|
|
Post by beaverinohio on May 2, 2024 11:39:41 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on May 2, 2024 11:41:47 GMT -8
With this kid and the one from SIU-E, might have one hell of a rebounding backcourt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on May 2, 2024 13:47:23 GMT -8
Toledo is an excellent program, has won the last 4 or 5 MAC regular-season titles. This is a good get.
Not sure we need Dexter to come back, he hasn't committed anywhere that I've seen. He'd be good depth but this guy has to start.
|
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on May 2, 2024 14:09:48 GMT -8
Toledo is an excellent program, has won the last 4 or 5 MAC regular-season titles. This is a good get. Not sure we need Dexter to come back, he hasn't committed anywhere that I've seen. He'd be good depth but this guy has to start. Agree on Toledo. Illini were in on a transfer PG from there last year (went to Texas or TA&M Ithink) and a combo guard this year (not this kid) that went to Xavier. Don’t think Cochran is quite at the level of either of those two, but like you said a good get. Also will give Beavers a starting backcourt from Illinois. As to Dexter, I think I saw that both he and Chol were looking for opportunities overseas rather than transferring to another school. Not sure how accurate that is though. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on May 2, 2024 16:12:59 GMT -8
Toledo is an excellent program, has won the last 4 or 5 MAC regular-season titles. This is a good get. Not sure we need Dexter to come back, he hasn't committed anywhere that I've seen. He'd be good depth but this guy has to start. Toledo won the last four MAC Regular Season Championships. Toledo also won two of three Division Championships before that. Six MAC West Championships in the past seven years. And eight MAC West Championships over the past 12 complete seasons. And yet Toledo has just been awful in the MAC Tournament. Toledo last won the MAC Tournament back in 1980. Toledo played in the NIT five years from 2014-2023, losing right away each time. |
|
|
|
Post by seastape on May 3, 2024 4:29:01 GMT -8
Nice get. We need good guard play.
|
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on May 3, 2024 8:33:20 GMT -8
Nice get. We need good guard play. Obviously need to see the two guard transfers play and how well they do at a higher level and mesh, but not crazy to think those two could be as good as our starting backcourt this year. Still will miss Pope’s ability to hit big shots. But love that Cochran was a co-D conference player of the year. I believe that leaves one more open spot. Interested to see what direction they go. Think we could use a 4 with some experience. Depending on how Meithof’s rehab is going and how they plan to use Rataj this year, might look for a 2 or 3 though. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on May 3, 2024 9:46:43 GMT -8
Nice get. We need good guard play. Obviously need to see the two guard transfers play and how well they do at a higher level and mesh, but not crazy to think those two could be as good as our starting backcourt this year. Still will miss Pope’s ability to hit big shots. But love that Cochran was a co-D conference player of the year. I believe that leaves one more open spot. Interested to see what direction they go. Think we could use a 4 with some experience. Depending on how Meithof’s rehab is going and how they plan to use Rataj this year, might look for a 2 or 3 though. With all the former players returning it was unknown how good the MBB team would be. They did not mature and play well last season and no one will convince me it was going to be much better even though the win # in the WCC would be better than the Pac12. It appeared many were on their own wavelength and the team was disjointed because of it. Maybe due to the fact that 15-20 games in some players maybe have already decided they were gone?! I'll go out on the "hoop limb" and say this backcourt is better than what would have returned. First, they want to be here and WT's message will not be ignored. Second, they have numbers, albeit vs lesser competition, that Pope & Dexter could only dream of. Akanno played hard sporadically, and Pope played zero defense and his assist and rebound numbers were ridiculously low for someone that athletic. Lake, Meithof, Craig, Williford, and Minor will be just fine... Sy, Ndong. Marrs, Marsh, Fallah, Rataj, Garrison give OSU decent size and solid athleticism in the front court. I see a need for another Marsh type, solid body big as the others are slight and will have trouble with other solid bigs on defense. |
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,837 
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on May 3, 2024 11:21:47 GMT -8
I admit I have a re-kindled interest in MBB as a result of the turnover....
