|
|
Post by fishwrapper on Oct 20, 2023 17:57:36 GMT -8
I am associated with the university, and I am also associated with this board, so by the associative property both the university and this forum are associated through me - and I know I am not the only one, as there are many links in that chain.
TheGlove is right, rgeorge is wrong, and I'm in need of a fresh cuppa.
|
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Oct 20, 2023 18:32:00 GMT -8
I am associated with the university, and I am also associated with this board, so by the associative property both the university and this forum are associated through me - and I know I am not the only one, as there are many links in that chain. TheGlove is right, rgeorge is wrong, and I'm in need of a fresh cuppa. Your illustration is far more the "transitive" property. And, "about" is not "associated with'. Although, "chance association" is spot on... random/fake. But you do you... |
|
|
|
Post by EmeraldEmpire on Oct 20, 2023 18:51:20 GMT -8
I thought it was a band from the late 60's. Who's peaking out from under the stairway Classic performance from said band circa 1967  : |
|
|
|
Post by fishwrapper on Oct 21, 2023 13:41:29 GMT -8
I am associated with the university, and I am also associated with this board, so by the associative property both the university and this forum are associated through me - and I know I am not the only one, as there are many links in that chain. TheGlove is right, rgeorge is wrong, and I'm in need of a fresh cuppa. Your illustration is far more the "transitive" property. And, "about" is not "associated with'. Although, "chance association" is spot on... random/fake. But you do you... Ah, I see the trouble: you are referring to the mathematical properties. If this were a math problem, you would not be incorrect. This is a social sciences question, however, and the associative property of associations has been quite clear for some time. According to the International Organization of Amalgamated Associations, this type of overlap is and has been referred to as an an "associative propert[y]." From the charter document of the IOAA, I quote: TheGlove remains in the column representing “correct” and, once again, I need another cuppa. [1] International Organization of Amalgamated Associations (IOAA) Charter, Journal of the IOAA, vol. 1, issue 1, p.4, 2 December 1897; Dublin, Ireland. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Oct 21, 2023 14:10:28 GMT -8
Your illustration is far more the "transitive" property. And, "about" is not "associated with'. Although, "chance association" is spot on... random/fake. But you do you... Ah, I see the trouble: you are referring to the mathematical properties. If this were a math problem, you would not be incorrect. This is a social sciences question, however, and the associative property of associations has been quite clear for some time. According to the International Organization of Amalgamated Associations, this type of overlap is and has been referred to as an an "associative propert[y]." From the charter document of the IOAA, I quote: TheGlove remains in the column representing “correct” and, once again, I need another cuppa. [1] International Organization of Amalgamated Associations (IOAA) Charter, Journal of the IOAA, vol. 1, issue 1, p.4, 2 December 1897; Dublin, Ireland. Adda little "gaslight" to that cuppa. |
|
|
|
Post by fishwrapper on Oct 21, 2023 16:56:11 GMT -8
What other games are there to enjoy on a bye week...?
|
|
: