|
|
Post by zeroposter on Mar 5, 2021 15:01:42 GMT -8
So we have had vaccine priority lists. Makes perfect sense. Under 65 years and the risk is small for healthy individuals. It will be some time for the under 50 group.
I do get a laugh from seeing that people with vaccinations for covid should get a "passport" to attend sporting events and other activities. A perfectly healthy, 35 year old who is not eligible for the vaccine and won't be fully vaccinated for quite some time wouldn't be able to attend a Beaver baseball game for example while the high risk, 80 year old with the vaccination who really was the basis for the extreme shutdowns, can attend the games?
Obviously, the protocols for Beaver baseball attendance haven't been set. Just an odd thought.
|
|
whocares
Freshman
Posts: 149 
Member is Online
|
Post by whocares on Mar 5, 2021 16:42:57 GMT -8
That 80 year old likely only has a few more years of watching the Beavs in person while the 35 year old has 45+ years to look forward to, all else being equal. Which group contains donors of 50+ year standing? More than one way to look at it.
|
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Mar 5, 2021 16:48:18 GMT -8
So we have had vaccine priority lists. Makes perfect sense. Under 65 years and the risk is small for healthy individuals. It will be some time for the under 50 group. I do get a laugh from seeing that people with vaccinations for covid should get a "passport" to attend sporting events and other activities. A perfectly healthy, 35 year old who is not eligible for the vaccine and won't be fully vaccinated for quite some time wouldn't be able to attend a Beaver baseball game for example while the high risk, 80 year old with the vaccination who really was the basis for the extreme shutdowns, can attend the games? Obviously, the protocols for Beaver baseball attendance haven't been set. Just an odd thought. You're right, but there have been quite a few younger people who have somehow been able to get their shots. Teachers, for example. And anyone in a medical setting. But yeah, I wouldn't say that the majority of a typical ballgame crowd has become eligible yet. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, if OSU gets permission to allow any attendance at all. |
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Mar 5, 2021 16:53:50 GMT -8
So we have had vaccine priority lists. Makes perfect sense. Under 65 years and the risk is small for healthy individuals. It will be some time for the under 50 group. I do get a laugh from seeing that people with vaccinations for covid should get a "passport" to attend sporting events and other activities. A perfectly healthy, 35 year old who is not eligible for the vaccine and won't be fully vaccinated for quite some time wouldn't be able to attend a Beaver baseball game for example while the high risk, 80 year old with the vaccination who really was the basis for the extreme shutdowns, can attend the games? Obviously, the protocols for Beaver baseball attendance haven't been set. Just an odd thought. You're right, but there have been quite a few younger people who have somehow been able to get their shots. Teachers, for example. And anyone in a medical setting. But yeah, I wouldn't say that the majority of a typical ballgame crowd has become eligible yet. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, if OSU gets permission to allow any attendance at all. The medical field, first responders and teachers. The elderly and vulnerable. All good. Just some very strange future situations. |
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Mar 5, 2021 21:02:16 GMT -8
That 80 year old likely only has a few more years of watching the Beavs in person while the 35 year old has 45+ years to look forward to, all else being equal. Which group contains donors of 50+ year standing? More than one way to look at it. I wish there was a thumbs down button about now. |
|
