Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2019 17:56:27 GMT -8
GT ArticleWhen Taylor Jones stepped onto the Oregon State campus to begin her college basketball career, she knew she was going to need to learn a lot to get on the court. And she was more than willing to put in that work. It began with the details that the 6-foot-4 Jones said she never put much thought into as she was typically one of taller, if not the tallest player on the court in high school.
|
|
|
Post by willtalk on Nov 26, 2019 18:44:38 GMT -8
That is one of the problems that players face coming out of high school. Along with picking up bad habits that don't show up against lesser competition, they often do not really know what they need to work on because they are never challenged. Jones is not the only player who faced that problem. That is Trish's main problem. She never faced competition that challenged her even less than Jones. That is why she played other sports instead of focusing on basketball year-round. Jones at least faced better competition in AAU. What really set Jones back was her injury. The Jr year is the worst year to miss due to injury. You miss that year of development along with needing much of your SR year to iron out the kinks.
|
|
|
Post by believeinthebeavs on Nov 26, 2019 18:46:56 GMT -8
Thanks for the link.
I very interested in how she will do Friday. So far she has done better than expected. I'm not expecting her to necessarily win the match up, that would be a tall order, but to play her own game well.
|
|
|
Post by bvrbooster on Nov 26, 2019 20:52:35 GMT -8
Thanks for the link. I very interested in how she will do Friday. So far she has done better than expected. I'm not expecting her to necessarily win the match up, that would be a tall order, but to play her own game well. That's the key, isn't it? All she needs to do on Friday is come close to holding her own, and let the other 4 starters win the game for us. I don't know much about Miami,but there's no way, on paper, their guards match up with ours. If their 5 position outscores ours by 8, barring a 28% field goal percentage for the day, our 1, 2, and 3 positions should outscore theirs by 15. It's good that she recognizes overwhelmingly superior players in high school rely too much on that superiority at the expense of the fundamentals. Scott and staff know how to develop a post player, and they have a wonderful piece of clay to mould in Jones.
|
|
|
Post by markarmour04 on Nov 27, 2019 10:14:51 GMT -8
I agree with the premise of the story, but it also true that Jones is the most developed post OSU has ever had at this stage of her career (5 games). Perhaps she has picked up a lot of this in the past few months with the coaches, but some of her skills (catching imperfect passes, establishing post position, passing, beating the defender down the floor, shot blocking) are rare for players of her size and youth.
|
|
|
Post by 411500 on Nov 27, 2019 12:02:23 GMT -8
markarmour04 - - I like what you wrote about Jones.....I'd like to highlight something you said that is not mentioned too often. She runs the floor. And she runs it fast. Her transition from the defensive paint to the offensive paint is the best since Gulich, and Gulich was the best at it that I can remember in the past 10 years...
As lots of regulars here have already noted, she's a good one and she's gonna get better.... GO BEAVS !!
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Nov 27, 2019 12:21:58 GMT -8
We have every reason to be excited about Taylor Jones thus far, and her potential going forward. I am also excited about Kennedy Brown. She has been a real plus for OSU thus far. Not getting the same attention by the media, but this kid has just as much potential. When Kennedy develops a D1 physique, she is going to make waves. Kennedy is already demonstrating great skill, poise, and the only thing I see holding her back is experience and a college made physique (that Taylor Jones already possesses).
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Nov 27, 2019 12:45:55 GMT -8
We have every reason to be excited about Taylor Jones thus far, and her potential going forward. I am also excited about Kennedy Brown. She has been a real plus for OSU thus far. Not getting the same attention by the media, but this kid has just as much potential. When Kennedy develops a D1 physique, she is going to make waves. Kennedy is already demonstrating great skill, poise, and the only thing I see holding her back is experience and a college made physique (that Taylor Jones already possesses). As I watch both Taylor seems much more comfortable in her role so far. Kennedy seems to want to be a face up wing type, but not quite to the D1 level as far as footspeed, ability to drive from 15-18', and quick release. But, even at the high post she doesn't look reall comfy with her back to the basket, nor have the low post game. Kennedy seems to have to think more, has less confidence in what she's being sked to do at this point. She'll obviously improve, but not sure she'll ever be a complete wing type that i've heard she desires to focus on. Nice to have both, and the high low attack for 3+ seasons will cause folks issues!