This revamping of the roster lets me see if perhaps the new recruits might be more "coachable": I really think WT is a quality individual, and even his level of engagement with players on the bench and coming on and off the floor makes me think he is providing coaching, just not sure if it is landing with some of the players. To your point, this crop of players "want to be here and WT's message will not be ignored".
Could be a fun season from a player and development point of view, and I believe that from a WCC standpoint the cupboard is not bare for WT, and to your point, the backcourt might even be better. Let's see what he does with it.
Go Beavers!
|
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on May 3, 2024 11:22:51 GMT -8
Obviously need to see the two guard transfers play and how well they do at a higher level and mesh, but not crazy to think those two could be as good as our starting backcourt this year. Still will miss Pope’s ability to hit big shots. But love that Cochran was a co-D conference player of the year. I believe that leaves one more open spot. Interested to see what direction they go. Think we could use a 4 with some experience. Depending on how Meithof’s rehab is going and how they plan to use Rataj this year, might look for a 2 or 3 though. With all the former players returning it was unknown how good the MBB team would be. They did not mature and play well last season and no one will convince me it was going to be much better even though the win # in the WCC would be better than the Pac12. It appeared many were on their own wavelength and the team was disjointed because of it. Maybe due to the fact that 15-20 games in some players maybe have already decided they were gone?! I'll go out on the "hoop limb" and say this backcourt is better than what would have returned. First, they want to be here and WT's message will not be ignored. Second, they have numbers, albeit vs lesser competition, that Pope & Dexter could only dream of. Akanno played hard sporadically, and Pope played zero defense and his assist and rebound numbers were ridiculously low for someone that athletic. Lake, Meithof, Craig, Williford, and Minor will be just fine... Sy, Ndong. Marrs, Marsh, Fallah, Rataj, Garrison give OSU decent size and solid athleticism in the front court. I see a need for another Marsh type, solid body big as the others are slight and will have trouble with other solid bigs on defense. I pretty much agree with everything you said, but would add liking to see that last "Marsh type" player having at least 2 years of eligibility left. Can't help but wonder if some of the kids had made decisions early, Takethatbeav had pretty much said that was the case early on, I wanted to take that with a grain of salt, if it was the case it likely couldn't have not changed the team dynamics at least a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on May 3, 2024 11:34:32 GMT -8
With all the former players returning it was unknown how good the MBB team would be. They did not mature and play well last season and no one will convince me it was going to be much better even though the win # in the WCC would be better than the Pac12. It appeared many were on their own wavelength and the team was disjointed because of it. Maybe due to the fact that 15-20 games in some players maybe have already decided they were gone?! I'll go out on the "hoop limb" and say this backcourt is better than what would have returned. First, they want to be here and WT's message will not be ignored. Second, they have numbers, albeit vs lesser competition, that Pope & Dexter could only dream of. Akanno played hard sporadically, and Pope played zero defense and his assist and rebound numbers were ridiculously low for someone that athletic. Lake, Meithof, Craig, Williford, and Minor will be just fine... Sy, Ndong. Marrs, Marsh, Fallah, Rataj, Garrison give OSU decent size and solid athleticism in the front court. I see a need for another Marsh type, solid body big as the others are slight and will have trouble with other solid bigs on defense. I pretty much agree with everything you said, but would add liking to see that last "Marsh type" player having at least 2 years of eligibility left. Can't help but wonder if some of the kids had made decisions early, Takethatbeav had pretty much said that was the case early on, I wanted to take that with a grain of salt, if it was the case it likely couldn't have not changed the team dynamics at least a bit. I'm not sure how to word this without it being taken wrong as is often the case here... poorly worded or misinterpreted. But, whether folks like it or not despite the anomaly of certain recruits and a E8, OSU is in many ways far closer to a WCC hoops program than a P4 program. The overall changes in college athletics has created a much large division in AD budgets. And, in a way I'm fine with not always having to keep up with the Jones'. And, in that light I will say WT is now in a situation where he "fits". My criticism of him was never about his personality