|
Post by kersting13 on May 14, 2020 14:10:36 GMT -8
From hereThe most interesting piece of this data:
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on May 14, 2020 16:01:31 GMT -8
From hereThe most interesting piece of this data: Of course, the question this doesn't answer is what % of people under age 65 and under age 75 have none of the "underlying illnesses"? A lot of young, healthy, active people can have diabetes, asthma, or an immunodeficiency.
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on May 14, 2020 18:38:27 GMT -8
From hereThe most interesting piece of this data: Of course, the question this doesn't answer is what % of people under age 65 and under age 75 have none of the "underlying illnesses"? A lot of young, healthy, active people can have diabetes, asthma, or an immunodeficiency. And now they've removed that original info, because they can't say what % of people under age 65 or 75 have no underlying illnesses. Still, I believe the original gist still exists - if you're under age 65 and have no underlying conditions, you have a near zero chance of dying from a COVID-19 infection, and the younger you are, the lower your risk.
|
|
|
Post by sagebrush on May 15, 2020 3:03:45 GMT -8
Youe numbers are why us old goats are nervous. I have had a heart attack and only 3/4 of my heart works. I have had bladder cancer which is in remission. Even on reopening, I plan on being a hermit to see how that works out.
|
|
|
Post by ag87 on May 15, 2020 8:18:50 GMT -8
Of course, the question this doesn't answer is what % of people under age 65 and under age 75 have none of the "underlying illnesses"? A lot of young, healthy, active people can have diabetes, asthma, or an immunodeficiency. And now they've removed that original info, because they can't say what % of people under age 65 or 75 have no underlying illnesses. Still, I believe the original gist still exists - if you're under age 65 and have no underlying conditions, you have a near zero chance of dying from a COVID-19 infection, and the younger you are, the lower your risk. The big unknown for me is what percentage of people have underlying conditions. I know that percentage goes up as you age. For me, I have GI disease (Crohn's) and I'm 56. I run, weight train, some yoga, eat right, etc, but I believe if I caught the virus it would knock the sh1t out of me. I think everyone I know around my age group has something they take pills for - hypertension, pre-diabetes, a heart condition and so on. What do you think that percentage is? I'm guessing over 50% for ages 50+, maybe 75% for ages 60+. My circle is limited so I'm curious what other people think the preexisting percentages are.
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on May 15, 2020 10:54:30 GMT -8
And now they've removed that original info, because they can't say what % of people under age 65 or 75 have no underlying illnesses. Still, I believe the original gist still exists - if you're under age 65 and have no underlying conditions, you have a near zero chance of dying from a COVID-19 infection, and the younger you are, the lower your risk. The big unknown for me is what percentage of people have underlying conditions. I know that percentage goes up as you age. For me, I have GI disease (Crohn's) and I'm 56. I run, weight train, some yoga, eat right, etc, but I believe if I caught the virus it would knock the sh1t out of me. I think everyone I know around my age group has something they take pills for - hypertension, pre-diabetes, a heart condition and so on. What do you think that percentage is? I'm guessing over 50% for ages 50+, maybe 75% for ages 60+. My circle is limited so I'm curious what other people think the preexisting percentages are. I would have to think it surely goes up with age. Some of the most "healthy" or "in shape" people can have conditions like diabetes, or asthma, or Crohn's (my 24 yo niece has Crohn's) so it's not like the underlying illnesses have to be something drastic. The last thing I think we want to do is minimize the disease - the target population of "older" and "underlying conditions" is a VERY large portion of the population. I just thought the information presented in it's original form was pretty interesting and informative - even if when you follow the link now, it has been changed.
|
|