|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Mar 1, 2024 11:52:50 GMT -8
I love this! I was super bummed the network was going to go away. Now nothing but 24-7 Beavs and Cougs! Sounds good to me Their will be no linear carriage of the network. Just production studios only. So how will we get the content? How much content will they produce? I have questions dammit!
|
|
|
Post by beaver55to7 on Mar 1, 2024 12:21:06 GMT -8
Their will be no linear carriage of the network. Just production studios only. So how will we get the content? How much content will they produce? I have questions dammit! This article has the some answers: awfulannouncing.com/league-networks/pac-12-studio-operations-only.htmlPerhaps the most substantive development came from Gould, who revealed that the Pac-12 Networks’ production studio in San Ramon, Calif., will remain active for the 2024-25 school year. Although the networks will cease to exist as a media distribution company, the studio will support Washington State and Oregon State “with live events and content,” Gould said. (No specifics were provided.) And during this span, Oregon State and Washington State will likely need to produce their home football games. Where those will air is not clear yet. But if it’s somewhere other than ESPN or Fox, they’ll probably need to do their own production. And there are plenty of P12 Nets personnel with experience producing football games, and that should make for an easier sell to, say, streaming platforms that don’t already have production infrastructure. It also seems reasonably smart to have the networks “cease to exist as a media distribution company” (presuming that that means ending the linear channels). Yes, there’s a world where they could have rolled on in some very limited way, perhaps with the combination of the Oregon (formerly Oregon State and Oregon) and Washington (formerly Washington State and Washington) regional feeds and the national feed as one channel. Texas made a one-school channel work for a decade, even if that’s soon going away. And this has double the potential content of that. But the distribution and per-subscriber fee numbers here were already so bad even before this exodus that there seemingly wasn’t a lot to be gained there. And even the idea of a Pac-2 Network was drawing jokes Thursday (based on tweets about the network surviving, not just the studio):
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Mar 1, 2024 12:31:59 GMT -8
Question - would the P-12 Network be a big drawing point for streaming media services like Amazon, Apple, etc? 'big', no not big. Handy to have the infrastructure, but to someone like Amazon or Apple, they lose billions on developing an electric car and then just dump it. A few million for production studio equipment will not move the needle for them. So true, and the misnomer that folks said the Pac12 network was "worth nothing" is mostly false when reading past posts. Most talked about "leverage" not worth. The Pac12 network provides no "leverage" as companies like you mentioned could do their own thing with very little investment to their overall pocketbook. As far as leverage for other conferences to invite the Pac2... again almost none as the physical assets are on the west coast and most conferences have stopped investing big dollars into their conference owned media as their new media packages provide not only the dollars but extended coverage. Of course the physical plant is worth dollars, but mainly to the Pac2 as it is setup and ready. To anyone else it is worth pennies on the dollar. If it wasn't some media company would have scooped it up already. As of now, it'll be a "shell" operated by the Pac2 on mostly likely a shoe-string budget. It's continued existence doesn't change the fact the Pac2 need to sell all the inventory they possibly can.
|
|