|
Post by fridaynightlights on Nov 11, 2020 5:02:32 GMT -8
ESPN came out with their Pac-12 preview. Here are their preseason picks.
1. Oregon 2. ASU 3. UCLA 4. Stanford 5. UA 6. USC 7. Utah 8. Colorado 9. UW 10. Cal 11. OSU 12. WSU
|
|
|
Post by sagebrush on Nov 11, 2020 5:14:13 GMT -8
Overrated, but who cares any more.
|
|
|
Post by alwaysorange on Nov 11, 2020 5:58:54 GMT -8
If we end up 9th or higher coach deserves an extension. Lol
|
|
rafer
Sophomore
Posts: 1,559
|
Post by rafer on Nov 11, 2020 10:10:56 GMT -8
ESPN came out with their Pac-12 preview. Here are their preseason picks. 1. Oregon 2. ASU 3. UCLA 4. Stanford 5. UA 6. USC 7. Utah 8. Colorado 9. UW 10. Cal 11. OSU 12. WSU Looks like we can tell WAZZU that we think we might beat you in BB!! Whoohooo Payback for FB!! :-)
|
|
|
Post by messi on Nov 11, 2020 12:49:24 GMT -8
What do they know?
Sadly, I think I have more fingers on one hand than this team will get in wins this season.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 11, 2020 18:26:52 GMT -8
What do they know? Sadly, I think I have more fingers on one hand than this team will get in wins this season. Hopefully you have a successful carnival career as “The Man with 15 Fingers!”
|
|
|
Post by ee1990 on Nov 12, 2020 12:52:35 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 12, 2020 19:38:24 GMT -8
Boy, that Wayne Tinkle has sure turned things around...
|
|
|
Post by ee1990 on Nov 12, 2020 20:48:59 GMT -8
Boy, that Wayne Tinkle has sure turned things around...
|
|
|
Post by sagebrush on Nov 13, 2020 16:57:51 GMT -8
Is there a hot seat?
|
|
|
Post by cavalierbeaver on Nov 14, 2020 12:29:13 GMT -8
Good thing we don’t have all those coaches sons because that was the problem? Right? I would love to have Stevie Thompson and Tres Tinkle, I’m sure we would be picked in the top half of the conference with them.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Nov 14, 2020 13:18:46 GMT -8
Not enough resources to plug it in.
|
|
|
Post by ee1990 on Nov 14, 2020 16:30:32 GMT -8
Good thing we don’t have all those coaches sons because that was the problem? Right? I would love to have Stevie Thompson and Tres Tinkle, I’m sure we would be picked in the top half of the conference with them. Wat? The argument was always that the only reason, or a major reason, that Tinkle had any success relative to previous coaches is because of that angle, not the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by Henry Skrimshander on Nov 14, 2020 16:48:22 GMT -8
Good thing we don’t have all those coaches sons because that was the problem? Right? I would love to have Stevie Thompson and Tres Tinkle, I’m sure we would be picked in the top half of the conference with them. Wat? The argument was always that the only reason, or a major reason, that Tinkle had any success relative to previous coaches is because of that angle, not the opposite. No, it was the coaches kids are ball hogs, play too much, keep better players on the bench and that we'd be better off when they moved on.
|
|
|
Post by ee1990 on Nov 14, 2020 22:00:13 GMT -8
Wat? The argument was always that the only reason, or a major reason, that Tinkle had any success relative to previous coaches is because of that angle, not the opposite. No, it was the coaches kids are ball hogs, play too much, keep better players on the bench and that we'd be better off when they moved on. Well that's idiotic.
|
|