|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Oct 26, 2016 14:15:29 GMT -8
Of course none of us knows if Nall is recovered, but since he's listed as questionable I would say "not play". I think the most important piece of the offense is him, and when he's 100% he's a game changer. Let Pierce and Cook have a shot to build on their previous solid performances.
|
|
|
|
Post by ReserRowdy on Oct 26, 2016 14:50:51 GMT -8
I completely agree. We need him healthy for the long haul. I'd rather him miss this game and be healthy the rest of the year than play now and only be 60% for a couple games.
However, I heard in the GA interview on Canzano's radio show that he expects Nall to play this weekend.
|
|
|
|
Post by steinlager on Oct 26, 2016 15:44:46 GMT -8
I like watching Nall play but not at the expense of reinjuring himself if he isn't healed up. I'm sure he and the coaches are weighing the pros and cons of playing against WSU. A healthy Nall would be huge for the final games of the season and particularly against the ucks. |
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Oct 26, 2016 17:06:24 GMT -8
I think Cook can fill in reasonably well while Nall gets healthy.
A healthy Nall and Cook with Pierce and Lucas for change of pace backs would be a nice group of running backs to have for the Civil War. Dear God please let us beat Oregon this year, I can't take it any more.
|
|
|
|
Post by sessbeav on Oct 27, 2016 8:45:45 GMT -8
Amen OA. The suffering has to end.
|
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Oct 27, 2016 13:57:52 GMT -8
It's got to be tough for these kids who only get 12 games a year to be told they have to miss one because they're not 100%. Football is kind of unfair that way. You miss a game or two of basketball or baseball, no problem. There's 30-50 other games to be played.
|
|
