|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Nov 28, 2023 18:42:42 GMT -8
It can't. Full faith and credit. Another state cannot appeal another state's Supreme Court's ruling on an issue, unless there is some kind of jurisdictional or procedural argument. That is why I thought that it should be brought in Benton or Whitman Counties originally. If the full Washington Supreme Court makes a ruling, the only appeal would be to the United States Supreme Court. If we lose at some point, there may be some kind of cross-appeal. I could see that, but if the United States Supreme Court rules on it, it cannot be relitigated. So going to the US Supreme Court could be years. So, they don't get their money from 2023-24. But we and WSU get Pac-12 money starting in 2024-25 and control up to $200m in assets, according to the UW president in their brief. We can hold out as long as they can. |
|
|
|
Post by sparty on Nov 28, 2023 19:08:52 GMT -8
So going to the US Supreme Court could be years. So, they don't get their money from 2023-24. But we and WSU get Pac-12 money starting in 2024-25 and control up to $200m in assets, according to the UW president in their brief. We can hold out as long as they can. I bet that Stanford and Whoregon could hold out the longest with their deep pocket donor(s). I wonder if the four corner schools would hold a grudge in letting us in the Big12 if we squeezed them by blocking any voting. I say screw them all. Do you think the 4 corner schools would block any future conference membership if it gets that ugly or would it never come to that? |
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Nov 28, 2023 19:49:31 GMT -8
My bet is that the Supreme Court of the United States wouldn't even bother with this case. they would refuse to hear it. why waste their time on college football and they have more important things to worry about.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 28, 2023 20:35:46 GMT -8
My bet is that the Supreme Court of the United States wouldn't even bother with this case. they would refuse to hear it. why waste their time on college football and they have more important things to worry about. They were not too busy to decide NCAA v. Alston (the NIL case) two years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Nov 28, 2023 22:29:44 GMT -8
My bet is that the Supreme Court of the United States wouldn't even bother with this case. they would refuse to hear it. why waste their time on college football and they have more important things to worry about. They were not too busy to decide NCAA v. Alston (the NIL case) two years ago. Although this is more regional, while the NIL was national in scope and rights of individual athletes involved. |
|
|
|
Post by atownbeaver on Nov 29, 2023 10:20:21 GMT -8
My bet is that the Supreme Court of the United States wouldn't even bother with this case. they would refuse to hear it. why waste their time on college football and they have more important things to worry about. They were not too busy to decide NCAA v. Alston (the NIL case) two years ago. The scope of that is much larger and wide reaching than 12 teams beefing over the carcass of a conference. |
|