or character. More all the aspects where he was out of his "league". He fit Montana's culture and the culture of that conference, level of play/recruiting. And, that is where OSU will basically be for the time being. He was not the coach to make P4 chicken crap into P4 chicken salad... not many are. He will immediately become a better "coach" next year. And, in deference to all those that will disagree, OSU will become better off not being part of a Super conference. I sort of get tired of all the disparaging comments of those schools that are choosing that route. So be it, for most it is who they are. For some they will soon learn they are indeed not "super" with regard to the monetary investments needed to sustain being relevant. I have no idea how all this pans out, proably it will not for maybe 3-5 years?! But, OSU will be better off not trying to pretend it belongs with schools with AD budgets that are 2, 3+ times as large. |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on May 3, 2024 11:53:34 GMT -8
I pretty much agree with everything you said, but would add liking to see that last "Marsh type" player having at least 2 years of eligibility left. Can't help but wonder if some of the kids had made decisions early, Takethatbeav had pretty much said that was the case early on, I wanted to take that with a grain of salt, if it was the case it likely couldn't have not changed the team dynamics at least a bit. I'm not sure how to word this without it being taken wrong as is often the case here... poorly worded or misinterpreted. But, whether folks like it or not despite the anomaly of certain recruits and a E8, OSU is in many ways far closer to a WCC hoops program than a P4 program. The overall changes in college athletics has created a much large division in AD budgets. And, in a way I'm fine with not always having to keep up with the Jones'. And, in that light I will say WT is now in a situation where he "fits". My criticism of him was never about his personality or character. More all the aspects where he was out of his "league". He fit Montana's culture and the culture of that conference, level of play/recruiting. And, that is where OSU will basically be for the time being. He was not the coach to make P4 chicken crap into P4 chicken salad... not many are. He will immediately become a better "coach" next year. And, in deference to all those that will disagree, OSU will become better off not being part of a Super conference. I sort of get tired of all the disparaging comments of those schools that are choosing that route. So be it, for most it is who they are. For some they will soon learn they are indeed not "super" with regard to the monetary investments needed to sustain being relevant. I have no idea how all this pans out, proably it will not for maybe 3-5 years?! But, OSU will be better off not trying to pretend it belongs with schools with AD budgets that are 2, 3+ times as large. Agreed. I've said for years OSU is underbudgeted in basketball, especially in recruiting and support, compared to most of the rest of the Power conference teams, and that it's success likely wouldn't change with a new coach... yet the coach has been blamed for OSU's issues. Until the budgeting changes, this is a more appropriate conference level to achieve and maintain success. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on May 3, 2024 12:45:53 GMT -8
I pretty much agree with everything you said, but would add liking to see that last "Marsh type" player having at least 2 years of eligibility left. Can't help but wonder if some of the kids had made decisions early, Takethatbeav had pretty much said that was the case early on, I wanted to take that with a grain of salt, if it was the case it likely couldn't have not changed the team dynamics at least a bit. I'm not sure how to word this without it being taken wrong as is often the case here... poorly worded or misinterpreted. But, whether folks like it or not despite the anomaly of certain recruits and a E8, OSU is in many ways far closer to a WCC hoops program than a P4 program. The overall changes in college athletics has created a much large division in AD budgets. And, in a way I'm fine with not always having to keep up with the Jones'. And, in that light I will say WT is now in a situation where he "fits". My criticism of him was never about his personality or character. More all the aspects where he was out of his "league". He fit Montana's culture and the culture of that conference, level of play/recruiting. And, that is where OSU will basically be for the time being. He was not the coach to make P4 chicken crap into P4 chicken salad... not many are. He will immediately become a better "coach" next year. And, in deference to all those that will disagree, OSU will become better off not being part of a Super conference. I sort of get tired of all the disparaging comments of those schools that are choosing that route. So be it, for most it is who they are. For some they will soon learn they are indeed not "super" with regard to the monetary investments needed to sustain being relevant. I have no idea how all this pans out, proably it will not for maybe 3-5 years?! But, OSU will be better off not trying to pretend it belongs with schools with AD budgets that are 2, 3+ times as large.I think this is especially true in football. |
