|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 17, 2020 10:43:32 GMT -8
Hard to throw a perfect game every time out? What happened last night is who we are. And, his post contained a false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half?
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jan 17, 2020 10:45:18 GMT -8
Hard to throw a perfect game every time out? What happened last night is who we are. As false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half? What? You called his comment false and then your post agreed with him. Might want to double check that. He's stating we suck.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 17, 2020 10:49:35 GMT -8
As false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half? What? You called his comment false and then your post agreed with him. Might want to double check that. He's stating we suck. Clarified, but even in the original form it is pretty clear... the quoted post, before mine, is being discussed. And... false assertion in a post and calling a post false is not the same. But, kudos for having the need to reply so promptly.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jan 17, 2020 10:53:02 GMT -8
What? You called his comment false and then your post agreed with him. Might want to double check that. He's stating we suck. Clarified, but even in the original form it is pretty clear... the quoted post, before mine, is being discussed. And... false assertion in a post and calling a post false is not the same. But, kudos for having the need to reply so promptly. And Kudos to you for keeping up your perfect record of never admitting you're wrong.
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jan 17, 2020 10:59:22 GMT -8
Sorry I'm done with Tinkle. He has to go. We've only lost to one team outside the top 70 in the NET rankings, and that was on the road. I'm not sure you guys remember our last few coaching searches, where many of the top names mentioned for the job said no thanks or weren't interested. IF we made a change (and I'm not saying we should), the guy I'd be interested in is Damon Stoudamire. In his 4th year at Pacific, he has the Tigers 15-5, including a win over St. Mary's....a team that beat ASU, Cal, and Wisconsin already this season. Damon knows the Northwest, has NBA cred with recruits, and could probably find and develop us a point guard. Plus, his family has pretty good basketball genes. Could probably find a relative or two to add to the roster.
|
|
|
Post by osubeaver2018 on Jan 17, 2020 11:18:01 GMT -8
Hard to throw a perfect game every time out? What happened last night is who we are. And, his post contained a false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half? Pretty sure KK came out to start the 2nd half and got pulled immediately after letting Stewart get position on him for an easy lay-in down low on the first possession. He didn't sit long though, still had 30 minutes for the game and was the only one seemingly able to score outside of Tres at the line.
|
|
|
Post by Judge Smails on Jan 17, 2020 11:20:15 GMT -8
Sorry I'm done with Tinkle. He has to go. We've only lost to one team outside the top 70 in the NET rankings, and that was on the road. I'm not sure you guys remember our last few coaching searches, where many of the top names mentioned for the job said no thanks or weren't interested. IF we made a change (and I'm not saying we should), the guy I'd be interested in is Damon Stoudamire. In his 4th year at Pacific, he has the Tigers 15-5, including a win over St. Mary's....a team that beat ASU, Cal, and Wisconsin already this season. Damon knows the Northwest, has NBA cred with recruits, and could probably find and develop us a point guard. Plus, his family has pretty good basketball genes. Could probably find a relative or two to add to the roster. Ritchie McKay is currently 18-1 at Liberty. This could be his dream job.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 17, 2020 12:52:55 GMT -8
Sorry I'm done with Tinkle. He has to go. We've only lost to one team outside the top 70 in the NET rankings, and that was on the road.I'm not sure you guys remember our last few coaching searches, where many of the top names mentioned for the job said no thanks or weren't interested. IF we made a change (and I'm not saying we should), the guy I'd be interested in is Damon Stoudamire. In his 4th year at Pacific, he has the Tigers 15-5, including a win over St. Mary's....a team that beat ASU, Cal, and Wisconsin already this season. Damon knows the Northwest, has NBA cred with recruits, and could probably find and develop us a point guard. Plus, his family has pretty good basketball genes. Could probably find a relative or two to add to the roster. Except that is a fluid statement... Net rankings for our opponents will change. I do not see our quad 1 & 2 record (3-5) currently being able to overcome a 5-8 league finish and the NC schedule that will have an SOS in the 320-340 range. @ WSU is imperative... and vs UCLA (RPI 180) and SC (RPI 23) are huge to get back on track before heading to the Bay area. OSU needs to create a NET "cushion" to make up for a terrible NC and tough tailend to their schedule. If they do not win at least 3 of the next 5, OSU would need to get to the Pac12 title game to make the dance barring a huge 6-2 type finish vs 6 of last 8 teams currently in the top 60 NET... 5 in top 30.
