|
|
Post by EmeraldEmpire on Feb 23, 2024 14:04:58 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by hottubbeaver on Feb 23, 2024 14:32:59 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS"
Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday?
|
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Feb 23, 2024 14:43:09 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS" Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday? That was my question when I first read about the lawsuit. Things will be interesting. Other posters said at the time that this wouldn’t happen, but I have to see some clarification. |
|
|
|
Post by TheGlove on Feb 23, 2024 16:55:33 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS" Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday? How would that work with school? Ya know, the reason college football exists. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Feb 23, 2024 17:06:31 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS" Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday? It could possibly mean that, yeah. Unlikely that it would be midseason for football. But you could see a transfer after the first couple of games or toward season's end. I could see that. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 23, 2024 17:22:33 GMT -8
Players like students, can transfer anytime they want. Always could.
This ruling is more about the number of times a player can transfer. But, in any case they have to be accepted to a school... meet admission standards etc. Also, transferring doesn't mean they are immediately eligible, nor are NCAA rules for playing limits changed.
|
|
|
|
Post by messi on Feb 23, 2024 21:03:23 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS" Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday? How would that work with school? Ya know, the reason college football exists. I ain't come here to play school |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Feb 23, 2024 21:16:51 GMT -8
I’m out. And I predict that many schools drop major athletics all together. Maybe not tomorrow or the next day, but soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Feb 23, 2024 21:19:28 GMT -8
"NO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS" Hmm, read literally, am I right in concluding a player could transfer midseason after playing for team X and appear on the field for team W the following Saturday? It could possibly mean that, yeah. Unlikely that it would be midseason for football. But you could see a transfer after the first couple of games or toward season's end. I could see that. Schools have a drop-dead date in every semester or term by which you must be enrolled. Nobody is gonna enroll someplace in late October or early November. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 23, 2024 21:30:47 GMT -8
It could possibly mean that, yeah. Unlikely that it would be midseason for football. But you could see a transfer after the first couple of games or toward season's end. I could see that. Schools have a drop-dead date in every semester or term by which you must be enrolled. Nobody is gonna enroll someplace in late October or early November. And, they have to be academically accepted. Again this is more about limiting players to a one-time portal use. It's not like this ruling means it's like guys at Dixon changing teams at will. |
|
|
|
Post by matt90 on Feb 24, 2024 8:01:52 GMT -8
I think that all of the transfer, NIL, etc. 'rules' will be negotiated in collective bargaining agreements. I would suggest having one 'players union' (for lack of a better term) football, one for men's and women's hoops, and one for all other sports. The players can then negotiate with the conferences, the NCAA (if that continues to be a thing) and the schools.
I think that this will take a couple of years to put together, but if something like this does not happen, this whole thing might implode.
|
|
|
|
Post by bucktoothvarmit on Feb 26, 2024 10:43:20 GMT -8
I’m out. And I predict that many schools drop major athletics all together. Maybe not tomorrow or the next day, but soon. I'm with you spud. Been struggling with this for a while. I really enjoy football Saturdays in Reser but the amount of money that has flooded into college football makes me feel like a chump. The only fix I can see is a nation wide boycott of all TV coverage of CFB and supporting your team in person. I don't see that happening but I am going to do my part. F espn, fox, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by NativeBeav on Feb 26, 2024 10:59:01 GMT -8
I’m out. And I predict that many schools drop major athletics all together. Maybe not tomorrow or the next day, but soon. I'm with you spud. Been struggling with this for a while. I really enjoy football Saturdays in Reser but the amount of money that has flooded into college football makes me feel like a chump. The only fix I can see is a nation wide boycott of all TV coverage of CFB and supporting your team in person. I don't see that happening but I am going to do my part. F espn, fox, etc. I agree with you - too bad boycotts rarely work; people have short attention spans, and unless they are like me, they are unable to keep up their disdain over the long run (lol). As Glove reminded me recently, even though the NFL took a short term hit for going political, and they are still political, people's desire for TV entertainment outweighs their weak principles. And this is usually the case in life. Too bad, it is what it is. But, I pledge to do my part!  |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 26, 2024 11:19:42 GMT -8
I'm with you spud. Been struggling with this for a while. I really enjoy football Saturdays in Reser but the amount of money that has flooded into college football makes me feel like a chump. The only fix I can see is a nation wide boycott of all TV coverage of CFB and supporting your team in person. I don't see that happening but I am going to do my part. F espn, fox, etc. I agree with you - too bad boycotts rarely work; people have short attention spans, and unless they are like me, they are unable to keep up their disdain over the long run (lol). As Glove reminded me recently, even though the NFL took a short term hit for going political, and they are still political, people's desire for TV entertainment outweighs their weak principles. And this is usually the case in life. Too bad, it is what it is. But, I pledge to do my part! Plus it comes done to discretionary $. An expensive TV/cable package eventually serves the entire family and for the most part is far cheaper per month than taking your family (or those interested) to a game in person. And, that is if you live in the vicinity and aren't adding expensive travel options. Add family responsibilities and activities TV and the ability to record/stream on demand makes viewing games on TV the #1 option for the majority of the population. TV, cable, streaming may advance the technology and involve more partners, but it is not going away. Heck a lot of us attend in person AND watch replays, and store them. The "haves" will eventually branch off, and the rest will make less, but will be able to survive as the inventory will be needed. But, ADs will have to constrain spending and most likely means sports will be cut or go to "club" status. In talking to former D1 coaches I find it interesting that they and their colleagues still coaching see the salary structures as a huge part of the issue and that it will take a big hit. No longer will their be a large pool of money for coaches for most of the D1 schools. And, there will be very limited opportunities at those "have" schools for HC and staffing. As one said, any AD that is not in the upper tier of the ACC, SEC, B10, B12 better start trimming now. And better not be committing huge chunks of their future budgets to coaching staffs. It'll be different and very soon. |
|
|
|
Post by NativeBeav on Feb 26, 2024 12:08:09 GMT -8
I agree with you - too bad boycotts rarely work; people have short attention spans, and unless they are like me, they are unable to keep up their disdain over the long run (lol). As Glove reminded me recently, even though the NFL took a short term hit for going political, and they are still political, people's desire for TV entertainment outweighs their weak principles. And this is usually the case in life. Too bad, it is what it is. But, I pledge to do my part! Plus it comes done to discretionary $. An expensive TV/cable package eventually serves the entire family and for the most part is far cheaper per month than taking your family (or those interested) to a game in person. And, that is if you live in the vicinity and aren't adding expensive travel options. Add family responsibilities and activities TV and the ability to record/stream on demand makes viewing games on TV the #1 option for the majority of the population. TV, cable, streaming may advance the technology and involve more partners, but it is not going away. Heck a lot of us attend in person AND watch replays, and store them. The "haves" will eventually branch off, and the rest will make less, but will be able to survive as the inventory will be needed. But, ADs will have to constrain spending and most likely means sports will be cut or go to "club" status. In talking to former D1 coaches I find it interesting that they and their colleagues still coaching see the salary structures as a huge part of the issue and that it will take a big hit. No longer will their be a large pool of money for coaches for most of the D1 schools. And, there will be very limited opportunities at those "have" schools for HC and staffing. As one said, any AD that is not in the upper tier of the ACC, SEC, B10, B12 better start trimming now. And better not be committing huge chunks of their future budgets to coaching staffs. It'll be different and very soon. So what you are saying is, once the big players in life take control, a small group of people, the "in" crowd benefit - everyone else suffers. Gee, I wonder if that model plays out in the rest of society? Hmmmmmmm  |
|
