|
|
Post by zeroposter on Sept 30, 2023 11:18:04 GMT -8
USC and CU are both very beatable. That improved USC defense is helping a badly undermanned Colorado team in the game. Sanders can play. |
|
|
|
Post by EmeraldEmpire on Sept 30, 2023 11:18:08 GMT -8
USC 48 - CU 34 with 10 minutes to go in the 4th  welp Prime's team is certainly showing a bit more fight in them then they did last week at Autzen ... |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Sept 30, 2023 11:18:37 GMT -8
I'd agree if your offense is in track meet mode. OSU is not that offense and both have schemes very similar to WSU.
SC's D is much better than last year which was terrible. But, as some have a hard time figuring out, "vastly improved" doesn't mean great or even good. Buffs are tearing it up in 2nd half... mid 3rd qtr on.
OSU is built to handle physical teams. But, as bad as we want to think WSU was, teams like Col, SC will/would be very difficult.
Early on it is tough to judge Cal vs ASU. Cal does have weapons... you definitely want to stop their run game.
QB Jackson V is mobile, and reminds a lot of Johnson last night.
Ott and 2 other backs are good. Thomas true frosh getting more time and is fast.
D gives up almost 28 per so not seeing much to prove that wrong. But ASU is bad...
|
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Sept 30, 2023 11:39:54 GMT -8
I 100% agree, just don't think they have the guns to out race USC. That game could have 1200 combined yardw What SC is getting 900+?? Buffs had like 199 yds vs Oregon's D and that was with subs playing all of the 4th. SC is vastly improved on D and can flat out run. Buffs at home will be better, but maybe 350 yds if SC let's up. SC could score every possession and hopefully puts up a 60 spot! Haha I don't know which is more funny...how wrong you were, or how triggered you got for getting called out for it despite trying to outsmart another poster. USCs VASTLY improved D just gave up 550 yards...its worst showing to date, against a team missing its best receiver! Colorado outgained USC hahaha. Oregon and Washington should go for 600 each against this gaping wound of a defense. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Sept 30, 2023 11:51:56 GMT -8
What SC is getting 900+?? Buffs had like 199 yds vs Oregon's D and that was with subs playing all of the 4th. SC is vastly improved on D and can flat out run. Buffs at home will be better, but maybe 350 yds if SC let's up. SC could score every possession and hopefully puts up a 60 spot! Haha I don't know which is more funny...how wrong you were, or how triggered you got for getting called out for it despite trying to outsmart another poster. USCs VASTLY improved D just gave up 550 yards...its worst showing to date, against a team missing its best receiver! Colorado outgained USC hahaha. Oregon and Washington should go for 600 each against this gaping wound of a defense. You realize I never stated SC's D was great, top level in the Pac12, or good enough to win a title. Vastly improved is relative to last season when they were in the 100's in many defensive metrics. They are not now! It is the immaturity of your own ego that wanted to argue "vastly improved" by calling out comparative rankings of this current season. Which has zero to do with their year over year improvement. Then you use this game, at altitude, vs a Colorado offense that might put up 450+ on the rest of their schedule as a "I told you so"! LMAO Again you argue like a child. Argue a point you didn't even comprehend and made it into your own version of reality. By the way OSU D looked atrocious vs WSU. Look very solid last night. Happens all the time. FFS grow up little man |
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Sept 30, 2023 12:11:27 GMT -8
Haha I don't know which is more funny...how wrong you were, or how triggered you got for getting called out for it despite trying to outsmart another poster. USCs VASTLY improved D just gave up 550 yards...its worst showing to date, against a team missing its best receiver! Colorado outgained USC hahaha. Oregon and Washington should go for 600 each against this gaping wound of a defense. You realize I never stated SC's D was great, top level in the Pac12, or good enough to win a title. Vastly improved is relative to last season when they were in the 100's in many defensive metrics. They are not now! It is the immaturity of your own ego that wanted to argue "vastly improved" by calling out comparative rankings of this current season. Which has zero to do with their year over year improvement. Then you use this game, at altitude, vs a Colorado offense that might put up 450+ on the rest of their schedule as a "I told you so"! LMAO Again you argue like a child. Argue a point you didn't even comprehend and made it into your own version of reality. By the way OSU D looked atrocious vs WSU. Look very solid last night. Happens all the time. FFS grow up little man Nah I'm just laughing at you for trying to one-up another poster then failing miserably. You were only off by 200 yards and Colorado didn't need your qualifier. Because USCs D is horrendously bad. The best part of of this is the poster you initially dismissed almost nailed it...and he was probably being hyperbolic saying 1100 yards! You on the other hand... |
|
|
|
Post by sparty on Sept 30, 2023 12:20:27 GMT -8
USC has no defense. Another quarter and things may have been real interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by nuclearbeaver on Sept 30, 2023 12:30:21 GMT -8
What SC is getting 900+?? Buffs had like 199 yds vs Oregon's D and that was with subs playing all of the 4th. SC is vastly improved on D and can flat out run. Buffs at home will be better, but maybe 350 yds if SC let's up. SC could score every possession and hopefully puts up a 60 spot! Haha I don't know which is more funny...how wrong you were, or how triggered you got for getting called out for it despite trying to outsmart another poster. USCs VASTLY improved D just gave up 550 yards...its worst showing to date, against a team missing its best receiver! Colorado outgained USC hahaha. Oregon and Washington should go for 600 each against this gaping wound of a defense. I have him blocked so I missed that. To be fair there was only 1050 yards in the game. To be fair to me CU had 193 rushing yards because USC is stiff as playdough against the run. That's really bad cause even UO crushed their run game and I don't think they have much of a front 7 either. Agree that UW and UO are a bad matchup for USC as they have good ground games. ND is also going to be a serious problem. He'll Utah with no QB has a shot. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Sept 30, 2023 12:41:58 GMT -8
