|
Post by 86BEAVER on Nov 20, 2016 19:16:23 GMT -8
...is Steve Thompson that important?
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever71 on Nov 20, 2016 19:28:49 GMT -8
I think thompson is important.. but i think they are missing senior leaders like they had last season in GPII, LMW, Gomis
|
|
|
Post by Tigardbeav on Nov 20, 2016 20:38:26 GMT -8
yes
|
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,729
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on Nov 20, 2016 21:45:40 GMT -8
I believe our team speed took a hit with GP II's departure. And especially with Derek Bruce's unexpected departure - he was poised to really take a step forward this season. Stephen Thompson being out hurts, because he is someone who can consistently hurt you from the outside. With him out teams can more easily clog the paint and make it slower going for Tres and Drew (and others) to operate.
I believe our ball handling took a hit with Duvivier's (and Bruce's) unexpected departure. Our new guards may be competent, but they aren't yet the speedster, scorer or slasher type that we lost. Did I mention ball handling? I think we will really see this when we hit conference play and we are plagued by proto-NBA caliber guards.
Lastly, I contend GPII did share a trait with his father - the ability to make the rest of the team better by his mere presence. We need new (vocal) leadership to emerge. I suspect Gomis helped with his effort and demeanor in that regard as well.
What I can't decide (and why I will continue to tune into the games when I can) is whether these are issues of a team in transition - one that will find existing players to plug those holes created by graduation and unexpected departures, or whether these are fundamental talent gaps that only recruiting can resolve. And at how successful Coach Tinkle is at devising a system that plays to his team's strengths and somehow hides these deficiencies.
(That said, I fear for the fact that walk-ons have played such a large role in this team thus far. I hope Coach Tinkle is sending some sort of effort/PT sort of message to scholarship players, or awaiting Kone/Dew emerging and riding out the injuries, but fear for the alternative explanations :-).
Lucky for me, I started following the Beavers in 1987. I was quickly disabused of the notion that we were a perennial March Madness team starting in the early 90s :-).
Go Beavs!
|
|
hof99
Freshman
Posts: 182
|
Post by hof99 on Nov 21, 2016 7:06:26 GMT -8
I think that the old saying ' defense feeds the offense' ( or something like that), is our issue. Some of these new guys never had to play legitimate defense, now It's absolutely necessary- especially based on CoachTinkles game. The Lamar game was a clear indicator of that because we could not execute on the defensive end - including rebounding, even though we are much bigger, than the other teams who end up with more quality possessions. Our guys just get worn down. If the other team is also hitting 3 balls, we really get rattled. I think we need to ( unfortunately ), slow things up so that the kids can get more comfortable with the new roles they have to play. Until this comes together, we are going to have to stay in a pretty tight zone and defend the opposing guards a lot tighter - give them less space to be successful. I agree that Payton was the real difference maker, that we do not have this year. That is a real position of need.
|
|
|
Post by ochobeavo on Nov 21, 2016 8:25:24 GMT -8
I think that the old saying ' defense feeds the offense' ( or something like that), is our issue. Some of these new guys never had to play legitimate defense, now It's absolutely necessary- especially based on CoachTinkles game. The Lamar game was a clear indicator of that because we could not execute on the defensive end - including rebounding, even though we are much bigger, than the other teams who end up with more quality possessions. Our guys just get worn down. If the other team is also hitting 3 balls, we really get rattled. I think we need to ( unfortunately ), slow things up so that the kids can get more comfortable with the new roles they have to play. Until this comes together, we are going to have to stay in a pretty tight zone and defend the opposing guards a lot tighter - give them less space to be successful. I agree that Payton was the real difference maker, that we do not have this year. That is a real position of need. I don't know if I'd point to defense as the culprit in the Lamar game. We held them to 28% FG and outrebounded them by 13. TOs led to us taking about 25 fewer shots than they did. Hard to score if you can't complete a pass or hang on to the ball long enough to actually shoot it. We're lucky it was "just Lamar" and they were awful or else we would have lost by 40 (as we basically saw a couple nights later when it was a much better opponent). However, I think you're absolutely on to something with defense. IMO, I think our perimeter defense has taken a huge hit with GP and Malcolm gone. And that's going to put tremendous pressure on Drew/N'Diaye/G to provide help all year long - especially once we start P12 play where everyone has a couple guards/wings who can penetrate and get to the hoop.
