|
|
Post by beavaristotle on Mar 19, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -8
Not sure how I feel about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by ag87 on Mar 19, 2024 18:22:01 GMT -8
Cal Tech? Minot State?
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGlove on Mar 19, 2024 19:12:03 GMT -8
Link?
|
|
|
|
Post by osubeaver2018 on Mar 19, 2024 22:41:32 GMT -8
Every Pac-12 team received an invite. With the new NIT rules this year the regular season conference champions that didn't win their conference tournaments didn't automatically get an invite. Instead the top 2 teams in NET from each power conference got an invite and a top 4 seed+guaranteed home game and the rest was filled with at large bids. So for OSU to have been invited every PAC school above us had to say no. And then we also said no which is why just Utah is playing in the NIT for the PAC. Interesting we'd turn down a home game but I guess everyone else did too so maybe we did it out of principle. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Mar 19, 2024 23:59:56 GMT -8
Every Pac-12 team received an invite. With the new NIT rules this year the regular season conference champions that didn't win their conference tournaments didn't automatically get an invite. Instead the top 2 teams in NET from each power conference got an invite and a top 4 seed+guaranteed home game and the rest was filled with at large bids. So for OSU to have been invited every PAC school above us had to say no. And then we also said no which is why just Utah is playing in the NIT for the PAC. Interesting we'd turn down a home game but I guess everyone else did too so maybe we did it out of principle. From everything that I read, only the first two teams in the Pac-12 received an invite. There may have been some extreme confusion here on someone's part or multiple people's parts. |
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on Mar 20, 2024 3:13:08 GMT -8
If this is true, and it seems hard to believe, I want to change my answer in the “time to get rid of NIT” thread. If they’re inviting 5 win conference teams, it is time to get rid of tournament.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Mar 20, 2024 9:59:34 GMT -8
We didn't deserve a bid, obviously. Gottlieb's had a mad-on for us since his brother got fired.
|
|
|
|
Post by beaverinohio on Mar 20, 2024 10:42:49 GMT -8
Well all I can say is I’m glad they had to turn them down. The Tinklette’s would have declared the rebuild a success and say it was only fitting since Wayne got an earlier NIT stollen from him.
|
|
|
|
Post by obf on Mar 20, 2024 10:55:24 GMT -8
I need some additional evidence to believe this... I can't imagine this team getting an invite (it is the invite that I don't buy)
|
|
|
|
Post by ochobeavo on Mar 20, 2024 11:22:46 GMT -8
My understanding is that we were asked, it rightfully came as a complete surprise, couldn't have pulled it off as some players had already finished finals and had left town.
|
|
rafer
Sophomore
Posts: 1,640 
|
Post by rafer on Mar 20, 2024 12:03:39 GMT -8
Well all I can say is I’m glad they had to turn them down. The Tinklette’s would have declared the rebuild a success and say it was only fitting since Wayne got an earlier NIT stollen from him. What would make you happy Re: MBB? 1). Fire Tinkle(drum out of town), 2). replace all players with backup players on other teams in portal, (maybe tear down Gill), 3). hire Mike K?? That do it? Who's going to pay for this tear down/coach debt? Who will come here, coach or players, to play in the WCC/MWC? Details please. |
|
|
|
Post by beaverbeliever71 on Mar 20, 2024 12:06:46 GMT -8
I need some additional evidence to believe this... I can't imagine this team getting an invite (it is the invite that I don't buy) |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Mar 20, 2024 12:14:32 GMT -8
I am still confused, the NIT bid order was:
1. Utah (Accepted)
2. Washington (Declined)
3. USC
4. UCLA
5. Stanford
6. Arizona State
7. Oregon State
According to USC, they were never asked. How did it skip over USC?
|
|
|
|
Post by bvrbooster on Mar 20, 2024 12:21:44 GMT -8
I am still confused, the NIT bid order was: 1. Utah (Accepted)
2. Washington (Declined)
3. USC
4. UCLA
5. Stanford
6. Arizona State
7. Oregon State
According to USC, they were never asked. How did it skip over USC?
I don't know, but skipping over USC is always a good idea. |
|
ftd
Junior
"I think real leaders show up when times are hard." Trent Bray 11/29/2023
Posts: 2,553
|
Post by ftd on Mar 20, 2024 15:30:16 GMT -8
I am still confused, the NIT bid order was: 1. Utah (Accepted)
2. Washington (Declined)
3. USC
4. UCLA
5. Stanford
6. Arizona State
7. Oregon State
According to USC, they were never asked. How did it skip over USC?
I don't know, but skipping over USC is always a good idea. I think 3-6 also declined...we HAD to decline because several players completed winter term and left campus for spring break...at least that's what I read on the O |
|
