|
|
Post by hottubbeaver on May 15, 2023 10:19:10 GMT -8
So what's the deal for the teams who didn't play their full conference schedule. I assume those games won't be made up but don't know that.
.
Beavers are 18-12,(30 games) .600%
Should UW go 2-1 this week they'll finish with an 18-11 (29) and .621 win %. The only played two vs ASU and split.
ASU plays UCLA this weekend. A sweep gives ASU a 17-12 record (29) and .586%
It's only relevant to second place standings at this point. Since standings are based on win%, playing even one fewer game makes a difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on May 15, 2023 14:38:25 GMT -8
So what's the deal for the teams who didn't play their full conference schedule. I assume those games won't be made up but don't know that. . Beavers are 18-12,(30 games) .600% Should UW go 2-1 this week they'll finish with an 18-11 (29) and .621 win %. The only played two vs ASU and split. ASU plays UCLA this weekend. A sweep gives ASU a 17-12 record (29) and .586% It's only relevant to second place standings at this point. Since standings are based on win%, playing even one fewer game makes a difference. It was thought out as a possibility and is in the SOP. Can't punish teams for unplayable conditions. Go 19-11, solved. |
|
|
|
Post by hottubbeaver on May 16, 2023 11:55:19 GMT -8
So what's the deal for the teams who didn't play their full conference schedule. I assume those games won't be made up but don't know that. . Beavers are 18-12,(30 games) .600% Should UW go 2-1 this week they'll finish with an 18-11 (29) and .621 win %. The only played two vs ASU and split. ASU plays UCLA this weekend. A sweep gives ASU a 17-12 record (29) and .586% It's only relevant to second place standings at this point. Since standings are based on win%, playing even one fewer game makes a difference. It was thought out as a possibility and is in the SOP. Can't punish teams for unplayable conditions. Go 19-11, solved. The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on May 16, 2023 12:05:09 GMT -8
It was thought out as a possibility and is in the SOP. Can't punish teams for unplayable conditions. Go 19-11, solved. The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? There is no "punishment"! Lol So if OSU goes 19-11 are they advantaged because the weather cooperated if UW missed one game and goes 18-11 or is UW punished? Winning % is winning %. Unless there is a large disparity in total games played it is completely fair. AND, was known factor. Same as ties... no advantages or punishment... just circumstance that was accounted for with winning %. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on May 16, 2023 12:37:04 GMT -8
The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? There is no "punishment"! Lol So if OSU goes 19-11 are they advantaged because the weather cooperated if UW missed one game and goes 18-11 or is UW punished? Winning % is winning %. Unless there is a large disparity in total games played it is completely fair. AND, was known factor. Same as ties... no advantages or punishment... just circumstance that was accounted for with winning %. Wait, we're being punished for losing one more game than them?..........what? Is that some sort of Jedi mind trick? |
|
|
|
Post by beaverdreams on May 16, 2023 13:48:33 GMT -8
It was thought out as a possibility and is in the SOP. Can't punish teams for unplayable conditions. Go 19-11, solved. The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? Hottubbeaver...it is a valid point you're making, mathematically. Hopefully it doesn't become a factor though. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on May 16, 2023 14:42:41 GMT -8
The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? Hottubbeaver...it is a valid point you're making, mathematically. Hopefully it doesn't become a factor though. Winning % is "mathematical". Being "punished" is not. Teams didn't plan or have the choice to play less games. |
|
|
|
Post by hottubbeaver on May 16, 2023 15:07:14 GMT -8
The part in bold is fine, but it doesn't end there because they are actually being rewarded for playing less games. Answer this, why should a team who did play all there conference games be punished in favor of teams who didn't? Hottubbeaver...it is a valid point you're making, mathematically. Hopefully it doesn't become a factor though. Where I could see it being an issue is in the conference tournament seedings and agree, I hope it plays out in final weekend in a way that doesn't occur. . |
|
