Post by gnawitall on Apr 17, 2023 6:17:14 GMT -8
In a recent post I wondered about the one run losses in Berg's tenure and believed it to be a lot. Here's what I found;
Through last weekend the overall record is 62-57.
Non-conference, including tournament is 37-28.
Pac 12(9) is 25-29.
I thought Pac would be much worse but experienced a new colloquialism? called recency bias. In last year's march to the WCWS the team lost eight! one run games in the Pac. Six in a row to Washington and UCLA.
The research helped dispel my angst :-)
Berg tenure one run loss record against the conference;
Arizona 4-1 very surprised
ASU 6-3 "
UCLA 1-5 Not surprised
Cal 4-3
Stan 5-3
Wash 2-9 These loses stuck in my mind
1-4
Utah 3-2
Through last weekend the overall record is 62-57.
Non-conference, including tournament is 37-28.
Pac 12(9) is 25-29.
I thought Pac would be much worse but experienced a new colloquialism? called recency bias. In last year's march to the WCWS the team lost eight! one run games in the Pac. Six in a row to Washington and UCLA.
The research helped dispel my angst :-)
Berg tenure one run loss record against the conference;
Arizona 4-1 very surprised
ASU 6-3 "
UCLA 1-5 Not surprised
Cal 4-3
Stan 5-3
Wash 2-9 These loses stuck in my mind
1-4
Utah 3-2
