|
|
Post by Judge Smails on May 19, 2020 17:16:09 GMT -8
[br Good. You’re probably too old for her anyway. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2020 17:47:36 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on May 19, 2020 18:08:40 GMT -8
You’re repeating yourself. We all know how you feel about Destiny, who by the way, was 49-17 (74%) as a starter at OSU. bennyshouse.com/post/178384 |
|
|
|
Post by beavershoopsfan on May 19, 2020 18:12:46 GMT -8
Pendletonbeaver really missed the mark with his previous post. Slocum was a quality teammate. She did not "destroy" team chemistry. She was well liked by her teammates. She said the appropriate things to the media. Slocum is no longer a Beaver, so it is easier for some to place some blame on her that the Beavs finished 23-9 instead of something more in line with the team's 15-0 start.
If she had shot more than 12.5 shots per game, she would have had more impressive scoring stats. She shot and played well this past season. There were times when opposing defenses (including Stanford) could not slow her. She averaged nearly 15/5 points/assists per game on limited shots. I think that some of us have been spoiled by the play of quality point guards and really may not have fully appreciated what Slocum did during her two years of court time in Corvallis.
I won't defend Slocum any longer from posts like the one above. I just don't like reading a negative post that describes a player inaccurately as a "team chemistry" problem. If Slocum was, Rueck would have been aware of it and wouldn't have told her that she was welcome to return if she didn't find the right program for herself.
|
|