|
|
|
Post by spudbeaver on Jan 17, 2020 13:13:32 GMT -8
We've only lost to one team outside the top 70 in the NET rankings, and that was on the road. I'm not sure you guys remember our last few coaching searches, where many of the top names mentioned for the job said no thanks or weren't interested. IF we made a change (and I'm not saying we should), the guy I'd be interested in is Damon Stoudamire. In his 4th year at Pacific, he has the Tigers 15-5, including a win over St. Mary's....a team that beat ASU, Cal, and Wisconsin already this season. Damon knows the Northwest, has NBA cred with recruits, and could probably find and develop us a point guard. Plus, his family has pretty good basketball genes. Could probably find a relative or two to add to the roster. Ritchie McKay is currently 18-1 at Liberty. This could be his dream job. Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jan 17, 2020 13:15:27 GMT -8
Hard to throw a perfect game every time out? What happened last night is who we are. And, his post contained a false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half? First off, if we're going to differentiate between a false post and a statement in the post being false, I'm going to have to object to you saying that I said it had anything to do with the OUTCOME of the game. I said it affected the game...as in, we missed opportunities to chip away at the lead. We missed opportunities to maybe set up a trap or press that could've resulted in turnovers. Psychologically, being down 13 is way more deflating than being down 8. No, missing free throws didn't lose us that game, and if we're 22-22, we probably still don't win. But did it affect the way we played? I argue yes. I'll now wait for you to find a typo or grammatical error and tell me why I'm an idiot for thinking this. Hope your weekend goes well buddy.
|
|
|
Post by nabeav on Jan 17, 2020 13:23:33 GMT -8
We've only lost to one team outside the top 70 in the NET rankings, and that was on the road.I'm not sure you guys remember our last few coaching searches, where many of the top names mentioned for the job said no thanks or weren't interested. IF we made a change (and I'm not saying we should), the guy I'd be interested in is Damon Stoudamire. In his 4th year at Pacific, he has the Tigers 15-5, including a win over St. Mary's....a team that beat ASU, Cal, and Wisconsin already this season. Damon knows the Northwest, has NBA cred with recruits, and could probably find and develop us a point guard. Plus, his family has pretty good basketball genes. Could probably find a relative or two to add to the roster. Except that is a fluid statement... Net rankings for our opponents will change. I do not see our quad 1 & 2 record (3-5) currently being able to overcome a 5-8 league finish and the NC schedule that will have an SOS in the 320-340 range. @ WSU is imperative... and vs UCLA (RPI 180) and SC (RPI 23) are huge to get back on track before heading to the Bay area. OSU needs to create a NET "cushion" to make up for a terrible NC and tough tailend to their schedule. If they do not win at least 3 of the next 5, OSU would need to get to the Pac12 title game to make the dance barring a huge 6-2 type finish vs 6 of last 8 teams currently in the top 60 NET... 5 in top 30. God dude, you just don't quit. Of course it's a fluid statement. My point is that the teams we've lost to have had relatively good seasons to this point. (And by relative, I mean to all 300+ teams. Not to us, not to their own expectations, not to whatever you want to say I really mean by this statement. All of our losses have come to teams currently in the top 25% of the NET rankings. That's what I'm saying.) But hey, continue to tell me why I'm an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 17, 2020 13:53:02 GMT -8
Except that is a fluid statement... Net rankings for our opponents will change. I do not see our quad 1 & 2 record (3-5) currently being able to overcome a 5-8 league finish and the NC schedule that will have an SOS in the 320-340 range. @ WSU is imperative... and vs UCLA (RPI 180) and SC (RPI 23) are huge to get back on track before heading to the Bay area. OSU needs to create a NET "cushion" to make up for a terrible NC and tough tailend to their schedule. If they do not win at least 3 of the next 5, OSU would need to get to the Pac12 title game to make the dance barring a huge 6-2 type finish vs 6 of last 8 teams currently in the top 60 NET... 5 in top 30. God dude, you just don't quit. Of course it's a fluid statement. My point is that the teams we've lost to have had relatively good seasons to this point. (And by relative, I mean to all 300+ teams. Not to us, not to their own expectations, not to whatever you want to say I really mean by this statement. All of our losses have come to teams currently in the top 25% of the NET rankings. That's what I'm saying.) But hey, continue to tell me why I'm an idiot. LOL... having a bad day? No one called you wrong, and certainly not an idiot. But, since were going t=down the rabbit hole with your obvious oversensitivity of someone else sharing an opinion about what you post, ok! Implying free throws were any part of the contest after being routed is a bit ridiculous. Especially, since the 8 point outcome could be argued as as much of UW letting up. Hence, making FTs would mean a what 10-11 point loss vs a 17-20? So, since you are so touchy I might as well just call you out on the last two posts being idiotically over sensitive. Trying to justify WT's teams being consistently inconsistent by pointing out the NET record is again inconsequential to how the team plays regardless of a NET ranking. So, the converse to your NET issue is that the teams we've beaten are having bad seasons. Last time I looked the 10 NC wins had opponents at about a 29% winning clip. And, yep also has zero to do with the Arizona to UW performance levels. I'll have a great weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Ruh Roh Beav on Jan 17, 2020 13:55:32 GMT -8
