|
|
Post by 86BEAVER on Jun 25, 2024 2:33:34 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Jun 25, 2024 10:46:11 GMT -8
I really like the idea of the Big 12 Pacific Division. Makes a lot of sense, at least to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by NativeBeav on Jun 25, 2024 11:18:06 GMT -8
I really like the idea of the Big 12 Pacific Division. Makes a lot of sense, at least to me. Mostly agree - except I will always have trouble with Colorado, Utah and Arizona being in something called the "Pacific Division" - maybe just western division, or similar? |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jun 25, 2024 13:42:38 GMT -8
I really like the idea of the Big 12 Pacific Division. Makes a lot of sense, at least to me. Mostly agree - except I will always have trouble with Colorado, Utah and Arizona being in something called the "Pacific Division" - maybe just western division, or similar? Plus this insider source is "cougfan"! And, really? Folks are paying attention to the lawsuits. 😮 |
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jun 25, 2024 16:11:45 GMT -8
Cougfan is a 247Sports web site.
The article also used Canzano as a source.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jun 25, 2024 16:30:42 GMT -8
Mostly agree - except I will always have trouble with Colorado, Utah and Arizona being in something called the "Pacific Division" - maybe just western division, or similar? Plus this insider source is "cougfan"! And, really? Folks are paying attention to the lawsuits. 😮 Florida State appealed in North Carolina and defeated the ACC's Motion to Dismiss in Florida just last week. The ACC is still doing a great job at stalling for time. Really fun to watch the back and forth between the two. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jun 25, 2024 21:18:45 GMT -8
Cougfan is a 247Sports web site. The article also used Canzano as a source. Lol... do you smell what you're cooking? He quoted JC. He quoted a JC scenario, he wasn't a source. There isn't a source. It's a guy spouting the obvious. It's his thoughts. College athletic departments all pay attention to conference litigation, policy changes, and news. |
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jun 25, 2024 21:47:53 GMT -8
Cougfan is a 247Sports web site. The article also used Canzano as a source. Lol... do you smell what you're cooking? He quoted JC. He quoted a JC scenario, he wasn't a source. There isn't a source. It's a guy spouting the obvious. It's his thoughts. College athletic departments all pay attention to conference litigation, policy changes, and news. I'm not "cooking" anything. I merely pointed out where the writer was getting his info. But the deeper reality here is your constant denial and argument against any realignment talk as if it's just nonsense. Canzano doesn't make up the scenarios he reports. Nor do the people that work at credible web sites or newspaper reporters, etc. The are talking about the future of the ACC and how it might effect other conferences. And that includes the Pac-12. The actual outcome for OSU could be one of many different scenarios. And those reporters, journalists and yes, even some podcasters are working to piece it together. And pretty much all of them are focused on the ongoing litigation and general situation of the ACC as the foundation for their work. So all this speculation that you love to mock and hate so much has a real, factual base. That's the reality and it doesn't matter how much you rage against it. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jun 25, 2024 23:22:46 GMT -8
Lol... do you smell what you're cooking? He quoted JC. He quoted a JC scenario, he wasn't a source. There isn't a source. It's a guy spouting the obvious. It's his thoughts. College athletic departments all pay attention to conference litigation, policy changes, and news. I'm not "cooking" anything. I merely pointed out where the writer was getting his info. But the deeper reality here is your constant denial and argument against any realignment talk as if it's just nonsense. Canzano doesn't make up the scenarios he reports. Nor do the people that work at credible web sites or newspaper reporters, etc. The are talking about the future of the ACC and how it might effect other conferences. And that includes the Pac-12. The actual outcome for OSU could be one of many different scenarios. And those reporters, journalists and yes, even some podcasters are working to piece it together. And pretty much all of them are focused on the ongoing litigation and general situation of the ACC as the foundation for their work. So all this speculation that you love to mock and hate so much has a real, factual base. That's the reality and it doesn't matter how much you rage against it. LMAO... "hate"? It's laughter... The pod cast didn't get info from JC, he posted info from someone more credible than him in an attempt to support his point. And, as stated he has none. Everyone already realizes this stuff is being watched. But, keeping track of a situation doesn't necessarily lead to a specific conclusion. Credible reporters or sites don't propose, make up scenarios, create possible situations... and your saying that they're factual? Read... "insider John Canzano took the ACC collapse scenario several steps further, proposing a potential "Pacific Division" in the Big 12 using eight teams from the former Pac-12. "The Big 12 has done a great job of positioning itself as the solid (but distant) No. 3 conference," Canzano wrote. "Let's suppose that the ACC eventually splinters. Would the formation of a 'Pacific Division' in the Big 12 that included Stanford, Cal, OSU, WSU, and the four Pac-12 members Yormark already poached (Arizona, ASU, Utah, Colorado) provide a counter-balance to the Big Ten and SEC's stranglehold? Or would that spread the Big 12 too thin and geographically far-reaching?" Is any of that factual? Like some scoop he knows is being discussed? Proposed, supposed... vs I've been told, or heard from conference sources? Nope, it's made up click bait. Pretty much what all pod casts and similar discussions are. They toss out ideas, opinions, possibilities. Hate... FFS🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by darthbeavs on Jun 26, 2024 7:42:56 GMT -8
