|
Post by bdudbeaver on Feb 26, 2019 19:03:57 GMT -8
That really is an odd play. But you can sure tell it was drawn up exactly like you described. Brilliant! Jo made it happen.
|
|
|
Post by believeinthebeavs on Feb 26, 2019 19:42:03 GMT -8
Aleah and Jo developed a great relationship last year on the practice team and it has extended to games this year.
A couple months ago, just a few weeks into the conference schedule, someone asked me who I thought OSU's best player was. It took me no time to reply that I thought it was Aleah. The guy looked at me like I was crazy and said he thought it was either Destiny or Mik and that Aleah didn't even start. I just smiled and said that Aleah would have something to say about the point guard position before the season was over. I still think that Aleah is our best player overall.
Anyone else notice that since Destiny is so good at driving to the hoop, Aleah had been following suit and several times in the last couple weeks she has made successful drives herself. I would hate to be an opposing coach and try to game plan for such different, but very good, point guards.
|
|
|
Post by willtalk on Feb 26, 2019 20:39:03 GMT -8
People underestimate how valuable a quick release (high arching shot is also a plus ) is for a player. Makes a shot hard to block or defend against. It allowed Goodman to get off shots against quick defenders that are on both Southern California teams. That is also a skill that players need to have at the next level. The quick release ( despite no arch ) is what got Jamie her roster spot on the Sparks.
Goodman has been very solid and consistent this season. She can play aggressively, but also knows when to slow the ball down to re-establish offensive team flow. Her one real shortcoming last season was defense, which she has really improved on this season. Now she is one of the better parameter defenders. It is great to see her intangible skills finally get recognized.
I was glad when Scott removed her from the starting line up and returned her to coming in off the bench. It allows the team to show two completely different offensive looks when she comes in. In the Stanford game she got caught up in the initial tempo and the offensive team flow never surfaced the entire game. Slocum, Pivec and Goodman on the floor to start is not a good combination. Too much dribbling and one on one play. Stanford shut that down those drives to the basket and offensive flow to create open looks never happened.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Feb 26, 2019 21:04:11 GMT -8
People underestimate how valuable a quick release (high arching shot is also a plus ) is for a player. Makes a shot hard to block or defend against. It allowed Goodman to get off shots against quick defenders that are on both Southern California teams. That is also a skill that players need to have at the next level. The quick release ( despite no arch ) is what got Jamie her roster spot on the Sparks. Goodman has been very solid and consistent this season. She can play aggressively, but also knows when to slow the ball down to re-establish offensive team flow. Her one real shortcoming last season was defense, which she has really improved on this season. Now she is one of the better parameter defenders. It is great to see her intangible skills finally get recognized. I was glad when Scott removed her from the starting line up and returned her to coming in off the bench. It allows the team to show two completely different offensive looks when she comes in. In the Stanford game she got caught up in the initial tempo and the offensive team flow never surfaced the entire game. Slocum, Pivec and Goodman on the floor to start is not a good combination. Too much dribbling and one on one play. Stanford shut that down those drives to the basket and offensive flow to create open looks never happened. People who aren't real familiar with the game and the "physics" of a optimal shot trajectory don't realize what a correct/high arc does. Not only does it allow for better "touch" in softer bounce and better rebound angles off the backboard, but it increases the "target" size. I use to use a simple illustration for players as I tried to get them to finish with their shooting elbow eye high. Thumb and forefinger touching form the rim. Your eyes are the ball in flight. Eyes above rim, but rim at chin level... can hardly see an opening. Lowering you see that the target and opportunity for the ball to hit said target looks far larger. Which target do you want to hit? For those old enough the old Buck Jon McGlocklin use to bring rain.
|
|
|
Post by willtalk on Feb 26, 2019 21:06:10 GMT -8
Aleah and Jo developed a great relationship last year on the practice team and it has extended to games this year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anyone else notice that since Destiny is so good at driving to the hoop, Aleah had been following suit and several times in the last couple weeks she has made successful drives herself. I would hate to be an opposing coach and try to game plan for such different, but very good, point guards. I always try to notice players intangibles that do not show up in the score card. One thing that Jo has always attempted to do is set picks and screens for teammates. Unfortunately they never seemed to use them Destiny was the exception. She always used Jo's picks to her advantage. In one recent game she used three of Jo's picks in a row to get a clear lane to the hoop. She is also adept at running her defender into people who are not even trying to set picks. I am sure Aleah has watched and learned. Something Aleah does well with Jo is the pick and roll. The other players do not. Every player has things that they do well and other things they need to work on. Sometimes they have reached their ceilings and those weak area's will always remain weak and their strengths have already maxed out. Both Slocum and Goodman still have weak area's that can be improved as do the other players on the team as well. With Slocum it's decision making in respect to establishing team balance in contrast with when to call her own number. She also needs to learn to establishing position on defense rather than relying too much on her quickness. A really good player will use her foot speed against her. If we rely too much on our strengths those very strengths soon become our weaknesss.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Feb 26, 2019 21:06:15 GMT -8
People underestimate how valuable a quick release (high arching shot is also a plus ) is for a player. Makes a shot hard to block or defend against. It allowed Goodman to get off shots against quick defenders that are on both Southern California teams. That is also a skill that players need to have at the next level. The quick release ( despite no arch ) is what got Jamie her roster spot on the Sparks. Goodman has been very solid and consistent this season. She can play aggressively, but also knows when to slow the ball down to re-establish offensive team flow. Her one real shortcoming last season was defense, which she has really improved on this season. Now she is one of the better parameter defenders. It is great to see her intangible skills finally get recognized. I was glad when Scott removed her from the starting line up and returned her to coming in off the bench. It allows the team to show two completely different offensive looks when she comes in. In the Stanford game she got caught up in the initial tempo and the offensive team flow never surfaced the entire game. Slocum, Pivec and Goodman on the floor to start is not a good combination. Too much dribbling and one on one play. Stanford shut that down those drives to the basket and offensive flow to create open looks never happened. People who aren't real familiar with the game and the "physics" of a optimal shot trajectory don't realize what a correct/high arc does. Not only does it allow for better "touch" in softer bounce and better rebound angles of the backboard, but it increases the "target" size. I use to use a built simple illustration for players as I tried to get them to finish with their shooting elbow eye high. Thumb and forefinger touching form the rim. Your eyes are the ball in flight. Eyes above rim, but rim at chin level... can hardly see an opening. Lowering you see that the target and opportunity for the ball to hit said target looks far larger. Which target do you want to hit? For those old enough the old Buck Jon McGlocklin use to bring rain. That’s been the problem with Katie’s shot. Very flat. Reminds me of Drexler.