|
|
2ndGenBeaver
Sophomore
Posts: 1,828
Grad Year: 1991 (MS/CS) 1999 (PhD/CS)
|
Post by 2ndGenBeaver on Nov 27, 2019 13:18:18 GMT -8
We have every reason to be excited about Taylor Jones thus far, and her potential going forward. I am also excited about Kennedy Brown. She has been a real plus for OSU thus far. Not getting the same attention by the media, but this kid has just as much potential. When Kennedy develops a D1 physique, she is going to make waves. Kennedy is already demonstrating great skill, poise, and the only thing I see holding her back is experience and a college made physique (that Taylor Jones already possesses). As I watch both Taylor seems much more comfortable in her role so far. Kennedy seems to want to be a face up wing type, but not quite to the D1 level as far as footspeed, ability to drive from 15-18', and quick release. But, even at the high post she doesn't look reall comfy with her back to the basket, nor have the low post game. Kennedy seems to have to think more, has less confidence in what she's being sked to do at this point. She'll obviously improve, but not sure she'll ever be a complete wing type that i've heard she desires to focus on. Nice to have both, and the high low attack for 3+ seasons will cause folks issues! I am enjoying watching both Taylor and Kennedy, and look forward to the next 3 seasons as well. I think Taylor was able to come into a situation where her role was completely defined before she even set foot on the floor - whether on O or D, set up within 6 feet of the basket and do what you were doing in High School, but just at a higher level.....And with all due respect to Trish and thanks to the situation with AA and Jelena, the role is whatever she is - there is no alternative (or stiff competition for her minutes). But here we have someone that we already need to point to Ruth or Marie as a junior or senior to get to the same level of stat sheet impact, and so where Taylor goes from here over the next seasons could be breath taking to watch. Kennedy, on the other hand, is having to define her role as a tweener -an outside-in, on occasion inside-out player, with some very high level running mates who can all play at a very high level and give/have given the team value in the past. So coach has to decide if he wants what Janessa or Maddie might bring to those minutes, or go small but experienced with Kat or the like, or go twin towers with Trish......and the "pressure release valve" that Taya represented in that role is gone for the season. Kennedy has had to grasp much more of the O/D concepts, comprehend plays at several positions, and mix it up over a far larger area of the court. She also has to co-exist on rebounding and outside shooting with a ton of returners (Mik and her battle for boards more so far than they get to with our opponents :-). SR sees something, so she is starting, and she is getting to board, and taking shots, and on occasion driving, and is enough of a tweener to pose problems to many teams. And I love her intensity......our team needs someone with her intensity. By the time she is done, we will have a 30 mpg, 15 pt/10 reb/ 2 blk player in Kennedy Brown, and it would not surprise me if it happens sooner rather than later. Her evolution is going to be far ranging and fun to watch. Go Beavers!
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Nov 27, 2019 13:44:07 GMT -8
As I watch both Taylor seems much more comfortable in her role so far. Kennedy seems to want to be a face up wing type, but not quite to the D1 level as far as footspeed, ability to drive from 15-18', and quick release. But, even at the high post she doesn't look reall comfy with her back to the basket, nor have the low post game. Kennedy seems to have to think more, has less confidence in what she's being sked to do at this point. She'll obviously improve, but not sure she'll ever be a complete wing type that i've heard she desires to focus on. Nice to have both, and the high low attack for 3+ seasons will cause folks issues! I am enjoying watching both Taylor and Kennedy, and look forward to the next 3 seasons as well. I think Taylor was able to come into a situation where her role was completely defined before she even set foot on the floor - whether on O or D, set up within 6 feet of the basket and do what you were doing in High School, but just at a higher level.....And with all due respect to Trish and thanks to the situation with AA and Jelena, the role is whatever she is - there is no alternative (or stiff competition for her minutes). But here we have someone that we already need to point to Ruth or Marie as a junior or senior to get to the same level of stat sheet impact, and so where Taylor goes from here over the next seasons could be breath taking to watch. Kennedy, on the other hand, is having to define her role as a tweener -an outside-in, on occasion inside-out player, with some very high level running mates who can all play at a very high level and give/have given the team value in the past. So coach has to decide if he wants what Janessa or Maddie might bring to those minutes, or go small but experienced with Kat or the like, or go twin towers with Trish......and the "pressure release valve" that Taya represented in that role is gone for the season. Kennedy has had to grasp much more of the O/D concepts, comprehend plays at several positions, and mix it up over a far larger area of the court. She also has to co-exist on rebounding and outside shooting with a ton of returners (Mik and her battle for boards more so far than they get to with our opponents :-). SR sees something, so she is starting, and she is getting to board, and taking shots, and on occasion driving, and is enough of a tweener to pose problems to many teams. And I love her intensity......our team needs someone with her intensity. By the time she is done, we will have a 30 mpg, 15 pt/10 reb/ 2 blk player in Kennedy Brown, and it would not surprise me if it happens sooner rather than later. Her evolution is going to be far ranging and fun to watch. Go Beavers! It’s going to be so much fun watching these two young women grow into dominant forces on the court. It will be very interesting to see how they hold up in the latter stages of this first long, intense D1 college season. I’ve seen it grind down older, more experienced players. Remember these games, they are just the beginning of what I expect to be 2 exceptional OSU careers.
|
|