I'm not "cooking" anything. I merely pointed out where the writer was getting his info. But the deeper reality here is your constant denial and argument against any realignment talk as if it's just nonsense. Canzano doesn't make up the scenarios he reports. Nor do the people that work at credible web sites or newspaper reporters, etc. The are talking about the future of the ACC and how it might effect other conferences. And that includes the Pac-12. The actual outcome for OSU could be one of many different scenarios. And those reporters, journalists and yes, even some podcasters are working to piece it together. And pretty much all of them are focused on the ongoing litigation and general situation of the ACC as the foundation for their work. So all this speculation that you love to mock and hate so much has a real, factual base. That's the reality and it doesn't matter how much you rage against it. LMAO... "hate"? It's laughter... The pod cast didn't get info from JC, he posted info from someone more credible than him in an attempt to support his point. And, as stated he has none. Everyone already realizes this stuff is being watched. But, keeping track of a situation doesn't necessarily lead to a specific conclusion. Credible reporters or sites don't propose, make up scenarios, create possible situations... and your saying that they're factual? Read... "insider John Canzano took the ACC collapse scenario several steps further, proposing a potential "Pacific Division" in the Big 12 using eight teams from the former Pac-12. "The Big 12 has done a great job of positioning itself as the solid (but distant) No. 3 conference," Canzano wrote. "Let's suppose that the ACC eventually splinters. Would the formation of a 'Pacific Division' in the Big 12 that included Stanford, Cal, OSU, WSU, and the four Pac-12 members Yormark already poached (Arizona, ASU, Utah, Colorado) provide a counter-balance to the Big Ten and SEC's stranglehold? Or would that spread the Big 12 too thin and geographically far-reaching?" Is any of that factual? Like some scoop he knows is being discussed? Proposed, supposed... vs I've been told, or heard from conference sources? Nope, it's made up click bait. Pretty much what all pod casts and similar discussions are. They toss out ideas, opinions, possibilities. Hate... FFS🤣 You bust people's chops on here more than anyone else on the site. Methinks you need a few more milligrams in your edible  |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jun 26, 2024 8:06:45 GMT -8
LMAO... "hate"? It's laughter... The pod cast didn't get info from JC, he posted info from someone more credible than him in an attempt to support his point. And, as stated he has none. Everyone already realizes this stuff is being watched. But, keeping track of a situation doesn't necessarily lead to a specific conclusion. Credible reporters or sites don't propose, make up scenarios, create possible situations... and your saying that they're factual? Read... "insider John Canzano took the ACC collapse scenario several steps further, proposing a potential "Pacific Division" in the Big 12 using eight teams from the former Pac-12. "The Big 12 has done a great job of positioning itself as the solid (but distant) No. 3 conference," Canzano wrote. "Let's suppose that the ACC eventually splinters. Would the formation of a 'Pacific Division' in the Big 12 that included Stanford, Cal, OSU, WSU, and the four Pac-12 members Yormark already poached (Arizona, ASU, Utah, Colorado) provide a counter-balance to the Big Ten and SEC's stranglehold? Or would that spread the Big 12 too thin and geographically far-reaching?" Is any of that factual? Like some scoop he knows is being discussed? Proposed, supposed... vs I've been told, or heard from conference sources? Nope, it's made up click bait. Pretty much what all pod casts and similar discussions are. They toss out ideas, opinions, possibilities. Hate... FFS🤣 You bust people's chops on here more than anyone else on the site. Methinks you need a few more milligrams in your edible Ahhh, another new "surge" of monthly posts. Adding to May's truly enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here, an equally astute prescription. Can't wait until July. |
|
|
|
Post by darthbeavs on Jun 26, 2024 8:27:37 GMT -8
You bust people's chops on here more than anyone else on the site. Methinks you need a few more milligrams in your edible Ahhh, another new "surge" of monthly posts. Adding to May's truly enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here, an equally astute prescription. Can't wait until July.  |
|
|
|
Post by beavfan14 on Jun 27, 2024 11:58:15 GMT -8
Ahhh, another new "surge" of monthly posts. Adding to May's truly enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here, an equally astute prescription. Can't wait until July. No, it doesn't make sense. Just another one of his, I know better then anyone, posts proving nothing. Hence the "enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here", like it's his choice of what people can or want to post. He posts a lot, but says nothing. I for one enjoy talking about different scenarios, even if they are just a pipe dream. But really, who cares if they are? Theres not much else to talk about right now. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jun 27, 2024 15:34:50 GMT -8
No, it doesn't make sense. Just another one of his, I know better then anyone, posts proving nothing. Hence the "enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here", like it's his choice of what people can or want to post. He posts a lot, but says nothing. I for one enjoy talking about different scenarios, even if they are just a pipe dream. But really, who cares if they are? Theres not much else to talk about right now. You might actually want to know what you are talking about before you speak nonsense! It was the OP who told folks what should or should not be posted here on a Beaver board. Specifically any Duck postings/info/comments. FFS at least be intelligent enough to use the history portion of this site and you can at least try and minimize your lame, and misguided attempt at some type of diss. At least you followed suit with his GIF!  |
|
|
|
Post by darthbeavs on Jun 28, 2024 13:28:07 GMT -8
No, it doesn't make sense. Just another one of his, I know better then anyone, posts proving nothing. Hence the "enlightened series of what shouldn't be posted here", like it's his choice of what people can or want to post. He posts a lot, but says nothing. I for one enjoy talking about different scenarios, even if they are just a pipe dream. But really, who cares if they are? Theres not much else to talk about right now. You might actually want to know what you are talking about before you speak nonsense! It was the OP who told folks what should or should not be posted here on a Beaver board. Specifically any Duck postings/info/comments. FFS at least be intelligent enough to use the history portion of this site and you can at least try and minimize your lame, and misguided attempt at some type of diss. At least you followed suit with his GIF!  |
|
