|
Post by billthebeav on Apr 9, 2023 15:09:52 GMT -8
It was not catcher’s interference or the batter would have been awarded 1st base. It was a late balk call by the 2nd base ump. Judge - that would make sense. Stats link does list as: Nishida, R advanced to second; Grant, G scored on an error by c, interference, unearned. Who knows. Guess they had to break up the shutout. The box score now lists it as a wild pitch. I can’t figure that out but it would be good to get an explanation.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Apr 9, 2023 15:31:46 GMT -8
Judge - that would make sense. Stats link does list as: Nishida, R advanced to second; Grant, G scored on an error by c, interference, unearned. Who knows. Guess they had to break up the shutout. The box score now lists it as a wild pitch. I can’t figure that out but it would be good to get an explanation. It was a balk. Not sure why the scorers can figure that out.
|
|
|
Post by calbeav83 on Apr 9, 2023 16:13:42 GMT -8
It was not a balk. The ball bounced up and got caught behind Wilson's chest protector. Rule states If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.
|
|
|
Post by abureid on Apr 9, 2023 16:25:23 GMT -8
Sweet. We have now won 2 of 3 Pac-12 road series and 3 of 5 overall, and have road trips to Washington, Oregon and Stanford out of the way. Time to take care of business at home. Nothing better than sending every single Duck fans home early in the series finale. Great pitching against a team that had been killing the baseball. Just maybe our coaches know what they are doing. I’m beginning to have the same confidence in Dorman that I have in Michalczik! Dorman is a very good coach.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Apr 9, 2023 16:26:32 GMT -8
It was not a balk. The ball bounced up and got caught behind Wilson's chest protector. Rule states If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base. What the f%#* are you talking about? It was a balk. There is no such rule.
|
|
|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Apr 9, 2023 16:45:58 GMT -8
My understanding was it was catcher interference. Which would make more sense, cuz there was no balk there
|
|
|
Post by calbeav83 on Apr 9, 2023 17:01:13 GMT -8
It was not a balk. The ball bounced up and got caught behind Wilson's chest protector. Rule states If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base. What the f%#* are you talking about? It was a balk. There is no such rule. Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.”
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Apr 9, 2023 17:10:36 GMT -8
What the f%#* are you talking about? It was a balk. There is no such rule. Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” I just watched that play again and I don’t see that.
|
|
|
Post by flyfishinbeav on Apr 9, 2023 19:00:20 GMT -8
Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” I just watched that play again and I don’t see that. I don't know what happened for sure, just going by what my dad told me.....he heard it was the catcher thing...not sure where he got the info.....all I know for sure is when I watched the replay I did not see a balk.....of course, usually when they call a balk I don't see it...do they ever call a balk in MLB? Just seems like it's super ticky tack whenever it's called in college ball
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Apr 9, 2023 19:16:22 GMT -8
What the f%#* are you talking about? It was a balk. There is no such rule. Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” Dude, I’m impressed that you know that rule or at the very least you knew enough to look for it. Well done! Thanks for teaching me something today.
|
|
|
Post by irimi on Apr 9, 2023 19:17:39 GMT -8
Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” I just watched that play again and I don’t see that. Did you record the game or can you point to a replay? I’ve been looking and can’t seem to find it.
|
|
|
Post by Werebeaver on Apr 10, 2023 6:17:15 GMT -8
What the f%#* are you talking about? It was a balk. There is no such rule. Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” That would explain why the 2nd base ump’s call was so late (for a balk well after the pitch was delivered and ball/strike call was made). Also why it’s in the score line as a “wild pitch”. Works for me (although I’m always impressed by Judge’s certitude).
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Apr 10, 2023 7:10:35 GMT -8
Judge, maybe you should read this rule to find out what I am talking about. Rule 5.06(c)(7) Comment (Rule 5.09(g) Comment): “If a pitched ball lodges in the umpire’s or catcher’s mask or paraphernalia, and remains out of play, on the third strike or fourth ball, then the batter is entitled to first base and all runners advance one base. If the count on the batter is less than three balls, runners advance one base.” That would explain why the 2nd base ump’s call was so late (for a balk well after the pitch was delivered and ball/strike call was made). Also why it’s in the score line as a “wild pitch”. Works for me (although I’m always impressed by Judge’s certitude). It's possible, but I rewatched that play several times and I could not see the ball getting stuck in any of the catcher's gear. Weird play, for sure.
|
|
|
Post by zeroposter on Apr 10, 2023 7:57:14 GMT -8
I would imagine that Parker will have the answer to the balk-interference tonight. I also see zip in regard to Ferrer or ball. Quite entertaining.
|
|
rafer
Sophomore
Posts: 1,640
|
Post by rafer on Apr 10, 2023 8:11:01 GMT -8
My favorite part about the weekend was how o didn't get any home runs and thus we didn't have to see their stupid football helmet brought out for the celebration. I heard that their football helmet is in the transfer portal. priceless!!!
|
|