Apple+?

That one gave me a chuckle, too!

Interesting, though.

I have read a lot of articles and watched a lot of youtube videos regarding the Pac 10 media rights. It seems to fall into two camps: most of the national media, including a lot of Pac affiliated people on the west coast, say that the Pac 12 is doomed. UW and uo will head to the Big 10 at a bargain price and that will trigger the four corner schools to bolt shortly thereafter. Or, the four corner schools are already fed up with Kliavkoff and are gone very, very soon, no matter what uo and UW do. 

Then there is Canzano, Wilner, and Michelle Bodkin, whom I just heard of today when I saw her article regarding Pac media rights. Those three write that the Pac 10 is closing on a deal but the details are complicated. They expect the Pac to sign for a deal similar to what the Big 12 got. 

Here's the interesting part: Out of all the articles I have read and youtube videos I have seen on the subject, no matter the writer's belief in the Pac 12's fate, direct sources are rarely quoted (and I wouldn't expect them to be). It is almost always "sources in the industry" or "sources within the [Pac 12/Big 12]." It is so rare to actually see a name directly involved in the process quoted. I can think of only four: 1) The Pac 12 Presidents putting out the unity statement, 2) the CEO of Scripps Sports (Ion TV) who said that Scripps and the Pac 12 would not be entering into an agreement, 3) Utah AD Mark Harlan's  tweet that you just quoted, and 4) Harlan's tweet some months ago that said, "We're not leaving!" in response to another article about the death of the Pac. 

Since direct quotes are so rare they are treasured. Especially when they are as succinct and to the point as Harlan's!