|
|
Post by TheGlove on Mar 17, 2020 12:18:40 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by beaversproud on Mar 17, 2020 12:42:14 GMT -8
Could be worse. Oregon was a top 10 team at times and the best they can do is 65%? It is sad to lose to Stanford though, I hear they never turn out for their team. And look at USC, great team (standings wise) and they're at 40% |
|
|
|
Post by TheGlove on Mar 17, 2020 13:00:20 GMT -8
Could be worse. Oregon was a top 10 team at times and the best they can do is 65%? It is sad to lose to Stanford though, I hear they never turn out for their team. And look at USC, great team (standings wise) and they're at 40% Could be better, much better. I'd take 65% attendance and P12 championship any day. |
|
|
|
Post by messi on Mar 17, 2020 13:13:12 GMT -8
We can always reduce capacity. That would bump up our % easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Mar 17, 2020 13:16:16 GMT -8
Could be worse. Oregon was a top 10 team at times and the best they can do is 65%? It is sad to lose to Stanford though, I hear they never turn out for their team. And look at USC, great team (standings wise) and they're at 40% Stanford has a smaller arena. 4,742 is not a good number. But it beats Robinson's 3,946. Or Jay John's 4,579. |
|
|
|
Post by drunkandstoopidbeav on Mar 17, 2020 13:24:31 GMT -8
We can always reduce capacity. That would bump up our % easily. Strategically placed black and orange tarp would work. A couple thousand bucks, maybe just hundreds, and we could win this stat next year. |
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Mar 17, 2020 13:56:29 GMT -8
Always love it when the guy with "stats are for losers" as his signature posts a stat.
This one in particular is great. He's now proven that good teams in bigger markets typically draw well. Ease of access to stadium probably also plays a factor.
|
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Mar 17, 2020 17:12:46 GMT -8
Always love it when the guy with "stats are for losers" as his signature posts a stat. This one in particular is great. He's now proven that good teams in bigger markets typically draw well. Ease of access to stadium probably also plays a factor. Wait what?? How is that proven above? Curious... "good teams" above OSU in the standings, in a MUCH larger market did not draw better? You think "ease of access" applies to places like LA? And, teams below OSU, not good (especially UW) drew very well. Bigger market but certainly not good teams. Hmmmm What it showed it the average number of peeps/game and the % of capacity... pretty simple. The rest of the post was sarcasm (knowing the poster and the .500 for .500) and as relevant as comparing past coaching failures to justify current mediocrity. |
|
