|
Post by grad1973 on Jan 21, 2024 19:28:18 GMT -8
You dont want Dom at point guard that ruins her affectiveness. She is good in transition where she can create shots. We have three pt players this just doesnt make sense that they were this inaffective against a stanford in a down year for them. They have more losses and close games this year then most years. The same ugly fact happened like against Cal. No production from the starters in league play. We all had cold feet for some reason this game the team appeared to just have zero confidence today on offense. Beers laughs at your “no production from starters” ok ill name them for you talia reese and aj. Have given us no production in this series. Beers doesnt laugh at things like thst shes not a sinic nor is she sarcastic.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jan 21, 2024 19:29:37 GMT -8
Beers laughs at your “no production from starters” ok ill name them for you talia reese and aj. Have given us no production in this series. Beers doesnt laugh at things like thst shes not a sinic nor is she sarcastic. In English please. And, yes, Beers is a starter.
|
|
beav74
Freshman
Posts: 738
Grad Year: OSU 1974
|
Post by beav74 on Jan 21, 2024 22:15:07 GMT -8
Two starters 35 combined minutes 0-7 fg 0 points.
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Jan 22, 2024 9:36:54 GMT -8
That pesky, little Stanford guard is one heck of a player, and Stanford was so well prepared for everything the Beavers did. Every time that Rueck talked to the Beaver PG, that pesky guard would immediately pressure the PG and would disrupt the Beavers from getting set-up in the offense. Tara knows Scott’s approach well.
|
|
bmoc
Freshman
Posts: 588
|
Post by bmoc on Jan 22, 2024 9:43:11 GMT -8
Happy #25 day!
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Jan 22, 2024 9:47:54 GMT -8
That pesky, little Stanford guard is one heck of a player, and Stanford was so well prepared for everything the Beavers did. Every time that Rueck talked to the Beaver PG, that pesky guard would immediately pressure the PG and would disrupt the Beavers from getting set-up in the offense. Tara knows Scott’s approach well. Drives me a little crazy when Rueck has our PG staring at him while bringing the ball upcourt and the opposing guard is looking to pick their pocket.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jan 23, 2024 11:32:26 GMT -8
Despite all of the interminable hype surrounding Tara V’s career wins record vs OSU, they still fell short of a sellout in their 7,400 seat gym.
That’s hard for me to believe.
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jan 23, 2024 11:49:34 GMT -8
That pesky, little Stanford guard is one heck of a player, and Stanford was so well prepared for everything the Beavers did. Every time that Rueck talked to the Beaver PG, that pesky guard would immediately pressure the PG and would disrupt the Beavers from getting set-up in the offense. Tara knows Scott’s approach well. Drives me a little crazy when Rueck has our PG staring at him while bringing the ball upcourt and the opposing guard is looking to pick their pocket. I think Rueck is a great defensive coach and a very average offensive coach (at least at the Pac-12 level). It would be interesting to see what would happen if he stepped back and let an assistant both coach and run the offense like an OC in football.
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jan 23, 2024 15:34:49 GMT -8
Drives me a little crazy when Rueck has our PG staring at him while bringing the ball upcourt and the opposing guard is looking to pick their pocket. I think Rueck is a great defensive coach and a very average offensive coach (at least at the Pac-12 level). It would be interesting to see what would happen if he stepped back and let an assistant both coach and run the offense like an OC in football. Although the halftime (into the 3rd) was all about arrogant Stanford (good reason on that particular day) both the commentators and guest were very positive toward OSU & Rueck. However, one snippet was meant as a positive and to me is not. I've thought the major issue with his teams from early on were "plays". The constant having to run a play... like he can't coach "freedom" and let chemistry and hoop IQ shine a bit. He wants to imprint himself on every possession. The playbook being "thick" and the comments that we'd never be able to remember all those sets really hit home. Sometimes you need to let athletes "athlete". To this day I'm still convinced that was the basis for the downfall of the coach/player relationship with Destiny (plus other things!). He just couldn't "tame" her natural instincts and crap just grew outof that. I think there are a few players on this team that are being "limited" in a similar way. But just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by beaveragain on Jan 23, 2024 16:32:28 GMT -8
I think Rueck is a great defensive coach and a very average offensive coach (at least at the Pac-12 level). It would be interesting to see what would happen if he stepped back and let an assistant both coach and run the offense like an OC in football. Although the halftime (into the 3rd) was all about arrogant Stanford (good reason on that particular day) both the commentators and guest were very positive toward OSU & Rueck. However, one snippet was meant as a positive and to me is not. I've thought the major issue with his teams from early on were "plays". The constant having to run a play... like he can't coach "freedom" and let chemistry and hoop IQ shine a bit. He wants to imprint himself on every possession. The playbook being "thick" and the comments that we'd never be able to remember all those sets really hit home. Sometimes you need to let athletes "athlete". To this day I'm still convinced that was the basis for the downfall of the coach/player relationship with Destiny (plus other things!). He just couldn't "tame" her natural instincts and crap just grew outof that. I think there are a few players on this team that are being "limited" in a similar way. But just my opinion. I'm curious, which one of the top 10 or so coaches in the country do you think don't run plays and just let the players do whatever they feel like?