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,837
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on May 3, 2024 13:28:32 GMT -8
I'm not sure how to word this without it being taken wrong as is often the case here... poorly worded or misinterpreted. But, whether folks like it or not despite the anomaly of certain recruits and a E8, OSU is in many ways far closer to a WCC hoops program than a P4 program. The overall changes in college athletics has created a much large division in AD budgets. And, in a way I'm fine with not always having to keep up with the Jones'. And, in that light I will say WT is now in a situation where he "fits". My criticism of him was never about his personality or character. More all the aspects where he was out of his "league". He fit Montana's culture and the culture of that conference, level of play/recruiting. And, that is where OSU will basically be for the time being. He was not the coach to make P4 chicken crap into P4 chicken salad... not many are. He will immediately become a better "coach" next year. And, in deference to all those that will disagree, OSU will become better off not being part of a Super conference. I sort of get tired of all the disparaging comments of those schools that are choosing that route. So be it, for most it is who they are. For some they will soon learn they are indeed not "super" with regard to the monetary investments needed to sustain being relevant. I have no idea how all this pans out, proably it will not for maybe 3-5 years?! But, OSU will be better off not trying to pretend it belongs with schools with AD budgets that are 2, 3+ times as large.I think this is especially true in football. And I think between some funding available to us from the Pac-12 -> Pac-2 transition allowing a "soft landing" into whatever the new reality is, and NOT having to "keep up with the Jones'" the way UA and UW and ASU etc. have to, we hopefully won't find ourselves in the kind of "fiscal bind" that those schools have at present or will likely arrive at soon. As the saying goes, "you might win the rat race, but you'll still be a rat" led these schools into the rat-like behavior that blew up the Pac-12 - much of that was fiscal issues, and looking for ways to deal with the fact that someone somewhere has to pay for those large AD budgets..... Go Beavers! |
|
|
|
Post by seastape on May 3, 2024 16:30:14 GMT -8
I pretty much agree with everything you said, but would add liking to see that last "Marsh type" player having at least 2 years of eligibility left. Can't help but wonder if some of the kids had made decisions early, Takethatbeav had pretty much said that was the case early on, I wanted to take that with a grain of salt, if it was the case it likely couldn't have not changed the team dynamics at least a bit. I'm not sure how to word this without it being taken wrong as is often the case here... poorly worded or misinterpreted. But, whether folks like it or not despite the anomaly of certain recruits and a E8, OSU is in many ways far closer to a WCC hoops program than a P4 program. The overall changes in college athletics has created a much large division in AD budgets. And, in a way I'm fine with not always having to keep up with the Jones'. And, in that light I will say WT is now in a situation where he "fits". My criticism of him was never about his personality or character. More all the aspects where he was out of his "league". He fit Montana's culture and the culture of that conference, level of play/recruiting. And, that is where OSU will basically be for the time being. He was not the coach to make P4 chicken crap into P4 chicken salad... not many are. He will immediately become a better "coach" next year. And, in deference to all those that will disagree, OSU will become better off not being part of a Super conference. I sort of get tired of all the disparaging comments of those schools that are choosing that route. So be it, for most it is who they are. For some they will soon learn they are indeed not "super" with regard to the monetary investments needed to sustain being relevant. I have no idea how all this pans out, proably it will not for maybe 3-5 years?! But, OSU will be better off not trying to pretend it belongs with schools with AD budgets that are 2, 3+ times as large. Agreed. Trying to monetarily keep up with UW, usc, and Ohio State is a ridiculous notion. I think it would be tough even in the Big 12 considering the population in Texas and the football fanaticism of the region. I think the sporting future for OSU can be very positive in a G5 conference, and it's why I will be very content when the Pac 2 finally integrates MWC teams into the Pac. That's my prediction, at least. |
|