Except that is a fluid statement... Net rankings for our opponents will change. I do not see our quad 1 & 2 record (3-5) currently being able to overcome a 5-8 league finish and the NC schedule that will have an SOS in the 320-340 range. @ WSU is imperative... and vs UCLA (RPI 180) and SC (RPI 23) are huge to get back on track before heading to the Bay area. OSU needs to create a NET "cushion" to make up for a terrible NC and tough tailend to their schedule. If they do not win at least 3 of the next 5, OSU would need to get to the Pac12 title game to make the dance barring a huge 6-2 type finish vs 6 of last 8 teams currently in the top 60 NET... 5 in top 30. God dude, you just don't quit. Of course it's a fluid statement. My point is that the teams we've lost to have had relatively good seasons to this point. (And by relative, I mean to all 300+ teams. Not to us, not to their own expectations, not to whatever you want to say I really mean by this statement. All of our losses have come to teams currently in the top 25% of the NET rankings. That's what I'm saying.) But hey, continue to tell me why I'm an idiot. Hey NA......u can never win your statements vs base1111......my suggestion is to basically ignore his posts and just respond to others on this forum
|
|
|
Post by baseba1111 on Jan 17, 2020 14:05:47 GMT -8
God dude, you just don't quit. Of course it's a fluid statement. My point is that the teams we've lost to have had relatively good seasons to this point. (And by relative, I mean to all 300+ teams. Not to us, not to their own expectations, not to whatever you want to say I really mean by this statement. All of our losses have come to teams currently in the top 25% of the NET rankings. That's what I'm saying.) But hey, continue to tell me why I'm an idiot. Hey NA......u can never win your statements vs base1111......my suggestion is to basically ignore his posts and just respond to others on this forum Or post dumb arse stuff and get deleted like some! 😉
|
|
|
Post by wilkyisdashiznit on Jan 17, 2020 14:09:24 GMT -8
And, his post contained a false assertion. The final was 8 points as UW took the foot off. It was double digits most of the 2nd half... maybe 90%!? It was never a game. The missed free throws had zero to do with the outcome. Question... may have missed a explanation or anyone else bringing it up... why did KK sit to start the 2nd half? First off, if we're going to differentiate between a false post and a statement in the post being false, I'm going to have to object to you saying that I said it had anything to do with the OUTCOME of the game. I said it affected the game...as in, we missed opportunities to chip away at the lead. We missed opportunities to maybe set up a trap or press that could've resulted in turnovers. Psychologically, being down 13 is way more deflating than being down 8. No, missing free throws didn't lose us that game, and if we're 22-22, we probably still don't win. But did it affect the way we played? I argue yes. I'll now wait for you to find a typo or grammatical error and tell me why I'm an idiot for thinking this. Hope your weekend goes well buddy. Seattle is a tough place to play. Oregon State has not won in Seattle since 2003. Some comparative metrics: The Beavers finished with their third least-efficient offensive performance on the year (ahead of only Texas A&M and Utah) and paired its second least-efficient defensive performance (ahead of only Utah). The offensive numbers match Oregon State's effective field goal percentage (pts/shot). Oregon State came down with 56.4% of all rebounds. That is the second-most in conference play since the game before, Arizona. The pair represent the two best conference rebounding performances since the second Arizona State game last year. The Beavers posted their worst block percentage (percentage of shots blocked) since playing Washington State last year. The Beavers' offensive rebound percentage was their highest since playing Cal State Northridge in the season opener. The game was the best offensive rebounding game in conference since Oregon State played in Seattle last year, as the Huskies apparently do not block out. The Beavers' defensive rebound percentage was their highest since Arkansas-Pine Bluff. Oregon State had its highest percentage of defensive rebounds since beating California last year. The Beavers allowed the highest defensive effective field goal percentage on the year. No team has shot as efficiently, since Oregon State last played in Seattle.
|
|