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Jan 23, 2024 16:45:25 GMT -8
Although the halftime (into the 3rd) was all about arrogant Stanford (good reason on that particular day) both the commentators and guest were very positive toward OSU & Rueck. However, one snippet was meant as a positive and to me is not. I've thought the major issue with his teams from early on were "plays". The constant having to run a play... like he can't coach "freedom" and let chemistry and hoop IQ shine a bit. He wants to imprint himself on every possession. The playbook being "thick" and the comments that we'd never be able to remember all those sets really hit home. Sometimes you need to let athletes "athlete". To this day I'm still convinced that was the basis for the downfall of the coach/player relationship with Destiny (plus other things!). He just couldn't "tame" her natural instincts and crap just grew outof that. I think there are a few players on this team that are being "limited" in a similar way. But just my opinion. I'm curious, which one of the top 10 or so coaches in the country do you think don't run plays and just let the players do whatever they feel like? Is that what you got from that? Top 10 coaches don't run plays? Lol
|
|
|
Post by beaveragain on Jan 23, 2024 16:48:57 GMT -8
I'm curious, which one of the top 10 or so coaches in the country do you think don't run plays and just let the players do whatever they feel like? Is that what you got from that? Top 10 coaches don't run plays? Lol Yeah, I can't think of any either.
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Jan 23, 2024 17:15:52 GMT -8
I think Rueck is a great defensive coach and a very average offensive coach (at least at the Pac-12 level). It would be interesting to see what would happen if he stepped back and let an assistant both coach and run the offense like an OC in football. Although the halftime (into the 3rd) was all about arrogant Stanford (good reason on that particular day) both the commentators and guest were very positive toward OSU & Rueck. However, one snippet was meant as a positive and to me is not. I've thought the major issue with his teams from early on were "plays". The constant having to run a play... like he can't coach "freedom" and let chemistry and hoop IQ shine a bit. He wants to imprint himself on every possession. The playbook being "thick" and the comments that we'd never be able to remember all those sets really hit home. Sometimes you need to let athletes "athlete". To this day I'm still convinced that was the basis for the downfall of the coach/player relationship with Destiny (plus other things!). He just couldn't "tame" her natural instincts and crap just grew outof that. I think there are a few players on this team that are being "limited" in a similar way. But just my opinion. I don't disagree with you. Aleah Goodman was allowed to run the team w/o on court intervention with coach. Once Donovan & Kennedie are more experienced I really believe this will change as both are very cerebral and coach Rueck's confidence will grow in their ability to direct the offense as a coach on the floor. In the past few games there has been a lot of intervention on the part of coach while our PGs are operating with competitors in their grill.
|
|
|
Post by standerd on Jan 23, 2024 18:25:03 GMT -8
"In the past few games there has been a lot of intervention on the part of coach while our PGs are operating with competitors in their grill."
I noticed this too. IMO, it really disrupted the flow at the time and doesn't seem to be a real confidence builder. Tending to be a kind of over control. You coach 'em and let 'em play and see what happens. During a game, timeouts and other breaks are for coaching, rather than stopping the PG at mid-court for a conversation (as happened with Hunter in the Stanford game).
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Jan 23, 2024 18:36:14 GMT -8
Despite all of the interminable hype surrounding Tara V’s career wins record vs OSU, they still fell short of a sellout in their 7,400 seat gym. That’s hard for me to believe. Still beats a Cal home football game
|
|