|
|
Post by grayman on Nov 17, 2023 18:50:36 GMT -8
Canzano has reported that OSU and WSU filed a motion with the Supreme Court to expedite the schedule and the court granted the motion.
"The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by p8nted on Nov 17, 2023 21:49:36 GMT -8
that is good news. This needs to be clarified quickly
|
|
|
|
Post by mbabeav on Nov 18, 2023 8:47:13 GMT -8
Canzano has reported that OSU and WSU filed a motion with the Supreme Court to expedite the schedule and the court granted the motion. "The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4. wow, that is light speed for a Supreme court decision |
|
|
|
Post by atownbeaver on Nov 18, 2023 9:44:31 GMT -8
Canzano has reported that OSU and WSU filed a motion with the Supreme Court to expedite the schedule and the court granted the motion. "The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4. It is important, obviously to move on to more substantial planning, and use of the funds. But given how much talk we have seen about scheduling arrangements etc, I am not sure time is our enemy as much as we think it is. OSU/WSU are fully, 100% committed to being independent next year. We will not be in a conference next year. at all. period. We are going to build and have a schedule completely free of any court ruling or decision making, and we intent to use our full grace period to remake the conference. Nothing that happens in this court room will change that. It will obviously impact some details, but it won't change the plan. We have told our players as much, we have told recruits as much and we have assured them we will play a good schedule and I think that is true. We are not under the gun to get a conference by next year. we already threw that out. What we are under the gun with for next year is the ability to salvage TV arrangements from the Pac-12 network. We can't necessarily count on riding the coat tails of every team that schedules with us on TV, particularly the MWC (though one would think CBS would preference all the WSU/OSU match ups). |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Nov 18, 2023 9:48:23 GMT -8
Canzano has reported that OSU and WSU filed a motion with the Supreme Court to expedite the schedule and the court granted the motion. "The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4. It is important, obviously to move on to more substantial planning, and use of the funds. But given how much talk we have seen about scheduling arrangements etc, I am not sure time is our enemy as much as we think it is. OSU/WSU are fully, 100% committed to being independent next year. We will not be in a conference next year. at all. period. We are going to build and have a schedule completely free of any court ruling or decision making, and we intent to use our full grace period to remake the conference. Nothing that happens in this court room will change that. It will obviously impact some details, but it won't change the plan. We have told our players as much, we have told recruits as much and we have assured them we will play a good schedule and I think that is true. We are not under the gun to get a conference by next year. we already threw that out. What we are under the gun with for next year is the ability to salvage TV arrangements from the Pac-12 network. We can't necessarily count on riding the coat tails of every team that schedules with us on TV, particularly the MWC (though one would think CBS would preference all the WSU/OSU match ups). We are in a conference next year. Just with only 2 teams. If we were independent and the conference dissolved, we would have to split the money with the departing teams. It’s just a very unusual “conference” |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Nov 18, 2023 10:57:29 GMT -8
It is important, obviously to move on to more substantial planning, and use of the funds. But given how much talk we have seen about scheduling arrangements etc, I am not sure time is our enemy as much as we think it is. OSU/WSU are fully, 100% committed to being independent next year. We will not be in a conference next year. at all. period. We are going to build and have a schedule completely free of any court ruling or decision making, and we intent to use our full grace period to remake the conference. Nothing that happens in this court room will change that. It will obviously impact some details, but it won't change the plan. We have told our players as much, we have told recruits as much and we have assured them we will play a good schedule and I think that is true. We are not under the gun to get a conference by next year. we already threw that out. What we are under the gun with for next year is the ability to salvage TV arrangements from the Pac-12 network. We can't necessarily count on riding the coat tails of every team that schedules with us on TV, particularly the MWC (though one would think CBS would preference all the WSU/OSU match ups). We are in a conference next year. Just with only 2 teams. If we were independent and the conference dissolved, we would have to split the money with the departing teams. It’s just a very unusual “conference” In theory, if the plan is to take only a few of the MWC teams and the MWC knows it and works in a penalty into the scheduling agreement for the next couple years, it could get interesting. The AAC scheduled muli-year exit fees for a few teams that already left. In theory, if Tulane or other AAC teams wanted to come in and could get the same multi-year exit fee deal, the only reason to wait would be a media deal with the new Pac Whatever. If the Pac 2 works out a decent media deal for the next 2 years, with an agreement to extend the same money to teams that join... in theory (once again) we could be seeing additions from other conferences earlier that 2 years out. Not likely, but possible. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 18, 2023 13:03:38 GMT -8
We are in a conference next year. Just with only 2 teams. If we were independent and the conference dissolved, we would have to split the money with the departing teams. It’s just a very unusual “conference” In theory, if the plan is to take only a few of the MWC teams and the MWC knows it and works in a penalty into the scheduling agreement for the next couple years, it could get interesting. The AAC scheduled muli-year exit fees for a few teams that already left. In theory, if Tulane or other AAC teams wanted to come in and could get the same multi-year exit fee deal, the only reason to wait would be a media deal with the new Pac Whatever. If the Pac 2 works out a decent media deal for the next 2 years, with an agreement to extend the same money to teams that join... in theory (once again) we could be seeing additions from other conferences earlier that 2 years out. Not likely, but possible. The AAC exit window is sometime in April, too. You can send invites before that they can accept, but you have time, if your plan is to add AAC teams. |
|
Mike84
Sophomore
Posts: 1,079 
Member is Online
|
Post by Mike84 on Nov 21, 2023 16:56:12 GMT -8
Referring back to the win in court last week, as reported in the media:
"But Libey stayed his ruling until the end of the week as the defendant, Washington (acting on behalf of all 10 departing members), seeks an appeal from the Washington Supreme Court in Olympia."
So, the "until the end of the week" no longer applies? Nothing was to be decided yesterday or today? Have we moved on to the Supreme Court already and the new timeline is "The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4."?
We'll get a ruling on this phase of things on the same day that the portal opens for football, Dec. 4th?
|
|
|
|
Post by grayman on Nov 21, 2023 17:21:01 GMT -8
Referring back to the win in court last week, as reported in the media: "But Libey stayed his ruling until the end of the week as the defendant, Washington (acting on behalf of all 10 departing members), seeks an appeal from the Washington Supreme Court in Olympia." So, the "until the end of the week" no longer applies? Nothing was to be decided yesterday or today? Have we moved on to the Supreme Court already and the new timeline is "The answer to the emergency motion to stay should be served and filed by November 17th." Any reply by Nov. 22. Ruling by Dec. 4."? We'll get a ruling on this phase of things on the same day that the portal opens for football, Dec. 4th? Until the end of the week was moved to that Monday. But that's not relevant now. All I've seen reported is the dates you just posted. And the ruling is supposed to be made by Dec. 4, which to me indicates that it will get done before (or possibly on) that date. |
|
ftd
Junior
"I think real leaders show up when times are hard." Trent Bray 11/29/2023
Posts: 2,517
|
Post by ftd on Nov 22, 2023 10:35:20 GMT -8
So today is the 22nd..Do we expect some sort of announcement from the court?
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 22, 2023 15:01:23 GMT -8
So today is the 22nd..Do we expect some sort of announcement from the court? No. You can check the docket today. But it might not update until Monday. |
|