You realize I never stated SC's D was great, top level in the Pac12, or good enough to win a title. Vastly improved is relative to last season when they were in the 100's in many defensive metrics. They are not now! It is the immaturity of your own ego that wanted to argue "vastly improved" by calling out comparative rankings of this current season. Which has zero to do with their year over year improvement. Then you use this game, at altitude, vs a Colorado offense that might put up 450+ on the rest of their schedule as a "I told you so"! LMAO Again you argue like a child. Argue a point you didn't even comprehend and made it into your own version of reality. By the way OSU D looked atrocious vs WSU. Look very solid last night. Happens all the time. FFS grow up little man Nah I'm just laughing at you for trying to one-up another poster then failing miserably. You were only off by 200 yards and Colorado didn't need your qualifier. Because USCs D is horrendously bad. The best part of of this is the poster you initially dismissed almost nailed it...and he was probably being hyperbolic saying 1100 yards! You on the other hand... Nice deflection of your own inadequacies. Try comprehension, but then of course I'd laugh less! And, in case you also need more "edumacation", my post(s), like others about such meaningless drivel are opinion. I believe those can be wrong. And, unlike you... don't effect my ego. |
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Sept 30, 2023 12:52:15 GMT -8
Haha I don't know which is more funny...how wrong you were, or how triggered you got for getting called out for it despite trying to outsmart another poster. USCs VASTLY improved D just gave up 550 yards...its worst showing to date, against a team missing its best receiver! Colorado outgained USC hahaha. Oregon and Washington should go for 600 each against this gaping wound of a defense. I have him blocked so I missed that. To be fair there was only 1050 yards in the game. To be fair to me CU had 193 rushing yards because USC is stiff as playdough against the run. That's really bad cause even UO crushed their run game and I don't think they have much of a front 7 either. Agree that UW and UO are a bad matchup for USC as they have good ground games. ND is also going to be a serious problem. He'll Utah with no QB has a shot. At this point I'm just f'in with him because he gets so triggered. The easy way out is just admit USCs defense IS atrocious. But it is quite funny that your wild guestimate at total yards, that he for some reason felt the need to dismiss with phenomenal insight, was actually really close! |
|
|
|
Post by nuclearbeaver on Sept 30, 2023 13:04:32 GMT -8
I have him blocked so I missed that. To be fair there was only 1050 yards in the game. To be fair to me CU had 193 rushing yards because USC is stiff as playdough against the run. That's really bad cause even UO crushed their run game and I don't think they have much of a front 7 either. Agree that UW and UO are a bad matchup for USC as they have good ground games. ND is also going to be a serious problem. He'll Utah with no QB has a shot. At this point I'm just f'in with him because he gets so triggered. The easy way out is just admit USCs defense IS atrocious. But it is quite funny that your wild guestimate at total yards, that he for some reason felt the need to dismiss with phenomenal insight, was actually really close! It's not rocket science. Both teams throw all the time and have bad defenses. I figured 900+ was likely and I had to ridiculous so I added acouple hundred. George only knows how to attack and say random stuff with confidence. Best ignored. |
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Sept 30, 2023 13:08:43 GMT -8
F'in is exactly what I do with nuke. After all his early whining and weird release of his personal medical info it's like Greg is online. And Bluto emerges.
I love to question his generic media type posts. Especially the "deep" in-game insights. Trigger is the right word.
As far as SC, inept today for sure. Much worse in the 2nd half. So, Nuke's opinion was damn close.
As far as another thinking his lack of comprehension and just trying to be argumentative is triggering? Yeah there's the immature ego. If you respond to such nonsense they claim success in that they were trying to trigger someone. 🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by RenoBeaver on Sept 30, 2023 13:11:53 GMT -8
F'in is exactly what I do with nuke. After all his early whining and weird release of his personal medical info it's like Greg is online. And Bluto emerges. I love to question his generic media type posts. Especially the "deep" in-game insights. Trigger is the right word. As far as SC, inept today for sure. Much worse in the 2nd half. So, Nuke's opinion was damn close. As far as another thinking his lack of comprehension and just trying to be argumentative is triggering? Yeah there's the immature ego. If you respond to such nonsense they claim success in that they were trying to trigger someone. 🤣🤣 And STILL triggered |
|
ftd
Junior
"I think real leaders show up when times are hard." Trent Bray 11/29/2023
Posts: 2,517
Member is Online
|
Post by ftd on Sept 30, 2023 13:12:18 GMT -8
F'in is exactly what I do with nuke. After all his early whining and weird release of his personal medical info it's like Greg is online. And Bluto emerges. I love to question his generic media type posts. Especially the "deep" in-game insights. Trigger is the right word. As far as SC, inept today for sure. Much worse in the 2nd half. So, Nuke's opinion was damn close. As far as another thinking his lack of comprehension and just trying to be argumentative is triggering? Yeah there's the immature ego. If you respond to such nonsense they claim success in that they were trying to trigger someone. 🤣🤣  |
|
|
|
Post by lebaneaver on Sept 30, 2023 13:33:44 GMT -8
u$c’s “d” SUX. Damn schmucks might roll ‘em. I hope they kick the sheeeyit outta each other…..Our Beavs are going to have to dial up some pressure on neon’s son.
|
|
