|
|
Post by abureid on Sept 18, 2023 20:29:37 GMT -8
I think OSU should agree to a 2024 CW with the following stipulations.
1) home and home required
2) ucks pay 7figures
3) we schedule the week after ucks play an away game at either of tOSU, UM, PSU and never in the first half of the season.
without that, they can suck eggs. Loser ass traitors
|
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Sept 18, 2023 21:47:54 GMT -8
The Beavs would have to get the first home game for this to ever occur, the dux have proven themselves to be untrustworthy negotiators (agreeing to the Apple GOR deal Thursday night, then not showing Friday morning).
Odds are the ucks would not agree to pay more to the Beavs to play in the landfill than the Beavs pay them to play in Reser.
I think a home and home with them is a long way off. Maybe after they finish somewhere between 3rd and 8th in their new conference 4-6 years in a row they'll get off their high horse.
|
|
|
|
Post by sparty on Sept 19, 2023 5:53:39 GMT -8
I think OSU should agree to a 2024 CW with the following stipulations. 1) home and home required 2) ucks pay 7figures 3) we schedule the week after ucks play an away game at either of tOSU, UM, PSU and never in the first half of the season. without that, they can suck eggs. Loser ass traitors Who cares about the civil war other than to outright call it the civil war. We are not in a negotiating position because they don't need us. They will just schedule one of the other Big12 school that were ex pac opponents. The civil war has about as much meaning as scheduling Portland State at this point.
Some of us think the civil war is needed, Meh!
|
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Sept 19, 2023 5:55:42 GMT -8
The Beavs would have to get the first home game for this to ever occur, the dux have proven themselves to be untrustworthy negotiators (agreeing to the Apple GOR deal Thursday night, then not showing Friday morning). Odds are the ucks would not agree to pay more to the Beavs to play in the landfill than the Beavs pay them to play in Reser. I think a home and home with them is a long way off. Maybe after they finish somewhere between 3rd and 8th in their new conference 4-6 years in a row they'll get off their high horse. The visiting team does not pay the home team to play in their stadium. The ucks would never pay us to play here. |
|
|
|
Post by korculabeav on Sept 19, 2023 6:30:24 GMT -8
CW is a yes simply if a home and home is agreed too (fine with no $)
CW is a no if all at hole (even with $)
|
|
|
|
Post by beaverdude on Sept 19, 2023 6:39:58 GMT -8
We should NEVER play those traitors outside of Reser. Ever!
|
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Sept 19, 2023 6:48:47 GMT -8
We should NEVER play those traitors outside of Reser. Ever! Close. We should NEVER play those traitors. The Civil War is dead to me just as the Apple Cup is. Ducks haven’t cared about the rivalry for so long that we look like clinging, desperate exes hoping to be taken back. f%#* them and f%#* their asshole fans. (French wine talking again.) |
|
|
|
Post by larbeav on Sept 19, 2023 10:03:59 GMT -8
I think OSU should agree to a 2024 CW with the following stipulations. 1) home and home required 2) ucks pay 7figures 3) we schedule the week after ucks play an away game at either of tOSU, UM, PSU and never in the first half of the season. without that, they can suck eggs. Loser ass traitors [br Will the beavers have to pay "7" figures if the Ducks play in Corvallis? |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Sept 19, 2023 10:17:58 GMT -8
I think OSU should agree to a 2024 CW with the following stipulations. 1) home and home required 2) ucks pay 7figures 3) we schedule the week after ucks play an away game at either of tOSU, UM, PSU and never in the first half of the season. without that, they can suck eggs. Loser ass traitors [br Will the beavers have to pay "7" figures if the Ducks play in Corvallis? It would not be "7", but it would be the standard upper crust P5 rate, minus the travel per diem as they do not have to fly, or even stay in town the night before. But, the ucks aren't playing a NC game for free or for the standard lower tier NC fee. They can schedule anyone and make millions at home. So yes, OSU would be paying out part of their game revenues to the ucks. And, because their previous actions show little respect for loyalty let alone tradition, why would they now do OSU any favors. Without Phil kicking in big $, they will be running a AD deficit for the first few years in the B10. Oregon can't afford to not make money on every NC game. As for the CW... WTFC! Really? It is now a meaningless NC game, and my bet is would not sell out in Reser except for 1000's of uck fans buying up secondary tix. Once that game became our symbol of the Pac12 breakup and traditions becoming meaningless, almost all fans I'm closely or remotely associated with could care less about the game other than winning the final version. |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Sept 19, 2023 10:25:27 GMT -8
The Beavs would have to get the first home game for this to ever occur, the dux have proven themselves to be untrustworthy negotiators (agreeing to the Apple GOR deal Thursday night, then not showing Friday morning). Odds are the ucks would not agree to pay more to the Beavs to play in the landfill than the Beavs pay them to play in Reser. I think a home and home with them is a long way off. Maybe after they finish somewhere between 3rd and 8th in their new conference 4-6 years in a row they'll get off their high horse. The visiting team does not pay the home team to play in their stadium. The ucks would never pay us to play here. He was using a home and home required scenario. That would not fly for the ucks unless we paid them a ton. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Sept 19, 2023 11:54:43 GMT -8
For us and Oregon, since expensive charter planes would not be needed, each home team pays the other $100,000 k for expenses (busses, post-game food and pre-game hotel) and keeps all other revenues. The money may vary, but that's how many home-and-home contracts are structured.
Pac-12 has a minimum that must be paid (it used to be $180,000), up to a maximum (it used to be about $400,000k), depending on attendance.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Sept 19, 2023 12:14:17 GMT -8
The visiting team does not pay the home team to play in their stadium. The ucks would never pay us to play here. He was using a home and home required scenario. That would not fly for the ucks unless we paid them a ton. It would, Oregon has a larger and better stadium. They would make more money on their side of the home-and-home, regardless of what the agreed-to road payment would be. The guaranteed contracts are nice, but they should do what soccer does and agree to a percentage of gate at each stadium. 50/50 split at each. Each team makes bank on each game. That way, Oregon will not be profiting more on the game than Oregon State. |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Sept 19, 2023 17:27:47 GMT -8
He was using a home and home required scenario. That would not fly for the ucks unless we paid them a ton. It would, Oregon has a larger and better stadium. They would make more money on their side of the home-and-home, regardless of what the agreed-to road payment would be. The guaranteed contracts are nice, but they should do what soccer does and agree to a percentage of gate at each stadium. 50/50 split at each. Each team makes bank on each game. That way, Oregon will not be profiting more on the game than Oregon State. The split gate receipts is a novel idea, it's fair, I'd highly doubt uo would do that for football. Thought I'd read somewhere years ago we pay each other the same price to visit. If so, uo has been taking in lots more than OSU for home Civil War games for years. I doubt they'd ever want to change that. |
|
