|
Post by beaveragain on Feb 10, 2024 9:24:38 GMT -8
UCLA gets it done - 66-58. Arizona only had 7 players available. They played 8. Couch Barnes, how COULD you!!
|
|
|
Post by beaverstever on Feb 10, 2024 9:27:37 GMT -8
Stanford needed Brink to rescue them. Their guard play really isn’t very good. Still, UW had everything going their way at the end, made some shots that had no business going in. Stanford was clearly better size and talent that was matched by UW playing loose and confident.
This Stanford team looks like a bad matchup can easily early-exit them from the tournament. I like our chances at Gill if foul trouble onbigs doesn’t heavily favor them.
|
|
|
Post by greybeav on Feb 10, 2024 10:25:05 GMT -8
Couch Barnes, how COULD you!! Ok, you lost me, did she say she only had 7, is that the issue? Not surprised if she made excuses, again.
|
|
|
Post by sewingbeaver on Feb 10, 2024 11:43:03 GMT -8
I only tuned into the broadcast for a few minutes and thought I heard that they had just 7. Didn't watch the whole game and really don't plan to.
GO BEAVS!
|
|
|
Post by beaveragain on Feb 10, 2024 12:22:25 GMT -8
Couch Barnes, how COULD you!! Ok, you lost me, did she say she only had 7, is that the issue? Not surprised if she made excuses, again. I was attempting some of that humor stuff implying that she snuck herself into the game to play....explaining jokes always makes you realize you occasionally fail as a jokester. you=me in this case.
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Feb 10, 2024 16:17:27 GMT -8
Just watched a 3 x B12 WBB games. K-State vs OSU Cowgirls, Baylor vs West Virginia, and Texas vs TCU. None of these teams would finish in the TOP 4 of the PAC-12. The quality of basketball in PAC-12 is far superior to B12. It bothers me to see some of the teams are currently ranked above the Beavers. Oh well, as long as the Beavs take care of their own business, they will get their opportunity to play teams from another P5 conference come NCAA Tournament.
|
|
|
Post by greybeav on Feb 11, 2024 8:27:47 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by rmancarl on Feb 11, 2024 10:13:54 GMT -8
1st, I realize that Utah had a great team last year and returned most of their players, but how do they rank with a NET 6? They have already lost 7 games, and likely at least 3 more. 2nd, it's sad seeing all of those Pac12 stats. What becomes of all that history? I was hoping players like Beers could make it in the all-time Pac12 stats list. Since there still is a Pac2, and the Pac may return with different teams, do those stats live on, and can Beers, or any OSU/WSU player add their stats for the next two years in with ALL-time stat leaders?
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 11, 2024 13:36:00 GMT -8
1st, I realize that Utah had a great team last year and returned most of their players, but how do they rank with a NET 6? They have already lost 7 games, and likely at least 3 more. 2nd, it's sad seeing all of those Pac12 stats. What becomes of all that history? I was hoping players like Beers could make it in the all-time Pac12 stats list. Since there still is a Pac2, and the Pac may return with different teams, do those stats live on, and can Beers, or any OSU/WSU player add their stats for the next two years in with ALL-time stat leaders? Just dig and read how wbb NET is calculated. Losses can be a positive depending on who and where. Wins a negative. Utah isn't the team that began the season. Their fall is pretty simple... key, huge inuries. It doesn't diminish OSU's win, but Utah played a tougher schedule, then plays a NET #1 conference schedule. Luckily NET is not the only, or major, component of seeding. But, with a NET in the single digits to teens a team is tourney bound. But, with two h2h wins no matter the final NET OSU will be seeded higher. But, need a nice 10-12 game finish. So far, so good
|
|
|
Post by beavdowg on Feb 11, 2024 13:37:42 GMT -8
Sure would love to be able to watch this team in Portland in March or early April!!
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 11, 2024 13:48:57 GMT -8
Sure would love to be able to watch this team in Portland in March or early April!! I'm betting Stanford is 1st choice... unless!?
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Feb 11, 2024 13:55:49 GMT -8
Sure would love to be able to watch this team in Portland in March or early April!! I'm betting Stanford is 1st choice... unless!? We can have 2 x top 16 PAC-12 Teams in the Portland brackets
|
|
|
Post by nwhoopfan on Feb 11, 2024 13:59:29 GMT -8
Cal with the road sweep of the Washington schools. I'm sure they haven't had a road sweep in forever. Their turn around hasn't been as dramatic as OSU's, but they've gotta be one of the biggest surprises in the conference.
On the flip side Washington is maybe the biggest disappointment.
UCLA thrashing Arizona St.
Stanford got off to a slow start but now up 3 at the half against Wazzu.
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 11, 2024 14:07:20 GMT -8
I'm betting Stanford is 1st choice... unless!? We can have 2 x top 16 PAC-12 Teams in the Portland brackets Yep... but, would rather stay away from Stanford until at least the E8. But... I've also not really studied how this system goes?!
|
|
|
Post by beaverwbb fan on Feb 11, 2024 14:08:57 GMT -8
We can have 2 x top 16 PAC-12 Teams in the Portland brackets Yep... but, would rather stay away from Stanford until at least the E8. But... I've also not really studied how this system goes?! I think that could still happen. There’s only two regionals now. I’m not 100% sure though.
|
|