|
|
rafer
Sophomore
Posts: 1,568
|
Post by rafer on Nov 21, 2016 11:50:36 GMT -8
In a word, YES, we are not very good right now, it can change, but it's gonna be a rough ride for awhile IMO. Our weaknesses were exposed for all to see, and they will all take advantage of it. Tres is a good player and important to the success of this team, but he too often forces the ball inside when there is nothing there, take what's given to you and pull up or dish it back out, his headlong out of control dives to the hoop will not be rewarded in the PAC12. Might be a tough year and we all got a little spoiled last year exceeding expectations. We are probably/likely two years from the dance again, one would be exceeding reality probably, patience grasshopper!! They'll get better as the year progresses.
|
|
hof99
Freshman
Posts: 182
|
Post by hof99 on Nov 21, 2016 13:08:39 GMT -8
Agree with both observations. I forgot about the 28%, guess I fogged over when we couldn't Even get a shot off and they seemed to have wide open 3's , put backs and successful drives into the lane. I, like every other Beaver fan, expect this to get better - but don't be looking for another Gary Payton or for Stevie's return. We have what we have, and it's gotta get better. Go Beavs !
|
|
|
Post by beavadelic on Nov 21, 2016 19:10:49 GMT -8
I believe our team speed took a hit with GP II's departure. And especially with Derek Bruce's unexpected departure - he was poised to really take a step forward this season. Stephen Thompson being out hurts, because he is someone who can consistently hurt you from the outside. With him out teams can more easily clog the paint and make it slower going for Tres and Drew (and others) to operate. I believe our ball handling took a hit with Duvivier's (and Bruce's) unexpected departure. Our new guards may be competent, but they aren't yet the speedster, scorer or slasher type that we lost. Did I mention ball handling? I think we will really see this when we hit conference play and we are plagued by proto-NBA caliber guards. Lastly, I contend GPII did share a trait with his father - the ability to make the rest of the team better by his mere presence. We need new (vocal) leadership to emerge. I suspect Gomis helped with his effort and demeanor in that regard as well. What I can't decide (and why I will continue to tune into the games when I can) is whether these are issues of a team in transition - one that will find existing players to plug those holes created by graduation and unexpected departures, or whether these are fundamental talent gaps that only recruiting can resolve. And at how successful Coach Tinkle is at devising a system that plays to his team's strengths and somehow hides these deficiencies. (That said, I fear for the fact that walk-ons have played such a large role in this team thus far. I hope Coach Tinkle is sending some sort of effort/PT sort of message to scholarship players, or awaiting Kone/Dew emerging and riding out the injuries, but fear for the alternative explanations :-). Lucky for me, I started following the Beavers in 1987. I was quickly disabused of the notion that we were a perennial March Madness team starting in the early 90s :-). Go Beavs! Not trying to refute the general message, but I have to say that the last thing we miss from Duvivier is his ball-handling! He was a turnover machine when he took over primary ball-handling responsibilities. Just made me nervous every time he experienced pressure - even when he didn't. Malcolm played hard on D, and was a good teammate, but the ball-handler that we miss most that should have returned (other than Stevie) is Bruce. That kid was really coming on offensively, and his quickness and handles were a major asset against pressure. I never heard what truly happened with Bruce, but it really sucks that he's gone. We would be a vastly different (and better) team right now just having him to attack, threaten teams from the arc, and give us some confidence and energy out there!
|
|
|
Post by beavadelic on Nov 21, 2016 19:17:03 GMT -8
I get a little nervous that Tres' health may not hold up, especially with Stevie out. There is a danger of him trying to do too much in the absence of any other remotely refined offensive threat. With his history of lower-body injuries and reckless abandon he likes to play with in general, I could see him pushing himself too far in the face of a potential 10 win season. I'm not prognosticating that we will only win 10, but some guys had better find their mojo soon, and we desperately need a healthy Stevie Thompson out there.
