|
|
Post by orangeattack on Jun 14, 2016 8:57:50 GMT -8
In 2010 the NCAA hit SC for 10 scholarships per year and a 2 year post-season ban. I wrote an article back then saying they wouldn't rebound until at least 2017 and maybe not until 2020.
Not sure what ended up being the most detrimental to the program, the penalties or Lane Kiffin. Maybe the 1-2 punch of Kiffin and Sark. They've lost 20 games over the last 4 years though, and in 2015 they still were only able to get up to 75 kids on scholarship, but with only 16 of them being seniors they should be back to 85 schollies with this class. Will be interesting to see how they fare the next 3 years.
|
|
sabzi
Freshman
Posts: 157 
|
Post by sabzi on Jun 14, 2016 9:19:29 GMT -8
I'd heavily lean more towards the 1-2 punch of Kiffin and Sark. They were atrocious as the head man posting negative coach effect marks in every one of their respective seasons. Not sure Helton is the man for the job either. Vegas has them at 7.5 and the over is enticing but they won't be SC of old this year at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Jun 14, 2016 9:28:25 GMT -8
Frankly, Kiffen did pretty well considering the penalties in effect. I think the combo of the penalties and the Sark affects them more. Unfortunately for the rest of the league, they're still "USC" and it's going to take some pretty bad recruiting for them not to load up with 4 and 5 star talent and some extended poor coaching for them not to be near the top of the league for any length of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by atownbeaver on Jun 16, 2016 7:15:49 GMT -8
In 2010 the NCAA hit SC for 10 scholarships per year and a 2 year post-season ban. I wrote an article back then saying they wouldn't rebound until at least 2017 and maybe not until 2020. Not sure what ended up being the most detrimental to the program, the penalties or Lane Kiffin. Maybe the 1-2 punch of Kiffin and Sark. They've lost 20 games over the last 4 years though, and in 2015 they still were only able to get up to 75 kids on scholarship, but with only 16 of them being seniors they should be back to 85 schollies with this class. Will be interesting to see how they fare the next 3 years. Penalties were annoying, and I think they could of been an issue, if say USC had a rash of untimely injuries. But, in the end, when you are SC you basically have 75 4* players instead of 85... (hyperbole, but you get my point). SC still had very high average star classes. So, I too, would lean towards Kiffen/Sark. By their powers combined they basically undid anything Carroll had going on. |
|
|
|
Post by TheGlove on Jun 16, 2016 8:49:38 GMT -8
In 2010 the NCAA hit SC for 10 scholarships per year and a 2 year post-season ban. I wrote an article back then saying they wouldn't rebound until at least 2017 and maybe not until 2020. Not sure what ended up being the most detrimental to the program, the penalties or Lane Kiffin. Maybe the 1-2 punch of Kiffin and Sark. They've lost 20 games over the last 4 years though, and in 2015 they still were only able to get up to 75 kids on scholarship, but with only 16 of them being seniors they should be back to 85 schollies with this class. Will be interesting to see how they fare the next 3 years. This is the kind of top notch football discussion you get for your $9.95/month at Benny's House. |
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Jun 16, 2016 16:25:40 GMT -8
In 2010 the NCAA hit SC for 10 scholarships per year and a 2 year post-season ban. I wrote an article back then saying they wouldn't rebound until at least 2017 and maybe not until 2020. Not sure what ended up being the most detrimental to the program, the penalties or Lane Kiffin. Maybe the 1-2 punch of Kiffin and Sark. They've lost 20 games over the last 4 years though, and in 2015 they still were only able to get up to 75 kids on scholarship, but with only 16 of them being seniors they should be back to 85 schollies with this class. Will be interesting to see how they fare the next 3 years. This is the kind of top notch football discussion you get for your $9.95/month at Benny's House. At one point Kiffin had like 62 kids on scholarship. Even at USC that's got to have an impact... but I always thought both Kiff and Sark were clowns from day one. |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jun 16, 2016 18:11:14 GMT -8
This is the kind of top notch football discussion you get for your $9.95/month at Benny's House. At one point Kiffin had like 62 kids on scholarship. Even at USC that's got to have an impact... but I always thought both Kiff and Sark were clowns from day one. Perhaps. But Kiffin's wife is hot. So, take that for what it's worth. |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Jun 16, 2016 18:39:11 GMT -8
Perhaps. But Kiffin's wife is hot. So, take that for what it's worth. Soon-to-be-ex-wife. And she's not that hot. You must be more into the Anne Ramsey type of gal. |
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Jun 16, 2016 19:36:12 GMT -8
Soon-to-be-ex-wife. And she's not that hot. You must be more into the Anne Ramsey type of gal. Kudos for the Anne Ramsey reference. |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jun 17, 2016 7:36:58 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jun 17, 2016 8:47:19 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by orangeattack on Jun 17, 2016 14:02:54 GMT -8
LMAO
this forum collectively is like the dogs from the movie UP!
squirrel!
|
|
|
|
Post by beavs6 on Jun 17, 2016 14:15:37 GMT -8
Or just dogs...
|
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jun 20, 2016 7:13:35 GMT -8
Can we not add a poll this far down into a post....we might need to open this up to the group at large: Who is better looking? - Layla Kiffin
![]() 
- Amanda Enfield
 - Jen Bielema
 ![]()
My take: There's no correct answer. They all look pretty much the same to me. I'll go with Anne Ramsey
That Top photo is about 7 years old. Why don't you try comparing apples with apples, if you're going to do that.  And Jen Bielema, close-up, is NOT anywhere near either of them. Not even remotely. You say to compare apples to apples, and then post a bikini shot? Dirty pool man.....dirty pool. I was trying to keep the last shred of maturity possible for this thread, but I should've known better. |
|
|
|
Post by ag87 on Jun 20, 2016 10:29:13 GMT -8
Whole heartedly respect the links and photos - This is not like a poor thread where women are objectified and the reader is forced to find their own links to make an opinion.
(Post is a mixture of sarcasm, humor, irony and truth)
|
|
