|
Post by wbosh15 on Feb 22, 2022 8:40:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Feb 22, 2022 9:09:06 GMT -8
Charlie Cream is a #L$EYS%%. No respect for the PAC-12, and clearly no respect for OSU's SOS. Granted, we are not playing to the level in past years but we are playing well enough to knock off a few teams in the NCAA Tournament. If it were up to Charlie, more PAC-12 Teams would be playing in the NIT every season.
|
|
|
Post by beaverwbb fan on Feb 22, 2022 9:17:49 GMT -8
Colorado has played a pretty weak SOS.
I think OSU being 1-10 against Q1 opponents is a killer. The loss at ASU and the home loss to Arizona were difference makers. Playing at Utah and Colorado gives us two more opportunities for Q1 wins and I really think we need them both.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Feb 22, 2022 9:17:58 GMT -8
Charlie Cream is a #L$EYS%%. No respect for the PAC-12, and clearly no respect for OSU's SOS. Granted, we are not playing to the level in past years but we are playing well enough to knock off a few teams in the NCAA Tournament. If it were up to Charlie, more PAC-12 Teams would be playing in the NIT every season. Half of the conference projected in is a negative bias?
|
|
|
Post by sparty on Feb 22, 2022 9:19:01 GMT -8
Charlie Cream is a #L$EYS%%. No respect for the PAC-12, and clearly no respect for OSU's SOS. Granted, we are not playing to the level in past years but we are playing well enough to knock off a few teams in the NCAA Tournament. If it were up to Charlie, more PAC-12 Teams would be playing in the NIT every season. The easy solution to this is to not ride the bubble the last half of the season. They don’t factor in past years performance. Why have a selection committee ifCharlie does it? Your frustration should be directed at basketball operations inside of Gill.
|
|
|
Post by wbosh15 on Feb 22, 2022 9:20:00 GMT -8
Charlie Cream is a #L$EYS%%. No respect for the PAC-12, and clearly no respect for OSU's SOS. Granted, we are not playing to the level in past years but we are playing well enough to knock off a few teams in the NCAA Tournament. If it were up to Charlie, more PAC-12 Teams would be playing in the NIT every season. Also remember, this isn't who he thinks SHOULD be in the tournament, his job to to project what he thinks the committee will do based on the current numbers and past precident.
|
|
|
Post by lotrader on Feb 22, 2022 9:20:20 GMT -8
Colorado has played a pretty weak SOS. I think OSU being 1-10 against Q1 opponents is a killer. The loss at ASU and the home loss to Arizona were difference makers. Playing at Utah and Colorado gives us two more opportunities for Q1 wins and I really think we need them both. Agreed. We need to take care of business. It is our only guaranteed way into the tournament.
|
|
|
Post by sparty on Feb 22, 2022 9:26:23 GMT -8
Colorado has played a pretty weak SOS. I think OSU being 1-10 against Q1 opponents is a killer. The loss at ASU and the home loss to Arizona were difference makers. Playing at Utah and Colorado gives us two more opportunities for Q1 wins and I really think we need them both. Agreed. We need to take care of business. It is our only guaranteed way into the tournament. What is Colorado and Utahs net ranking? Does the net show their weak sos?
|
|
|
Post by wbosh15 on Feb 22, 2022 9:47:19 GMT -8
Agreed. We need to take care of business. It is our only guaranteed way into the tournament. What is Colorado and Utahs net ranking? Does the net show their weak sos? This was the NET rankings after Sunday's games. Pac-12 WBB NET ratings thru Sunday: Stanford 3, Oregon 12, Arizona 13, Utah 25, Colorado 31, Arizona State 41, Oregon State 50, UCLA 58, Washington State 62, USC 78, California 91, Washington 107
|
|
|
Post by beavdowg on Feb 22, 2022 11:22:46 GMT -8
Boy, I never, ever thought we'd have this discussion about a Rueck team. Weird to me that we're even in this position.
|
|
bvrbooster
Junior
2%
Posts: 2,558
Member is Online
|
Post by bvrbooster on Feb 22, 2022 11:31:06 GMT -8
Colorado has played a pretty weak SOS. I think OSU being 1-10 against Q1 opponents is a killer. The loss at ASU and the home loss to Arizona were difference makers. Playing at Utah and Colorado gives us two more opportunities for Q1 wins and I really think we need them both. I don't know how Q1 opponent is defined, but isn't Colorado one? We beat them, and we beat Oregon.
|
|
|
Post by wbosh15 on Feb 22, 2022 11:42:20 GMT -8
Colorado has played a pretty weak SOS. I think OSU being 1-10 against Q1 opponents is a killer. The loss at ASU and the home loss to Arizona were difference makers. Playing at Utah and Colorado gives us two more opportunities for Q1 wins and I really think we need them both. I don't know how Q1 opponent is defined, but isn't Colorado one? We beat them, and we beat Oregon. The quad 1 includes home games against teams in the top 30 of NET, neutral-site games against the top 50 and road games against the top 75.
|
|
|
Post by hoopheritic on Feb 22, 2022 13:05:28 GMT -8
I like where we sit on terms of ELO rating (4th in Pac 12) which is where we would likely be based on record had we not had postponed games. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by rgeorge on Feb 22, 2022 13:18:43 GMT -8
Charlie Cream is a #L$EYS%%. No respect for the PAC-12, and clearly no respect for OSU's SOS. Granted, we are not playing to the level in past years but we are playing well enough to knock off a few teams in the NCAA Tournament. If it were up to Charlie, more PAC-12 Teams would be playing in the NIT every season. Also remember, this isn't who he thinks SHOULD be in the tournament, his job to to project what he thinks the committee will do based on the current numbers and past precident. Without reading the "charlie" link... I take it he's out of his mind because 1/2 the Pac12 being in doesn't include OSU? Funny how that works. Could have sworn I've read lots of positives about Charlie on this very board?!
|
|
|
Post by treasurevalleybeav on Feb 22, 2022 13:40:48 GMT -8
We’re fortunate to only be the last one out after the pooch screwing loss at Wazzu and blowing it at the end of the game at ASU. Win both and we’d have been fine
|
|