|
Post by osulax24 on Oct 2, 2017 7:01:15 GMT -8
Winners, don't get blown out by 40 pts. In multiple games every season for three years.
Winners, don't retain their buddies as coordinators, despite losing consistently.
Winners, don't hype themselves up, they get wins and results.
Winners, don't chase off the only winning QB we have had in years.
Winners, know their players and schemes, instead of not knowing why a player wasn't available, or not know the gameplan.
Only 11 million to buy him out, drop in the hat for this Univeristy, but I doubt they want to spend it..
|
|
|
Post by osulax24 on Oct 2, 2017 7:03:49 GMT -8
hey kersting what if he is right? Then he should be part of the solution, not part of the problem. I'm at every damn home game, donate to the program, watch all the games, post as much as I can to the message board, etc. What's lax doing? Showing up and complaining that our fan base sucks? That's helpful. SaveSaveHow does posting on a message board as much as you can, make you a better fan than me?
|
|
|
Post by kersting13 on Oct 2, 2017 8:29:44 GMT -8
Then he should be part of the solution, not part of the problem. I'm at every damn home game, donate to the program, watch all the games, post as much as I can to the message board, etc. What's lax doing? Showing up and complaining that our fan base sucks? That's helpful. SaveSaveHow does posting on a message board as much as you can, make you a better fan than me? Show me where I said I was a better fan than you. Show me where I said you don't go to games. What I said was that showing up here and bitching about how bad the fan base is, is unhelpful. Do something constructive instead of just claiming all the fans suck.
|
|
|
Post by osulax24 on Oct 2, 2017 10:06:07 GMT -8
I think there are a lot of big money, successful alumni, who would invest, unfortunately the fans are lame and have created a loser atmosphere that's hard to back. Get some pride Beaver Nation Show us how to do that "winner's" attitude lax. SaveSaveHere ya go, have a nice day
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Oct 2, 2017 10:43:50 GMT -8
I suppose it's a "chicken or egg first" argument. If you build it, they will come....or....If they come, you will build it.
|
|
|
Post by atownbeaver on Oct 2, 2017 11:04:58 GMT -8
I suppose it's a "chicken or egg first" argument. If you build it, they will come....or....If they come, you will build it. What we are in, is a death spiral. Can't attract recruits because we can't win. We can't win because we can't get the right recruits. The recruits we do get, aren't getting coached up. Can't build if you don't win, can't win if you don't build. We have to break the cycle. Much like when the economy goes in a recession the one and only time honored solution is for the federal government to deficit spend, and look to recoup down the road when the economy is back on track. OSU is the government here. Deficit spend, fire your do-nothing coaches, bring in a new squad, get some better marketing and PR going on... make your ticket packages attractive and get people in the stands and hope like hell you build a winner again... get your attendance back in the 40,000's slowly start upping the ticket prices and look to recoup on your spending.
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Oct 2, 2017 13:04:05 GMT -8
Winners, don't get blown out by 40 pts. In multiple games every season for three years. Winners, don't retain their buddies as coordinators, despite losing consistently. Winners, don't hype themselves up, they get wins and results. Winners, don't chase off the only winning QB we have had in years. Winners, know their players and schemes, instead of not knowing why a player wasn't available, or not know the gameplan. Only 11 million to buy him out, drop in the hat for this Univeristy, but I doubt they want to spend it.. To be fair, GAG has not lost a 40+ point game this year and only lost one such game in 2016. How about number of 24+ point losses? 2015: 5 2016: 2 2017: 4 11 out of 29 games (37.93%) were 24+ point losses. Riley: 1997: 2 1998: 0 2003: 2 2004: 1 2005: 2 2006: 2 2007: 2 2008: 2 2009: 1 2010: 1 2011: 3 2012: 1 2013: 1 2014: 4 24 out of 173 games (13.87%) were 24+ point losses. Erickson: 1999: 1 2000: 0 2001: 1 2002: 1 3 out of 48 games (6.25%) were 24+ point losses. Pettibone: 1991: 5 1992: 6 1993: 3 1994: 0 1995: 1 1996: 5 20 out of 66 games (30.30%) were 24+ point losses. GAG's 29 games have included the most 24+ point losses since the first three years of Pettibone. Kragthrope: 1985: 3 1986: 2 1987: 6 1988: 0 1989: 4 1990: 7 22 out of 67 games (32.84%) were 24+ point losses. Avezzano: 1980: 5 1981: 8 1982: 4 1983: 5 1984: 2 24 out of 55 games (43.64%) were 24+ point losses. Fertig: 1976: 3 1977: 3 1978: 2 1979: 5 13 out of 45 games (28.89%) were 24+ point losses. Andros: 1965: 0 1966: 1 1967: 0 1968: 0 1969: 3 1970: 2 1971: 2 1972: 5 1973: 2 1974: 1 1975: 3 19 out of 116 games (16.38%) were 24+ point losses.
|
|
|
Post by obf on Oct 2, 2017 13:38:09 GMT -8
I suppose it's a "chicken or egg first" argument. If you build it, they will come....or....If they come, you will build it. What we are in, is a death spiral. Can't attract recruits because we can't win. We can't win because we can't get the right recruits. The recruits we do get, aren't getting coached up. Can't build if you don't win, can't win if you don't build. We have to break the cycle. Much like when the economy goes in a recession the one and only time honored solution is for the federal government to deficit spend, and look to recoup down the road when the economy is back on track. OSU is the government here. Deficit spend, fire your do-nothing coaches, bring in a new squad, get some better marketing and PR going on... make your ticket packages attractive and get people in the stands and hope like hell you build a winner again... get your attendance back in the 40,000's slowly start upping the ticket prices and look to recoup on your spending. = Totally agree about deficit spending to get a real coach... Lots of coaches have proven that you can win and build off of 2 star recruits that are coached up, or are hidden gems... In College football it is ALL about the coach...
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Oct 2, 2017 15:44:15 GMT -8
What we are in, is a death spiral. Can't attract recruits because we can't win. We can't win because we can't get the right recruits. The recruits we do get, aren't getting coached up. Can't build if you don't win, can't win if you don't build. We have to break the cycle. Much like when the economy goes in a recession the one and only time honored solution is for the federal government to deficit spend, and look to recoup down the road when the economy is back on track. OSU is the government here. Deficit spend, fire your do-nothing coaches, bring in a new squad, get some better marketing and PR going on... make your ticket packages attractive and get people in the stands and hope like hell you build a winner again... get your attendance back in the 40,000's slowly start upping the ticket prices and look to recoup on your spending. = Totally agree about deficit spending to get a real coach... Lots of coaches have proven that you can win and build off of 2 star recruits that are coached up, or are hidden gems... In College football it is ALL about the coach... ... and his staffing selections. When you can't do either you tend to have issues! We have ISSUES 😣
|
|