|
|
Post by orangethunder on Nov 28, 2022 11:42:00 GMT -8
Discuss
|
|
|
|
Post by beavs6 on Nov 28, 2022 13:42:07 GMT -8
Discuss why...
I'm guessing not many people on this board really care.
Oh, and if they(uo) have a "bad" DC or OC...shouldn't everyone here hope they keep the status quo?
Dude(dudette?)...you a troll? Why start a thread like this? Serious question.
|
|
mb
Freshman
Posts: 394 
|
Post by mb on Nov 28, 2022 14:24:59 GMT -8
Wasn't Lanning the best D coordinator in the SEC last year? Seems a little oversight along the way would've been warranted. MB. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Nov 28, 2022 14:27:38 GMT -8
Wasn't Lanning the best D coordinator in the SEC last year? Seems a little oversight along the way would've been warranted. MB. They held us to 328 total yards. Their DC was not the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Nov 28, 2022 14:38:23 GMT -8
Wasn't Lanning the best D coordinator in the SEC last year? Seems a little oversight along the way would've been warranted. MB. They held us to 328 total yards. Their DC was not the problem. We averaged 5.9 yards per play; without the three kneeldowns we are probably over 6 ypp. Part of the reason for (misleading) low 328 total yards was field position. Our last three drives started at the UO 36, 2 and 28-yard lines. We didn't have much field to cover to compile yards. Their DC definitely had a problem coming up with a scheme that could stop us, even though we totally abandoned the pass in the final 23 minutes. The late third/early fourth quarters reminded me of the 2016 game, when we simply quit passing and overran their defense with Nall and Pierce and a timely run or two from McMaryion. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Nov 28, 2022 14:43:55 GMT -8
They held us to 328 total yards. Their DC was not the problem. We averaged 5.9 yards per play; without the three kneeldowns we are probably over 6 ypp. Part of the reason for (misleading) low 328 total yards was field position. Our last three drives started at the UO 36, 2 and 28-yard lines. We didn't have much field to cover to compile yards. Their DC definitely had a problem coming up with a scheme that could stop us, even though we totally abandoned the pass in the final 23 minutes. The late third/early fourth quarters reminded me of the 2016 game, when we simply quit passing and overran their defense with Nall and Pierce and a timely run or two from McMaryion. You have no way of knowing if we would have piled up more yards if we had worse field position. My point was that their defense played well enough to win. The 4th down decisions and special teams issues were why they lost the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Nov 28, 2022 15:02:19 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 28, 2022 16:04:13 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 28, 2022 17:15:38 GMT -8
268 yards on 43 carries and five touchdowns. But four carries were Oregon State lining up in victory formation and taking a 1-2 yard loss. Take those out. 274 yards on 39 carries. 7.03 ypc. Oregon State had the most ypc this year against Oregon I will say that I don't understand Oregon's defense. They run a base nickel, but can't seem to stop the run. Why not bring in another linebacker? I don't get it. The Beavers had a very impressive show against a very good all-around defense. And three forced turnovers in the passing game speak to that. But they can't stop the run, which is humorous. It's like watching teams go up against GAG. It's great to be on the team with a run game rather than being on the other side five years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Nov 28, 2022 17:20:15 GMT -8
We averaged 5.9 yards per play; without the three kneeldowns we are probably over 6 ypp. Part of the reason for (misleading) low 328 total yards was field position. Our last three drives started at the UO 36, 2 and 28-yard lines. We didn't have much field to cover to compile yards. Their DC definitely had a problem coming up with a scheme that could stop us, even though we totally abandoned the pass in the final 23 minutes. The late third/early fourth quarters reminded me of the 2016 game, when we simply quit passing and overran their defense with Nall and Pierce and a timely run or two from McMaryion. You have no way of knowing if we would have piled up more yards if we had worse field position. My point was that their defense played well enough to win. The 4th down decisions and special teams issues were why they lost the game. It’s a good question. But Oregon had no way to stop our run game after we decided to just run the ball. That’s a big problem. They knew it was coming and we took it to them. But until that game Oregon had decent numbers on defense, especially against the run. Probably no reason to fire the DC, but he needs to figure it out. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Nov 28, 2022 17:23:14 GMT -8
You have no way of knowing if we would have piled up more yards if we had worse field position. My point was that their defense played well enough to win. The 4th down decisions and special teams issues were why they lost the game. It’s a good question. But Oregon had no way to stop our run game after we decided to just run the ball. That’s a big problem. They knew it was coming and we took it to them. But until that game Oregon had decent numbers on defense, especially against the run. Probably no reason to fire the DC, but he needs to figure it out. Yeah, I want the Ducks to keep their remaining coaching staff together for years to come, especially on defense. Bring it on! |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Nov 28, 2022 17:34:15 GMT -8
We averaged 5.9 yards per play; without the three kneeldowns we are probably over 6 ypp. Part of the reason for (misleading) low 328 total yards was field position. Our last three drives started at the UO 36, 2 and 28-yard lines. We didn't have much field to cover to compile yards. Their DC definitely had a problem coming up with a scheme that could stop us, even though we totally abandoned the pass in the final 23 minutes. The late third/early fourth quarters reminded me of the 2016 game, when we simply quit passing and overran their defense with Nall and Pierce and a timely run or two from McMaryion. You have no way of knowing if we would have piled up more yards if we had worse field position. My point was that their defense played well enough to win. The 4th down decisions and special teams issues were why they lost the game. I totally understood your point. But the low yardage total, in more than a small part, is attributable to the short fields we had. I have no problem assuming we would have ran the ball as well as we did had drives started 20 or 30 yards back. They had ample opportunity to show they could stop us, and they never did. |
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Nov 28, 2022 21:07:50 GMT -8
It’s a good question. But Oregon had no way to stop our run game after we decided to just run the ball. That’s a big problem. They knew it was coming and we took it to them. But until that game Oregon had decent numbers on defense, especially against the run. Probably no reason to fire the DC, but he needs to figure it out. Yeah, I want the Ducks to keep their remaining coaching staff together for years to come, especially on defense. Bring it on! I don’t know. I’ve enjoyed the revolving door of coaches. Tough to build continuity. |
|
