|
|
Post by ag87 on Sept 10, 2022 20:28:11 GMT -8
I didn't know that could happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Sept 10, 2022 21:01:37 GMT -8
I think they scored first, then got a pick six.
|
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Sept 10, 2022 23:34:34 GMT -8
Wacky!
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 18, 2022 15:17:16 GMT -8
I think they scored first, then got a pick six. guys wanna play and score..but you scored, got a pick...take a knee and end it..No sense rubbing it in Tell that to Kenny Wheaton. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Sept 18, 2022 17:41:19 GMT -8
guys wanna play and score..but you scored, got a pick...take a knee and end it..No sense rubbing it in Tell that to Kenny Wheaton. Not the same situation. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Sept 18, 2022 19:55:52 GMT -8
Sometimes it's better not to score.
Browns game today. They are up 24-17 with under two minutes, Jets are out of TOs. A guy scores with 1:51 to play to make it 30-17. If he sits down at the 5 instead, it's first down, and the Browns can victory formation the game out.
But he scores to make it 30-17 (they miss the PAT). Somehow they get burned on a long pass for a TD with about 1:20 left to make it 30-24. Jets recover the onside kick, then score to win the game with the PAT.
We almost got burned in 2000 at the Rose Bowl, same situation. If Pat McCall just sits at the 20, we simply run out the clock. Instead he scores, UCLA scores, then gets the onside and gets to our 35 or so before the game ends.
Same with the Civil War at Eugene in 2011 or 2013. Down by a point, Bolden scores instead of going down when we could have bled the clock to nothing and kicked a FG with under 20 seconds left. Yeah, you could miss the FG, but after he scored I had o doubt Mariotta was gonna lead them to a game-winning TD, which he did.
PS: Isn't the game over the minute the ball is intercepted? Each team gets one OT possession. Team B's possession ended when the ball was intercepted, no matter what transpires afterward.
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 18, 2022 22:22:15 GMT -8
Sometimes it's better not to score. Browns game today. They are up 24-17 with under two minutes, Jets are out of TOs. A guy scores with 1:51 to play to make it 30-17. If he sits down at the 5 instead, it's first down, and the Browns can victory formation the game out. But he scores to make it 30-17 (they miss the PAT). Somehow they get burned on a long pass for a TD with about 1:20 left to make it 30-24. Jets recover the onside kick, then score to win the game with the PAT. We almost got burned in 2000 at the Rose Bowl, same situation. If Pat McCall just sits at the 20, we simply run out the clock. Instead he scores, UCLA scores, then gets the onside and gets to our 35 or so before the game ends. Same with the Civil War at Eugene in 2011 or 2013. Down by a point, Bolden scores instead of going down when we could have bled the clock to nothing and kicked a FG with under 20 seconds left. Yeah, you could miss the FG, but after he scored I had o doubt Mariotta was gonna lead them to a game-winning TD, which he did. PS: Isn't the game over the minute the ball is intercepted? Each team gets one OT possession. Team B's possession ended when the ball was intercepted, no matter what transpires afterward. It’s still a live ball until he: 1. Downs the ball. 2. Is tackled. 3. Goes out of bounds. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Sept 19, 2022 10:34:47 GMT -8
Sometimes it's better not to score. Browns game today. They are up 24-17 with under two minutes, Jets are out of TOs. A guy scores with 1:51 to play to make it 30-17. If he sits down at the 5 instead, it's first down, and the Browns can victory formation the game out. But he scores to make it 30-17 (they miss the PAT). Somehow they get burned on a long pass for a TD with about 1:20 left to make it 30-24. Jets recover the onside kick, then score to win the game with the PAT. We almost got burned in 2000 at the Rose Bowl, same situation. If Pat McCall just sits at the 20, we simply run out the clock. Instead he scores, UCLA scores, then gets the onside and gets to our 35 or so before the game ends. Same with the Civil War at Eugene in 2011 or 2013. Down by a point, Bolden scores instead of going down when we could have bled the clock to nothing and kicked a FG with under 20 seconds left. Yeah, you could miss the FG, but after he scored I had o doubt Mariotta was gonna lead them to a game-winning TD, which he did. PS: Isn't the game over the minute the ball is intercepted? Each team gets one OT possession. Team B's possession ended when the ball was intercepted, no matter what transpires afterward. It’s still a live ball until he: 1. Downs the ball. 2. Is tackled. 3. Goes out of bounds. I know that. But according to the official's instructions, the game should be over the second the ball is intercepted, because that ends the offensive possession. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 19, 2022 10:50:29 GMT -8
