, RT-Sattlemeir Solid reserves in Hopkins, Delp, Moore, Demogerontas, Fifita. One more JC OL would add the final piece to the puzzle. Add Noah Togai back as a multipupose player and a year under Wily-Matagi's belt and we are much stronger blocking the run. Hope the JC quarterback is the real deal and step into that position. Upgrade the receiving corp and the future looks very bright!
And really hate losing a center because of having to start over with the snaps and counts etc.
But the positive factor, again, is the Beavs now have coaches who accept nothing less than constant effort and hard-nose toughness. I believe this program now has hard coded the mentality and habits to rebuild the O-line unit without it dragging out into a season long issue next year. |
|
|
|
Post by ag87 on Nov 27, 2016 12:41:42 GMT -8
Conference rotation 2017 Actually we do get Arizona again plus ASU, Colorado and USC Thx I thought we always played Utah AND CU and swapped between the SoCal and AZ schools. I'd like another shot at Utah, Oregon State would beat that team I watched yesterday. They look pathetic right now. We play either USC or UCLA every year. We play three of the following four: Utah, Colorado, ASU, and Arizona. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 28, 2016 12:14:18 GMT -8
Offensive line looks to be strong next year. LT-Brandel, LG-Lavaka, C-Kearsley, RG-Lauina, RT-Sattlemeir Solid reserves in Hopkins, Delp, Moore, Demogerontas, Fifita. One more JC OL would add the final piece to the puzzle. Add Noah Togai back as a multipupose player and a year under Wily-Matagi's belt and we are much stronger blocking the run. Hope the JC quarterback is the real deal and step into that position. Upgrade the receiving corp and the future looks very bright!
And really hate losing a center because of having to start over with the snaps and counts etc.
But the positive factor, again, is the Beavs now have coaches who accept nothing less than constant effort and hard-nose toughness. I believe this program now has hard coded the mentality and habits to rebuild the O-line unit without it dragging out into a season long issue next year. People are really looking at Stanton? Good for him! Tight end that transitioned to an offensive lineman in 2013, because of the stupid number of injuries on the line. Transitioned back to tight end in 2014 before transitioning back to lineman for good. Moved around the line while he was here, too. Andrews also moved around a lot, too. Played every position besides left guard. In fact, it was really Andrews' mono that forced the staff to move Stanton to the line in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on Nov 28, 2016 14:18:10 GMT -8
why is Cal listed ahead of us in conference standings? I know overall they have a better record but I would have thought that as far as the official PAC12 conference standing we would be listed ahead of them since we beat them head to head with the same conference record? Cal is listed ahead of the beavs It could just be alphabetical? It could be that California has a chance to go to a bowl, and Oregon State does not. The Beavers should be listed above the Bears, though, with the head-to-head win. In other news, Hawai'i won to clinch a bowl game. Absent something strange, the Bears are going to need Louisiana Lafayette and South Alabama to lose and at least one team in front of them to decline an invite (probably Texas) to go bowling. I don't believe the Conference applies tie-breakers to teams for any reason other than determining the Champion of the Division. If you finish tied with another team at 3-6, you are simply tied for 7th place. Remember in 2000, we were simply Pac-10 co-champions, not 2nd place. We can apply all the tie-breakers we want, in whatever order we want, but the Conference doesn't necessarily do it that way. |
|