|
|
|
Post by beaveragain on Feb 26, 2019 21:10:57 GMT -8
My memory of Aleah's first year seems different from others. I remember a gal that couldn't keep the ball safe, had a nervous tick dribble that was outright dangerous for the team, and seemed at times to have lost track on where the play was supposed to go. Potential, but would need another year to be more than a three point shooter at need. Where that person went I don't know but this impersonator Aleah has none of those problems. She still has plenty of space for growth, but if the conference had a 6th player award I don't see how she wouldn't get it, to say the least. It's kind of funny when she's on court before the game as she's bouncing around, joking, singing, laughing and generally having a good time. And then the time for interviews comes up and her head goes down and she's not sure what happened out there but gee, she's glad they won.
I think Destiny and Aleah have been great for each other. Their games were very different from each other and they are both smart and love to learn and have gotten better playing with/against each other. In passes alone Aleah has learned to put the pop into her hard passes so they don't get intercepted as much and Destiny has learned to make a soft pass that isn't a slow lob so it doesn't get stolen. I hope that PB and/or HVL see how these two have learned from each other and at least one of them realizes the benefit of learning from these two for a year.
|
|
|
Post by beaverstever on Feb 26, 2019 23:18:33 GMT -8
People underestimate how valuable a quick release (high arching shot is also a plus ) is for a player. Makes a shot hard to block or defend against. It allowed Goodman to get off shots against quick defenders that are on both Southern California teams. That is also a skill that players need to have at the next level. The quick release ( despite no arch ) is what got Jamie her roster spot on the Sparks. Goodman has been very solid and consistent this season. She can play aggressively, but also knows when to slow the ball down to re-establish offensive team flow. Her one real shortcoming last season was defense, which she has really improved on this season. Now she is one of the better parameter defenders. It is great to see her intangible skills finally get recognized. I was glad when Scott removed her from the starting line up and returned her to coming in off the bench. It allows the team to show two completely different offensive looks when she comes in. In the Stanford game she got caught up in the initial tempo and the offensive team flow never surfaced the entire game. Slocum, Pivec and Goodman on the floor to start is not a good combination. Too much dribbling and one on one play. Stanford shut that down those drives to the basket and offensive flow to create open looks never happened. People who aren't real familiar with the game and the "physics" of a optimal shot trajectory don't realize what a correct/high arc does. Not only does it allow for better "touch" in softer bounce and better rebound angles off the backboard, but it increases the "target" size. I use to use a simple illustration for players as I tried to get them to finish with their shooting elbow eye high. Thumb and forefinger touching form the rim. Your eyes are the ball in flight. Eyes above rim, but rim at chin level... can hardly see an opening. Lowering you see that the target and opportunity for the ball to hit said target looks far larger. Which target do you want to hit? For those old enough the old Buck Jon McGlocklin use to bring rain. Geeking out on this topic, I took the "Use all 18 inches of the rim" I learned at basketball camp a bit too far when I was about 12. Two of the gyms in our league had relatively low ceilings, and had my rainbows blocked on multiple occasions by the ceiling. The thinking has evolved on the shot arch over time beyond just the target size based on shot angle. One factor is that higher arching shots are harder to control, and they have more time to be accelerated by gravity on the way down and so are less 'soft' (due to increased speed) if they hit the rim at all. From why I understand, they general thinking is that the optimal shot is the 50 degree launch angle is optimal for someone around 6' tall, and shrinks slightly as you get taller (or release from a higher jumping point). I always assumed shooters like Drexler and Lillard had to shoot much more accurately as a result of their flat shots, but they get the benefit of less vertical force when it does hit the rim (so less rattle-outs, apparently). It does seem like Lillard shoots his shot right AT the break-away sprint box and you rarely see his shots look like Aleahs often don't even have their trajectory altered at all as they go through the net.
|
|