It’s still a live ball until he: 1. Downs the ball. 2. Is tackled. 3. Goes out of bounds. I know that. But according to the official's instructions, the game should be over the second the ball is intercepted, because that ends the offensive possession. Then that would seem to mean that no defensive TD could be scored, if the overtime period is over at the moment of the interception. That does seem odd. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Sept 19, 2022 11:30:48 GMT -8
I know that. But according to the official's instructions, the game should be over the second the ball is intercepted, because that ends the offensive possession. Then that would seem to mean that no defensive TD could be scored, if the overtime period is over at the moment of the interception. That does seem odd. Well here is the rule: "Overtime periods consist, through the first two if necessary, of a two-possession series with each team getting one possession on offense and one on defense."By rule, the game should be over immediately if Team A scores in its possession to start the OT, and then intercepts or recovers a fumble, ending Team B's offensive possession. Team B's defensive and offensive possession req uirement would have been fulfilled, and Team A would be starting its 2nd possession the instant it intercepts or recovers a fumble, and Team B's offense would be starting its 2nd possession if it recovered a fumble on the interception/fumble return.
Now, I know it doesn't work that way. But by rule, it should. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Sept 19, 2022 12:46:55 GMT -8
Then that would seem to mean that no defensive TD could be scored, if the overtime period is over at the moment of the interception. That does seem odd. Well here is the rule: "Overtime periods consist, through the first two if necessary, of a two-possession series with each team getting one possession on offense and one on defense."By rule, the game should be over immediately if Team A scores in its possession to start the OT, and then intercepts or recovers a fumble, ending Team B's offensive possession. Team B's defensive and offensive possession req uirement would have been fulfilled, and Team A would be starting its 2nd possession the instant it intercepts or recovers a fumble, and Team B's offense would be starting its 2nd possession if it recovered a fumble on the interception/fumble return.
Now, I know it doesn't work that way. But by rule, it should. The play has to conclude. That is why they were allowed to score. They are not going to blow the play dead during the middle of it. It is a safety issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 19, 2022 14:01:38 GMT -8
Well here is the rule: "Overtime periods consist, through the first two if necessary, of a two-possession series with each team getting one possession on offense and one on defense."By rule, the game should be over immediately if Team A scores in its possession to start the OT, and then intercepts or recovers a fumble, ending Team B's offensive possession. Team B's defensive and offensive possession req uirement would have been fulfilled, and Team A would be starting its 2nd possession the instant it intercepts or recovers a fumble, and Team B's offense would be starting its 2nd possession if it recovered a fumble on the interception/fumble return.
Now, I know it doesn't work that way. But by rule, it should. The play has to conclude. That is why they were allowed to score. They are not going to blow the play dead during the middle of it. It is a safety issue. I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but from my simple-minded POV it seems like either the game is over or it’s not over. |
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Sept 19, 2022 14:05:45 GMT -8
The play has to conclude. That is why they were allowed to score. They are not going to blow the play dead during the middle of it. It is a safety issue. I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but from my simple-minded POV it seems like either the game is over or it’s not over. It's over when the play is over. They do not want to blow the whistle mid-play and have some people stop and some keep going because they don't hear the whistle. It becomes a safety issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Sept 19, 2022 14:45:43 GMT -8
I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but from my simple-minded POV it seems like either the game is over or it’s not over. It's over when the play is over. They do not want to blow the whistle mid-play and have some people stop and some keep going because they don't hear the whistle. It becomes a safety issue. OK. So what was the question anyway? |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Sept 19, 2022 17:38:50 GMT -8
The play has to conclude. That is why they were allowed to score. They are not going to blow the play dead during the middle of it. It is a safety issue. I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but from my simple-minded POV it seems like either the game is over or it’s not over.  |
|