|
|
|
Post by jdogge on Nov 21, 2016 21:05:33 GMT -8
I believe our team speed took a hit with GP II's departure. And especially with Derek Bruce's unexpected departure - he was poised to really take a step forward this season. Stephen Thompson being out hurts, because he is someone who can consistently hurt you from the outside. With him out teams can more easily clog the paint and make it slower going for Tres and Drew (and others) to operate. I believe our ball handling took a hit with Duvivier's (and Bruce's) unexpected departure. Our new guards may be competent, but they aren't yet the speedster, scorer or slasher type that we lost. Did I mention ball handling? I think we will really see this when we hit conference play and we are plagued by proto-NBA caliber guards. Lastly, I contend GPII did share a trait with his father - the ability to make the rest of the team better by his mere presence. We need new (vocal) leadership to emerge. I suspect Gomis helped with his effort and demeanor in that regard as well. What I can't decide (and why I will continue to tune into the games when I can) is whether these are issues of a team in transition - one that will find existing players to plug those holes created by graduation and unexpected departures, or whether these are fundamental talent gaps that only recruiting can resolve. And at how successful Coach Tinkle is at devising a system that plays to his team's strengths and somehow hides these deficiencies. (That said, I fear for the fact that walk-ons have played such a large role in this team thus far. I hope Coach Tinkle is sending some sort of effort/PT sort of message to scholarship players, or awaiting Kone/Dew emerging and riding out the injuries, but fear for the alternative explanations :-). Lucky for me, I started following the Beavers in 1987. I was quickly disabused of the notion that we were a perennial March Madness team starting in the early 90s :-). Go Beavs! Funny. I could have sworn that last year, a great number of the posters on this board couldn't wait for LMW and Duviv to leave. I think yall need to relax. Come the beginning of Pac-12 play, McLaughlin has everybody saying GPII who?
|
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,729
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on Nov 22, 2016 8:26:17 GMT -8
I believe our team speed took a hit with GP II's departure. And especially with Derek Bruce's unexpected departure - he was poised to really take a step forward this season. Stephen Thompson being out hurts, because he is someone who can consistently hurt you from the outside. With him out teams can more easily clog the paint and make it slower going for Tres and Drew (and others) to operate. I believe our ball handling took a hit with Duvivier's (and Bruce's) unexpected departure. Our new guards may be competent, but they aren't yet the speedster, scorer or slasher type that we lost. Did I mention ball handling? I think we will really see this when we hit conference play and we are plagued by proto-NBA caliber guards. Lastly, I contend GPII did share a trait with his father - the ability to make the rest of the team better by his mere presence. We need new (vocal) leadership to emerge. I suspect Gomis helped with his effort and demeanor in that regard as well. What I can't decide (and why I will continue to tune into the games when I can) is whether these are issues of a team in transition - one that will find existing players to plug those holes created by graduation and unexpected departures, or whether these are fundamental talent gaps that only recruiting can resolve. And at how successful Coach Tinkle is at devising a system that plays to his team's strengths and somehow hides these deficiencies. (That said, I fear for the fact that walk-ons have played such a large role in this team thus far. I hope Coach Tinkle is sending some sort of effort/PT sort of message to scholarship players, or awaiting Kone/Dew emerging and riding out the injuries, but fear for the alternative explanations :-). Lucky for me, I started following the Beavers in 1987. I was quickly disabused of the notion that we were a perennial March Madness team starting in the early 90s :-). Go Beavs! Not trying to refute the general message, but I have to say that the last thing we miss from Duvivier is his ball-handling! He was a turnover machine when he took over primary ball-handling responsibilities. Just made me nervous every time he experienced pressure - even when he didn't. Malcolm played hard on D, and was a good teammate, but the ball-handler that we miss most that should have returned (other than Stevie) is Bruce. That kid was really coming on offensively, and his quickness and handles were a major asset against pressure. I never heard what truly happened with Bruce, but it really sucks that he's gone. We would be a vastly different (and better) team right now just having him to attack, threaten teams from the arc, and give us some confidence and energy out there! I will completely agree with you that Duvivier was a mixed bag - as were a number of the Robinson recruits - they had some weakness or another (ranging from inconsistency to bad choices to.....) that made them a liability of some sort or another. I think the current crop of guards' current ball handling skills and decision making out there leaves so much to be desired that we *even* miss Duvivier's ball handling. We really miss what Bruce brought to the party late - no telling if he was going to sustain that momentum however..... Go Beavs!
|
|